Mechanical Behavior of Florence Clay at the High-speed Train Station

  • Angelina Parlato
  • Anna d’Onofrio
  • Augusto Penna
  • Filippo de Magistris
Conference paper
Part of the Solid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 146)


To develop the design of the Florence high-speed train station, Arup’s office in Milan committed to the geotechnical laboratory of the University of Naples the execution of an extensive experimental program.

Special triaxial and RCTS (resonant column-torsional shear) tests were performed using deep undisturbed samples of Florence clay. To reduce initial damage to specimens, the coil wire suspension method, proposed by the Imperial College, was adopted. Moreover, two tests were performed on specimens set up with the more traditional wet setting and dry setting method. The best results were obtained through the dry setting method.

Using both RCTS and TXJ it was possible to analyze the small and medium strain behavior of specimens, while the strength was studied under triaxial condition only. Some triaxial extension tests were also performed. Data obtained from THOR and TXJ at small and at medium strain were compared in terms of undrained shear modulus. A fairly good agreement has been found between the experimental results.


Void Ratio Triaxial Test Compression Index Oedometer Test Atterberg Limit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ampadu SK, Tatsuoka F.(1993): “Effect of Setting Method on the Behavior of Clays in Triaxial Compression from Saturation to Undrained Shear,” Soils and Foundations 33, No. 2, 14–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aversa S. e F. Vinale (1995): “Improvements to a stress-path triaxial cell” ASTM Geot. Test. Journ. Vol. 18 No1, 116–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burland, J.B. and Maswoswe J. (1982): Discussion to Tedd and Charles, In situ measurement of horizontal stress in overconsolidated clay using push-in spade-shaped pressure cells, Geotechnique Vol. 32no 3 pp. 285–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavallaro A., Fioravante V., Lanzo, G. Lo Presti D.C.F., Rampello S., d’Onofrio A., Santucci de Magistris F., Silvestri, F. (2002): “Report on the current situation of laboratori stress-strain testing of geomaterials in Italy and its use in practice” Advanced Laboratory stress-strain testing of geomaterials, outcome of TC29 of ISSMGE from 1994 to 2001, Balkema, 15–45.Google Scholar
  5. D’Onofrio A., Silvestri F., Vinale F.(2000): “A new torsional shear device” ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal 22, No. 2, 107–117.Google Scholar
  6. Goto, S., Tatsuoka, F., Shibuya, S., Kim, Y.S. and Sato T. (1991): A simple gauge for local small strain measurement in the laboratory, Soils and Foundations, 31(1), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Parlato, A. e Santucci de Magistris, F. (2003): “Confronto tra una cella triassiale a stress path controllato ed una cella “TXJ””, IARG 2003.Google Scholar
  8. Burland, J. B. (1990): “On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clays”. Géotechnique 40, No. 3, 329–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hight, D. W. & Georgiannou, V. N. (1995): “Effects of sampling on the undrained behavior of clayey sands” Géotechnique 45, No. 2, 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Santucci de Magistris, F., Koseki, J., Amaya, M., Hamaya, S., Sato, T. and Tatsuoka F. (1999): A triaxial testing system to evaluate stress-strain behavior of soils for wide range of strain and strain rate, Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, 22(1), 44–60.Google Scholar
  11. Skempton, A. W. e V. A. Sowa, V. A (1963): “The behavior of saturated clays during sampling and testing”. Géotechnique 13, No 4, 269–290.Google Scholar
  12. Tatsuoka, F. (1988): “Some Recent Developments in Triaxial Testing System for Cohesionless Soils,” Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, STP 977, R.T. Donaghe, R.C. Chaney and M.L., Silver Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 7–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tatsuoka, F., Sato, T., Park, C.-S., Kim, Y.-S., Mukabi, J.N., and Kohata, Y., (1994): “Measurements of Elastic Properties of Geomaterials in Laboratory Compression Tests,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tatsuoka, F., Ishihara, M., Di Benedetto, H. and Kuwano, R. (2002): Time-dependent shear deformation characteristics of geomaterials and their simulation, Soils and Foundations, 42-2, pp. 103–129.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angelina Parlato
    • 1
  • Anna d’Onofrio
    • 1
  • Augusto Penna
    • 1
  • Filippo de Magistris
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Geotechnical EngineeringUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly
  2. 2.S.A.V.A. DepartmentUniversity of MoliseCampobassoItaly

Personalised recommendations