Distance Learners Juggling Home, Work and Study

Is Gender an Issue?
  • Arwen Raddon
Part of the Lifelong Learning Book Series book series (LLLB, volume 9)


Distance Education Distance Learning Domestic Work Domestic Chore Domestic Responsibility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atan, Hanafi, Rahman, Zuraidah A., Majid, Omar, Ghani, Noraida A. and Idrus, Rozhan M. (2005) ‘The support system in distance education: factors affecting achievements among women learners’, in Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 6 (4), Article 11Google Scholar
  2. Baxter Magolda, Marcia B. (1992) Knowing and Reasoning in College, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Beaty, Elizabeth, Dall-Alba, Gloria and Marton, Ference (1997) ’The personal experience of learning in higher education: changing views and enduring perspectives’, in Sutherland, Peter (ed.) Adult Learning: a reader, London: Kogan PageGoogle Scholar
  4. Belenky, Mary Field, Clinchy, Blythe McVicker, Goldberger, Nancy Rule and Tarule, Jill Mattuck (1986) Women’s Ways of Knowing, New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  5. Berge, Zane L. (2000) ‘A tangled web indeed: the difficulty of developing a research agenda for distance education’, DEOSNEWS 11 (10), (accessed December 2002)Google Scholar
  6. Biggs, John (1987) Student Approaches to Learning and Studying, Melbourne: ACERGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley, Harriet (1999) Gender and Power in the Workplace, London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  8. Brennan, John, Mills, Jonathan, Shah, Tarla and Woodley, Alan (2000) ‘Lifelong learning for employment and equity: the role of part-time degrees’, Higher Education Quarterly 54 (4), 411–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies, Karen (1990) Women, Time and Weaving of the Strands of Everyday Life, Aldershot: GowerGoogle Scholar
  10. Department for Education and Employment (2000) Women and Barriers to Training, London: The Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar
  11. Diaz, David P. and Cartnal, Ryan B. (1999) ‘Students’ learning styles in two classes: online distance learning and equivalent on-campus’, College Teaching 47 (4), 130–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards, Rosalind (1993) Mature Women Students: separating or connecting family and education, London: Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
  13. Entwistle, Noel (1981) Styles of Learning and Teaching: an integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers, Chichester: WileyGoogle Scholar
  14. Faith, Karlene (ed.) (1988) Towards New Horizons for Women in Distance Education, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Francis, Becky (1999) ‘Modernist reductionism or post-structuralist relativism: can we move on? An evaluation of the arguments in relation to feminist educational research’, Gender and Education 11 (4), 381–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilligan, Carol (1982) In A Different Voice, Massachusetts: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Grace, Margaret (1994) ‘Meanings and motivations: women’s experiences of studying at a distance’, Open Learning 9 (1), 13–21Google Scholar
  18. Honey, Peter and Mumford, Alan (1986) The Manual of Learning Styles, Berkshire: Peter Honey and Alan MumfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelly, Liz, Regan, Linda and Burton, Sheila (1992) ‘Defending the indefensible? quantitative methods and feminist research’, in Holland, Janet, Blair, Maud and Sheldon, Sue (eds), Debates and Issues in Feminist Research and Pedagogy, Avon: Multilingual Matters with the Open UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirkup, Gill (1996) ‘The importance of gender’, in Mills, Roger and Tait, Alan (eds), Supporting the Learner in Open and Distance Learning, London: Pitman PublishingGoogle Scholar
  21. Kolb, David A. (1984) Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development, New Jersey: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  22. Letherby, Gayle (2003) Feminist Research in Theory and Practice, Buckingham: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Marton, Ference and Saljo, Roger (1976) ‘On qualitative differences in learning, outcome and process II’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 115–27Google Scholar
  24. Maynard, Mary (1994) ‘methods, practice and epistemology: the debate about feminism and research’, in Maynard, Mary and Purvis, June (eds),Researching Women’s Lives from a Feminist Perspective, London: Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
  25. Merrill, Barbara (1999) Gender, Change and Identity: mature women students in universities, Aldershot: Ashgate PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Oakley, Ann (2000) Experiments in Knowing: gender and method in the social sciences, Oxford: Polity Press with Blackwell Publishers LtdGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Rourke, Jennifer (1999) ‘Canaries in the mine? Women’s experience and new learning technologies’, in Tait, Alan and Mills, Roger (eds), The Convergence of Distance and Conventional Education, patterns of flexibility for the individual learner, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Pahl, Jan (1983) ‘The allocation of money and structuring of inequality within marriage’, Sociological Review 13, 237–62Google Scholar
  29. Pascall, Gillian and Cox, Roger (1993) Women Returning to Higher Education, Buckingham: SRHE and Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  30. Perraton, Hilary (2000) Open and Distance Learning in the Developing World, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Pilcher, Jane (1999) Women in Contemporary Britain: an introduction, London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Quinn, Jocey (2003) Powerful Subjects: are women really taking over the university?, Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham BooksGoogle Scholar
  33. Richardson, John T.E. (2000) Researching Student Learning: approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education, Buckingham: SRHE and Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Ross, Karen (2000) Women at the Top 2000: cracking the public sector glass ceiling, London: The Hansard SocietyGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott, Sue (1985) ‘Feminist research and qualitative methodology: a discussion of some of the issues’, in Burgess, B. (ed.), Issues in Educational Research: Qualitative Methods, London: Falmer PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Severiens, Sabine E. and Ten Dam, Gert (1994) ‘Gender differences in learning styles: a narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis’, Higher Education 27, 487–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Severiens, Sabine E., Ten Dam, Gert and Nijenhuis, Edith (1998) ‘Ways of knowing and patterns of reasoning: women and men in adult secondary education’, Gender and Education 10 (3), 327–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sherry, Lorraine (1996) ‘Issues in distance learning’, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1 (4), 337–65Google Scholar
  39. Sullivan, Cath and Lewis, Sue (2001) ‘Home-based telework, gender, and the synchronization of work and family: perspectives of teleworkers and their co-residents’, Gender, Work and Organization 8 (2), 123–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taplin, Margaret and Jegede, Olugbemiro (2001) ‘Gender differences in factors influencing achievement of distance education students’, Open Learning 16 (2), 133–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. von Prümmer, Christine (1994) ‘Women-friendly perspectives in distance education’, Open Learning 9 (1), 2–12Google Scholar
  42. von Prümmer, Christine (2000) Women and Distance Education: Challenges and Opportunities, London: Routledge FalmerGoogle Scholar
  43. Wisker, Gina (1996) Empowering Women in Higher Education, London: Kogan PageGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arwen Raddon
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeicesterLeicester

Personalised recommendations