Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trade Liberalization in Cotton and Sugar

Impacts on developing countries

  • Conference paper
Agricultural Trade Liberalization and the Least Developed Countries

Part of the book series: Wageningen UR Frontis Series ((WURF,volume 19))

  • 3 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baffes, J., 2003. Cotton and Developing Countries: a case study in policy incoherence. World Bank, Washington. Trade Note no.10. [http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRANETTRADE/Resources/ TradeNote10.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • Baffes, J., 2004. The cotton problem. World Bank, Washington. [http://www.fao.org/es/ESC/common/ ecg/47647_en_CottonProblem_Baffes.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • CIE, 2002. Targets for OECD sugar market liberalisation: report prepared for the Global Alliance for Sugar Trade Reform and Liberalisation. Center for International Economics, Canberra. [http://www.thecie.com.au/publications/CIE-OECD_sugar_market_liberalisation.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • Dymock, P., 2002. Working Party on Agricultural Policies and Markets: background information on selected policy issues in the sugar sector. OECD, Paris. AGR/CA/APM(2001)32/FINAL. [http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2001doc.nsf/8d00615172fd2a63c125685d005300b5/b58856619f383e 33c1256bd1004ceff4/$FILE/JT00127791.PDF]

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbehri, A., Hertel, T., Ingco, M., et al., 2000. Partial liberalization of the world sugar market: a general equilibrium analysis of tariff-rate quota regimes: paper presented as a selected paper at the annual conference on global economics analysis, June 28-30, 2000, Melbourne, Australia. [http://www.monash.edu.au/policy/conf/10Hertel-update.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, 2004. Cotton: impact of support policies on developing countries: a guide to contemporary analysis. FAO, Rome. FAO Trade Policy Technical Notes no. 1. [ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/y5533e/y5533e01.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillson, I., Poulton, C., Balcombe, K., et al., 2004. Understanding the impact of cotton subsidies on developing countries. Overseas Development Institute, London. [http://www.odi.org.uk/iedg/Projects/cotton_report.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • Goreux, L., 2004. Prejudice caused by industrialised countries subsidies to cotton sectors in Western and Central Africa. 2nd edn. [http://www.fao.org/es/esc/common/ecg/47647_en_Goreux_Prejudicef.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAC, 2002. Production and trade policies affecting the cotton industry. International Cotton Advisory Committee, Washington. [http://www.icac.org/meetings/cgtn_conf/documents/icac_ccgtn_report. pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis, G., 2004. The EU cotton policy regime and the implications of the proposed changes for producer welfare. FAO, Rome. FAO Commodity and Trade Policy Research Working Paper no. 9. [ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/j2732e/j2732e00.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D., 2004. Sugar policies: opportunity for change. World Bank, Washington. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 3222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poonyth, D., Sarris, A., Sharma, R., et al., 2004. The impact of domestic and trade policies on the world cotton market. FAO, Rome. FAO Commodity and Trade Policy Research Working Paper no. 8. [ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/007/j2731e/j2731e00.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, D., 2003. A quantitative simulation analysis of the impacts of U.S. cotton subsidies on cotton prices and quantities. [http://www.mre.gov.br/portugues/ministerio/sitios_secretaria/cgc/ analisequantitativa.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Mensbrugghe, D., Beghin, J. C. and Mitchell, D., 2003. Modeling tariff rate quotas in a global context: the case of sugar markets in OECD countries. Iowa State Universty, Ames. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Working Paper no. 03-WP 343. [http://www.card.iastate.edu/ publications/DBS/PDFFiles/03wp343.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K., 2002. Cultivating poverty: the impact of US cotton subsidies on Africa. Oxfam, Washington. Oxfam Briefing Paper no. 30. [http://www.oxfam.org.uk/what_we_do/issues/trade/downloads/ bp30_cotton.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K., 2004. Dumping on the world: how EU sugar policies hurt poor countries. Oxfam, Washington. Oxfam Briefing Paper no. 61. [http://www.oxfam.org.uk/what_we_do/issues/trade/ downloads/bp61_sugar_dumping.pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgenant, M.K., 1999. Effects of trade liberalization on the world sugar market. FAO, Rome. [http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/X2643E/X2643E00.HTM]

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. General manager, Institute for International Trade Negotiations (ICONE), São Paulo, Brazil

    AndréMeloni Nassar

Authors
  1. AndréMeloni Nassar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Niek Koning

  2. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

    Per Pinstrup-Andersen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nassar, A. (2007). Trade Liberalization in Cotton and Sugar. In: Koning, N., Pinstrup-Andersen, P. (eds) Agricultural Trade Liberalization and the Least Developed Countries. Wageningen UR Frontis Series, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6080-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6080-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-6079-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-6080-9

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation