Will Market Competition Assure Academic Quality? An Analysis of the UK and US Experience

  • David D. Dill
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 20)

A major change that has accompanied the worldwide ‘massification’ of higher education is the new-found openness of policy makers to the use of competitive markets to steer the university sector. In many countries efforts to improve the quality of publicly provided higher education, both in teaching and in research, are leading to experiments with market-based policy instruments (Teixeira et al. 2004). The perceived quality of universities in the competitive US system – which Trow (2000) has termed the ‘American advantage’ – has inspired much of this interest in market forces. While a number of these market experiments may also be motivated by a desire to restrict public expenditures in rapidly expanding systems of higher education, many policy makers and academics believe that there is a relationship between the degree of market competition and academic quality (Dill 2005).

Keywords

Europe Transportation Amid Income Marketing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Astin, A.W. Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorities and Practices in Higher Education. San Francisco, London: Jossey-Bass, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. Barr, N. The Economics of the Welfare State, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G.S. Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-David, J. American Higher Education: Directions Old and New. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.Google Scholar
  5. Berdahl, R.O. and I.J. Spitzberg Jr. “Quality and Access as Interrelated Policy Issues.” In Berdahl, R.O., G.C. Moodie, and I.J. Spitzberg Jr. (eds). Quality and Access in Higher Education: Comparing Britain and the United States. Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press, 1991, 164-171.Google Scholar
  6. Bird, R. “Reflections on the British Government and Higher Education in the 1980s.” Higher Education Quarterly 48 (1994): 75-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brennan, J. and T. Shah. Managing Quality in Higher Education: An International Perspective on Institutional Assessment and Change. Buckingham, UK: OECD, SRHE and Open University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. Brewer, D., S.M. Gates, and C.A. Goldman. In Pursuit of Prestige: Strategy and Competition in US Higher Education. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, R. Quality Assurance in Higher Education: The UK Experience Since 1992. London: Routledge Farmer, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. Canton, E. and H. Vossensteyn. “Deregulation of Higher Education: Tuition Fee Differentiation and Selectivity in the US.” In CPB and CHEPS. Higher Education Reform, Getting the Incentives Right. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Sdu Uitgevers, 2001, 67-84.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, B.R. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-national Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, B.R. “The Modern Integration of Research Activities with Teaching and Learning.” Journal of Higher Education 68 (1997): 241-255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke, M. “Some Guidelines for Academic Quality Rankings.” Higher Education in Europe 27 (2002): 443-459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coate, K., R. Barnett, and G. Williams. “Relationships Between Teaching and Research in Higher Education in England.” Higher Education Quarterly 55 (2001): 158-174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coates, G. and N. Adnett. “Encouraging Cream-skimming and Dreg-siphoning? Increasing Competition Between English HEIs.” British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (2003): 202-218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Connor, H., R. Burton, R. Pearson, E. Pollard, and J. Regan. Making the Right Choice: How Students Choose Universities and Colleges. London: Universities UK, 1999.Google Scholar
  17. Dale, S.T. and A.B. Kreuger. “Estimating the Payoff to Attending a More Selective College: An Application of Selection on Observables and Unobservables.” Working Paper 409, Industrial Relations Center, Princeton University, 1998.Google Scholar
  18. DfES (Department for Education and Skills). The Future of Higher Education (White Paper). London: HMSO, Cm 5735, 2003.Google Scholar
  19. Dill, D.D. “Academic Accountability and University Adaptation: The Architecture of an Academic Learning Organization.” Higher Education 38 (1999): 127-154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dill, D.D. “Allowing the Market to Rule: The Case of the United States.” Higher Education Quarterly, 57 (2003): 136-157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dill, D.D. “Are Public Research Universities Effective Communities of Learning? The Collective Action Dilemma of Assuring Academic Standards.” Paper presented at the Symposium: Future of the American Public Research University, Penn State University, 25 February 2005.Google Scholar
  22. Dill, D.D. and M. Soo. “Transparency and Quality in Higher Education Markets.” In Teixeira, P., B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, and A. Amaral (eds). Markets in Higher Education Rhetoric or Reality. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 2004, 61-86.Google Scholar
  23. Dill, D.D. and M. Soo. “Academic Quality, League Tables, and Public Policy: A Cross-national Analysis of University Ranking Systems.” Higher Education 49 (2005): 495-533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dolton, P.J., D. Greenaway, and A. Vignoles. “‘Whither Higher Education?’ An Economic Perspective for the Dearing Committee of Inquiry.” Economic Journal 107 (1997): 710-726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Drennan, L.T. and M. Beck. “Teaching Quality Performance Indicators: Key Influences on the UK Universities’ Scores.” Quality Assurance in Education 9 (2001): 92-102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ehrenberg, R.G. Tuition Rising: Why College Costs so Much. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  27. Ehrenberg, R.G. “Reaching for the Brass Ring: The US News & World Report Rankings and Competition.” Review of Higher Education 26 (2003): 145-162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Feller, I. “Social Contracts and the Impact of Matching Fund Requirements on American Research Universities.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 22 (2000): 91-98.Google Scholar
  29. Fox, M.F. “Research, Teaching, and Publication Productivity: Mutuality versus Competition in Academia.” Sociology of Education 65 (1992): 293-305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Garvin, D.A. The Economics of University Behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  31. Gormley, W.T. and D.L. Weimer. Organizational Report Cards. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  32. Graham, A. and N. Thompson. “Broken Ranks: US News’ College Rankings Measure Everything but what Matters, and Most Universities Don’t Seem to Mind.” Washington Monthly 33 (2001): 9-14.Google Scholar
  33. Granovetter, M. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (1985): 481-510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Green, D. What is Quality in Higher Education? Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  35. Hare, P. “The UK’s Research Assessment Exercise: Its Impact on Institutions, Departments, Individuals.” Higher Education Management and Policy 15 (2003): 45-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harley, S. “The Impact of Research Selectivity on Academic Work and Identity in UK Universities.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (2002): 187-205.Google Scholar
  37. Haveman, R.H., A. Bershadker, and J.A. Schwabish. Human Capital in the United States from 1975 to 2000: Patterns of Growth and Utilization. Kalamazoo, Michigan: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, 2003.Google Scholar
  38. Henkel, M. Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley, 2000.Google Scholar
  39. HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England). “Interactions Between Research, Teaching and Other Academic Activities: Report to the HEFCE as Part of the Fundamental Review of Research Policy and Funding.” Bristol: HEFCE, 1999, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/research/review/sub/teach.pdf.
  40. HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England). Fundamental Review of Research Policy and Funding, Report 00/37. Bristol: HEFCE, 2000, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/Pubs/hefce/2000/00_37.htm.
  41. Hossler, D., J. Braxton, and G. Coopersmith. “Understanding Student College Choice.” In Smart, J.C. (ed.). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. V. New York: Agathon Press, 1989, 231-288.Google Scholar
  42. Hossler, D. and L.H. Litten. Mapping the Higher Education Landscape. New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1993.Google Scholar
  43. Hoxby, C.M. “How the Changing Market Structure of US Higher Education Explains College Tuition.” NBER Working Paper 6323, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1997, http://www.nber.org/papers/w6323.
  44. Hoxby, C.M. “The Return to Attending a More Selective College: 1960 to the Present.” Harvard University, 2001, http://post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/hoxby/papers/whole.pdf.
  45. Hoxby, C.M. “The Effects of Geographic Integration and Increasing Competition on the Market for College Education.” Harvard University, 2002, http://post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/hoxby/papers/exp_tuit.pdf.
  46. Jenkins, A. “The Research Assessment Exercise, Funding and Teaching Quality.” Quality Assurance in Education 3 (1995): 4-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Johnes, G. and M. Cave. “The Development of Competition among Higher Education Institutions.” In Bartlett, W., C. Propper, D. Wilson, and J. Le Grand (eds). Quasi-markets in the Welfare State: The Emerging Findings. Bristol: SAUS Publications, 1994, 95-120.Google Scholar
  48. Johnstone, R.B. “Cost-sharing and Equity in Higher Education: Implications of Income-Contingency Loans.” In Teixeira, P., B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, and A. Amaral (eds). Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 2004, 37-59.Google Scholar
  49. Kuh, G. “What We’re Learning About Student Engagement from NSSE.” Change 35 (2003): 24-32.Google Scholar
  50. Kuh, G.D. and E.T. Pascarella. “What Does Institutional Selectivity Tell Us About Educational Quality?” Change 36 (2004): 52-58.Google Scholar
  51. Le Grand, J. and W. Bartlett. Quasi-markets and Social Policy. London: Macmillan, 1993.Google Scholar
  52. Lindsay, G. and T. Rodgers. “Market Orientation in the UK Higher Education Sector: The Influence of the Education Reform Process 1979-1993.” Quality in Higher Education 4 (1998): 159-171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Manski, C.F. and D.A. Wise. College Choice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  54. Marsh, H.W. and J. Hattie. “The Relation Between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness.” Journal of Higher Education 73 (2002): 603-641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maslen, G. “V-C Says Scrap State Red Tape.” Times Higher Education Supplement, 15 September, 2000.Google Scholar
  56. Massy, W.F. Honoring the Trust: Quality and Cost Containment in Higher Education. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
  57. Massy, W.F. “Markets in Higher Education: Do They Promote Internal Efficiency?” In Teixeira, P., B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, and A. Amaral (eds). Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 2004, 13-35.Google Scholar
  58. McDonough, P.M., A.L. Antonio and L.X. Perez. “College Rankings: Democratized College Knowledge for Whom?” Research in Higher Education 39 (1998): 513-537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McNay, I. “The Paradoxes of Research Assessment and Funding.” In Henkel, M. and B. Little (eds). Changing Relationships between Higher Education and the State. London: Jessica Kingsley, 1999, 191-203.Google Scholar
  60. Moogan, Y.J., S. Baron, and K. Harris. “Decision-making Behaviour of Potential Higher Education Students.” Higher Education Quarterly 53 (1999): 211-228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Niklasson, L. “Quasi-markets in Higher Education: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 18 (1996): 7-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. North, D. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  63. Pascarella, E.T. “Identifying Excellence in Undergraduate Education: Are We Even Close?” Change 33 (2001): 19-23.Google Scholar
  64. Pascarella, E.T. and P.T. Terenzini. How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights From Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991.Google Scholar
  65. Pascarella, E.T. and P.T. Terenzeni. How College Affects Students: A Third Generation of Research, 2nd edn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005.Google Scholar
  66. Paulsen, M.B. “College Choice: Understanding Student Enrollment Behavior.” ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6, Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development, 1990.Google Scholar
  67. Rolfe, H. “University Strategy in an Age of Uncertainty: The Effect of Higher Education Funding on Old and New Universities.” Higher Education Quarterly 57 (2003): 24-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rosovsky, H. and M. Hartley. Evaluation and the Academy: Are We Doing the Right Thing? Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2002.Google Scholar
  69. Rothschild, M. and L.J. White. “The Analytics of the Pricing of Higher Education and Other Services in Which the Customers are Inputs.” Journal of Political Economy 103 (1995): 573-586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sarrico, C.S., S.M. Hogan, R.G. Dyson, and A.D. Athanassopoulos. “Data Envelope Analysis and University Selection.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 48 (1997): 1163-1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith, J., A. McKnight, and R. Naylor. “Graduate Employability: Policy and Performance in Higher Education in the UK.” Economic Journal 110 (2000): 382-411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Teixeira, P., B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, and A. Amaral (eds). Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 2004.Google Scholar
  73. Terenzini, P.T. and E.T. Pascarella. “Living with Myths: Undergraduate Education in America.” Change 26 (1994): 28-32.Google Scholar
  74. Trow, M. “From Mass Higher Education to Universal Access: The American Advantage.” Minerva 37 (2000): 303-328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Williams, G.L. Changing Patterns of Finance in Higher Education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  76. Williams, G.L. “The Higher Education Market in the United Kingdom.” In Teixeira, P., B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, and A. Amaral (eds). Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, 2004, 241-269.Google Scholar
  77. Winston, G.C. and D.J. Zimmerman. “Peer Effects in Higher Education.” NBER Working Paper 9501, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2003, http://www.nber.org/papers/w9501.
  78. Witzel, M.L. “The Failure of an Internal Market: The Universities Funding Council Bid System.” Public Money and Management 11 (1991): 41-49.Google Scholar
  79. Yorke, M. “A Good League Table Guide?” Quality Assurance in Education 5 (1997): 61-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yorke, M., G. Barnett, P. Bridges, P. Evanson, C. Haines, D. Jenkins, P. Knight, D. Scurry, M. Stowell, and H. Woolf. “Does Grading Method Influence Honours Degree Classification?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (2002): 269-279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zemsky, R and P. Oedel. The Structure of College Choice. New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David D. Dill
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North CarolinaUSA

Personalised recommendations