Advertisement

Multibody Analysis of Axially Elastic Rod Chains

  • Erno Keskinen
  • Veli-Tapani Kuokkala
  • Taina Vuoristo
  • Matti Martikainen
Conference paper
Part of the IUTAM Bookseries book series (IUTAMBOOK, volume 1)

Abstract

Axially elastic rods are basic machine elements in hydraulic hammers, pilers and percussive drills [1]. The problem to analyze the motion history of such mechanisms is a very complex one, because the rods are simultaneously in large amplitude axial motion superimposed with a small amplitude elastic wave motion. The wave motion experiences division to reflected and transmitted components at each rod-rod interface depending on the current boundary stiffness [2]. The wave motion in each rod can be computed by finite elements or alternatively in space of semidefinite eigenfunctions. The feasibility of these methods in solving wave propagation problems in multi-rod systems with nonlinearly behaving rod-rod interfaces has been investigated and evaluated. The object of the experimental case study is a classical Hopkinson split bar apparatus [3] used in experimental analysis of material response to shock pulses. Another example representing a pile hammering system [4] evaluates the computational performance of the proposed approaches in long-term simulation of a complete work process.

Keywords

Interface Element Experimental Case Study Uniform Line Floating Frame Hydraulic Hammer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Keskinen, E.K., Keskiniva, M., Raitaniemi M., and Raunisto Y. (1996) “Design and Analysis of a Multipurpose Double-Acting Hammering Unit for Hydraulic Excavators.” Proc. of the 3rd biennal ASME ESDA’ 96 conf., Montpellier.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doyle, J.F. (1997) Wave Propagation in Structures, Springer, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kolsky, H. (1949), “An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading,” Proceedings of the Physical Society Section B, 62, pp 676–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koerner, R.M. (1984) Construction and Geotechnical Methods in Foundation Engineering. McGraw-Hill, N.Y.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meirovitch, L. (1986) Elements of Vibration Analysis, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nemat-Nasser S. (editor) (2000) “High strain rate testing”, in ASM handbook Vol. 8, Mechanical testing and evaluation, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, pp. 425–496.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frew D. J., Forrestal M. J., Chen W. (2002) “Pulse shaping techniques for testing brittle materials with a Split Hopkinson pressure bar” Experimental Mechanics, 42, pp. 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vuoristo, T. and Kuokkala, V.-T. (2002) “Creep, recovery and high strain rate response of soft roll cover materials” Mechanics of Materials, 34, pp. 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bowles, J.E. (1988) Foundation Analysis and Design, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erno Keskinen
    • 1
  • Veli-Tapani Kuokkala
    • 2
  • Taina Vuoristo
    • 2
  • Matti Martikainen
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Machine DynamicsTampere University of TechnologyTampereFinland
  2. 2.Laboratory of Material CharacterizationTampere University of TechnologyTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations