Spectrum Sharing Games of Network Operators and Cognitive Radios

  • Mohammad Hossein Manshaei
  • Márk Félegyházi
  • Julien Freudiger
  • Jean-Pierre Hubaux
  • Peter Marbach

Since the beginning of the 20th century, the wireless frequency spectrum has been carefully controlled by government regulators. In response to the recent advances in radio technology, the spectrum regulators have opened some parts of the available spectrum for unlicensed usage. In addition, they have reformed the traditional command and control regulation policies and have allowed more opportunistic transmissions over unused spectrum bandwidth in licensed bands, for certain times and locations. This paradigm shift can lead to a more flexible and efficient spectrum sharing in the near future. In this chapter, we address the problem of spectrum sharing between network operators and cognitive radios. Because of the dynamic nature of spectrum sharing, it is difficult to analyze and to provide sound spectrum management schemes. Several researchers rely on game theory that is an appropriate tool for modelling strategic interactions between rational decisionmakers (e.g., spectrum sharing in wireless networks). We present a selected set of works to highlight the usefulness of game theory in solving the main problems in this field.


Nash Equilibrium Cognitive Radio Power Allocation Primary User Mobile User 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Axelrod. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Buttyan and J. -P. Hubaux. Security and Cooperation in Wireless Networks, Thwarting Malicious and Selfish Behavior in the Age of Ubiquitous Computing. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Cao and H. Zheng. Distributed Spectrum Allocation via Local Bargaining. In SECON, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Etkin, A. P. Parekh, and D. Tse. Spectrum Sharing in Unlicensed Bands. IEEE JSAC on Adaptive, Spectrum Agile and Cognitive Wireless Networks, April 2007.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Federal Communications Commission. Amendment of the Commission’s Rules to Establish New Personal Communications Services. Technical Report 90-314, Federal Communications Commission, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Félegyházi. Non-cooperative Behavior in Wireless Networks. PhD thesis, EPFL -Switzerland, April 2007.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Félegyházi, M. Cagalj, D. Dufour, and J. -P. Hubaux. Border Games in Cellular Networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2007.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Félegyházi and J. -P. Hubaux. Wireless Operators in a Shared Spectrum. In IEEE INFOCOM, April 23-29 2006.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Fette. Cognitive Radio Technology. Newnes, 2006.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole. Game Theory. MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability -A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman, 1979.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Gibbons. A Primer in Game Theory. Prentice Hall, 1992.MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. M. Halldorsson, J. Y. Halpern, L. E. Li, and V. S. Mirrokni. On Spectrum Sharing Games. In ACM PODC, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Z. Han, Z. Ji, and K. J. R. Liu. Non-Cooperative Resource Competition Game by Virtual Referee in Multi-Cell OFDMA Networks. IEEE JSAC, Non-cooperative Behavior in Networking, (2nd Quarter), 2007.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Hardin. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162:1243-1248, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Haykin. Cognitive Radio: Brain-Empowered Wireless Communications. JSAC, 23(2):201-220, February 2005.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Huang, R. Berry, and M. L. Honig. Auction-based Spectrum Sharing. ACM/Springer (MONET), 11(3):405-418, June 2006.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    X. Huang and B. Bensaou. On Max-min Fairness and Scheduling in Wireless Ad-hoc Networks: Analytical Framework and Implementation. In ACM Mobicom, April 2001.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. E. Hundt and G. L. Rosston. Spectrum flexibility will promote competition and the publicinterest. IEEE Communications Magazine, 33, December 1995.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Mitola III. Cognitive Radio Architecture: The Engineering Foundations of Radio XML. Wiley, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Koutsoupias and C-H. Papadimitriou. Worst-case equilibria. In 16th Annual Conf. Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, 1999.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Mas-Colell, M. D. Whinston, and J. R. Green. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford  Univ. Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Nash. Equilibrium Points in N -person Games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36:48-49, 1950.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Nash. Non-Cooperative Games. The Annals of Mathematics, 54(2):286-295, 1951.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein. A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    C. Peng, H. Zheng, and B. Y. Zhao. Utilization and Fairness in Spectrum Assignement for Opportunistic Spectrum Access. In Mobile Networks and Applications, 2006.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    T. S. Rappaport. Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice (2nd Edition). Prentice Hall, 2002.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shared Spectrum Company SSC. Dynamic Spectrum Sharing. In Presentation to IEEE Communications Society, 2005.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    T. A. Weiss and F. K. Jondral. Spectrum Pooling: An Innovative Strategy for the Enhancement of Spectrum Efficiency. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 42, 2004.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    A. Zemlianov and G. de Veciana. Cooperation and Decision Making in Wireless Multi-provider Setting. In INFOCOM, 2005.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    J. Zhao, H. Zheng, and G. H. Yang. Distributed Coordination in Dynamic Spectrum Allocation Networks. In DySPAN, 2005.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    H. Zheng and L. Cao. Device-centric Spectrum Management. In DySPAN, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Hossein Manshaei
    • 1
  • Márk Félegyházi
    • 1
  • Julien Freudiger
    • 1
  • Jean-Pierre Hubaux
    • 1
  • Peter Marbach
    • 2
  1. 1.EPFLSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of TorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations