This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Asher, N.: 1993, Reference to Abstract Objects in English: a Philosophical Semantics for Natural Language Metaphysics, Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Bohlin, P., R. Cooper, E. Engdahl, and S. Larsson: 1999, ‘Information states and dialogue move engines’. Gothenburg Papers in Computational Linguistics.
Carlson, L.: 1983, Dialogue Games, Synthese Language Library. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Chung, S., B. Ladusaw, and J. McCloskey: 1995, ‘Sluicing and Logical Form’. Natural Language Semantics 3: 239–282.
Cooper, R., S. Larsson, J. Hieronymus, S. Ericsson, E. Engdahl, and P. Ljunglof: 2001, ‘GODIS and Questions Under Discussion’. In: The TRINDI Book. Available from http://www.ling.gu.se/research/projects/trindi.
Cooper, R., S. Larsson, M. Poesio, D. Traum, and C. Matheson: 1999, ‘Coding Instructional Dialogue for Information States’. In: The TRINDI Book. Available from http://www.ling.gu.se/research/projects/trindi.
Dalrymple, M., F. Pereira, and S. Shieber: 1991, ‘Ellipsis and Higher Order Unification’. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 399–452.
Ebert, C., S. Lappin, H. Gregory, and N. Nicolov: 2004, ‘Full Paraphrase Generation for Fragments in Dialogue’. In: R. Smith and J. van Kuppevelt (eds.): Current and New Directions in Discourse and Dialogue. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Erbach, G.: 1995, ‘ProFIT: Prolog with Features, Inheritance and Templates’. In: Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference of the ACL. pp. 180– 187.
Fernández, R.: 2002, ‘An Implemented HPSG Grammar for SHARDS’. Technical Report TR-02-04, Department of Computer Science, King’s College London.
Fernández, R. and J. Ginzburg: 2002a, ‘Non-Sentential Utterances: A Corpus Study’. Traitement automatique des languages. Dialogue 43(2), 13–42.
Fernández, R. and J. Ginzburg: 2002b, ‘Non-Sentential Utterances: Grammar and Dialogue Dynamics in Corpus Annotation’. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING 2002. Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 253–259.
Fernández, R. and J. Ginzburg: 2002c, ‘Non-Sentential Utterances in Dialogue: A Corpus Study’. In: Proceedings of the Third SIGdial Workshop on Discurse and Dialogue, ACL’02. Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp. 15–26.
Fletcher, C.: 1994, ‘Levels of Representation in Memory for Discourse’. In: M.A. Gernsbacher (ed.) Handbook of Psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 589–607.
Gardent, C. and M. Kohlhase: 1997, ‘Computing Parallelism in Discourse’. In: Proceedings IJCAI’97. pp. 1016–1021.
Ginzburg, J.: 1996, ‘Interrogatives: Questions, Facts, and Dialogue’. In: S. Lappin (ed.): Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ginzburg, J.: 1999, ‘Ellipsis Resolution with Syntactic Presuppositions’. In: H. Bunt and R. Muskens (eds.): Computing Meaning, Volume 1. pp. 255 279– . . Kluwer,
Ginzburg, J. and R. Cooper: 2004, ‘Clarification, Ellipsis, and the Nature of Contextual Updates’. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(3), 297–366.
Ginzburg, J., H. Gregory, and S. Lappin: 2001, ‘SHARDS: Fragment Resolution in Dialogue’. In: H. Bunt, I. van der Sluis, and E. Thijsse (eds.): Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computational Semantics. Tilburg, pp. 156–172.
Ginzburg, J. and I. Sag: 2001, Interrogative Investigations. CSLI Publications.
Gregory, H. and S. Lappin: 1999, ‘Antecedent Contained Ellipsis in HPSG’. In: Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 331–356.
Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1997, ‘Questions’. In: J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 1055–1124.
Grosz, B., A. Joshi, and S. Weinstein: 1995, ‘Centering: a framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse’. Computational Linguistics 21, 203–225.
Hobbs, J.: 1991, Literature and Cognition, Vol. 21. Stanford: CSLI Lecture Notes.
Kempson, R., W. Meyer-Viol, and D. Gabbay: 1999, ‘VP Ellipsis: Towards a Dynamic, Structural Account’. In: S. Lappin and E. Benmamoun (eds.): Fragments. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 175–223.
Krifka, M.: 1992, ‘A Framework for Focus-sensitive Quantification’. In: Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 2. Ithaca, NY, pp. 213–236, CLC Publications.
Lappin, S.: 2002, ‘Salience and Inference in Anaphora Resolution’. In: Fourth Discourse and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium, Lisbon. (Invited talk.)
Lappin, S. and H. Gregory: 1997, ‘A Computational Model of Ellipsis Resolution’. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Formal Grammar. Aix en Provence.
Lappin, S. and H.-H. Shih: 1996, ‘A Generalized Reconstruction Algorithm for Ellipsis Resolution’. In: Proceedings of COLING-96. pp. 687–692.
Larsson, S.: 2002, ‘Issue based Dialogue Management’. Ph.D. thesis, Gothenburg University.
Nielsen, L. A.: 2003, ‘A Corpus-based Study of Verb Phrase Ellipsis’. In: Proceedings of the 6th CLUK Colloquium. Edinburgh, UK, pp. 109–115.
Pollard, C. and I. Sag: 1994, Head Drieven Phrase Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press and CSLI Publications.
Pulman, S.: 1997, ‘Higher Order Unification and the Interpretation of Focus’. Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 73–115.
Purver, M.: 2004, The Theory and Use of Clarification Requests in Dialogue. PhD thesis. King’s College, University of London.
Purver, M., J. Ginzburg, and P. Healey: 2001, ‘On the Means for Clarification in Dialogue’. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACL SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, pp. 116–125.
Reinhart, T.: 1997, ‘Quantifier Scope: How Labor is divided between QR and Choice Functions’. Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 335–397.
Rooth, M.: 1993, ‘A theory of focus interpretation’. Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116.
Sag, I.: 1997, ‘English Relative Clause Constructions’. Journal of Linguistics 33, 431–484.
Vallduví, E.: 1992, The Informational Component. New York: Garland.
Webber, B.: 1991, ‘Structure and Ostension in the Interpretation of Discourse Deixis’. Language and Cognitive Processes 14, 107–135.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fernández, R., Ginzburg, J., Gregory, H., Lappin, S. (2008). Shards: Fragment Resolution In Dialogue. In: Bunt, H., Muskens, R. (eds) Computing Meaning. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 83. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5958-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5958-2_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5957-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5958-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)