Representation and Skill in Second Language Learners and Proficient Bilinguals



Switch Cost Memory Span Picture Naming Simon Task Naming Latency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abutalebi J., Cappa S. F., and Perani D. 2005. Functional neuroimaging of the bilingual brain. In Kroll, J. F., and De Groot, A. M. B. (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press. 497–515.Google Scholar
  2. Altarriba, J., and Mathis, K. M. 1997. Conceptual and lexical development in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36: 550–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balota, D. A. 1994. Visual word recognition: the journey from features to meaning. In Gernsbacher, M. (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press. 303–358.Google Scholar
  4. Bialystok, E. 1988. Levels of bilinguals and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental Psychology, 24: 560–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bialystok, E., and Codd, J. 1997. Cardinal limits evidence from language awareness and bilingualism for developing concepts of number. Cognitive Development, 12: 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bialystok, E. 1999. Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70: 636–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bialystok, E., and Martin, M. M. 2004. Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental Science,7: 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., and Viswanathan, M. 2004. Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: evidence from the Simon Task. Psychology and Aging, 19: 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bialystok, E. 2005. Consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development. In Kroll, J. F., and De Groot, A. M. B. (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press. 417–432.Google Scholar
  10. Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Grady, C., Chau, W., Ishii, R., Gunji, A., and Pantev, C. 2005. Effect of bilingualism on cognitive control in the Simon task: evidence from MEG. Neuroimage, 24: 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Birdsong, D. 1999. Introduction: whys and why nots of the critical period hypothesis. In Birdsong, D. (ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.1–22.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, H.-C., and Leung, Y.-S. 1989. Patterns of lexical processing in a nonnative language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15: 316–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Costa, A., Miozzo, M., Caramazza, A. 1999. Lexical selection in bilinguals: do words in the bilingual’s two lexicons compete for selection? Journal of Memory and Language, 41: 365–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costa, A., and Santesteban, M. 2004. Lexical access in bilingual speech production: evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50: 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Bruijn, E. R.A., Dijkstra, T., Chwilla, D. J., and Schriefers, H. J. 2001. Language context effects on interlingual homograph recognition: evidence from event-related potentials and response times in semantic priming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4: 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Groot, A. M. B. 1992. Determinants of word translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18: 1001–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Groot, A. M. B., and Poot, R. 1997. Word translation at three levels of proficiency in a second language: the ubiquitous involvement of conceptual memory. Language Learning, 47: 215–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DeKeyser, R. M. 2001. Automaticity and automatization. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. New York: Cambridge University Press. 125–151.Google Scholar
  19. Dijkstra, A., and Van Heuven, W. J. B. 1998. The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In Grainger, J., and Jacobs, A. M. (eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 189–225.Google Scholar
  20. Dijkstra, A., Van Jaarsveld, H., and Ten Brinke, S. 1998. Interlingual homograph recognition: effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1: 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dijkstra, T., De Bruijn, E., Schriefers, H., and Brinke, S. T. 2000. More on interlingual homograph recognition: Language intermixing versus explicitness of instruction. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3: 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dijkstra, A., and Van Heuven, W. J. B. 2002. The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: from identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5: 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dijkstra, T. 2005. Bilingual word recognition and lexical access. In Kroll, J. F., and De Groot, A. M. B. (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press. 179–201.Google Scholar
  24. Dufour, R., and Kroll, J. F. 1995. Matching words to concepts in two languages: a test of the concept mediation model of bilingual representation. Memory & Cognition, 23: 166–180.Google Scholar
  25. Flege, J. 1987. The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effects of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15: 47–65.Google Scholar
  26. Flege, J., Mono, M., and MacKay, I. 1995. The effect of age of second language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication 16: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Flege, J. E. 2003. Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In Meyer, A., and Schiller, N. (eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production, differences and similarities. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 319–355.Google Scholar
  28. Freed, B. 1995. Second Language Acquisition in a study abroad context. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  29. Frenck-Mestre, C., and Prince, P. 1997. Second language autonomy. Journal of Memory and Language, 37: 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedman, N. P., and Miyake, A. 2004. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: Alatent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133: 101–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gollan, T. H., and Silverberg, N. B. 2001. Tip-of-the-tongue states in Hebrew-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4: 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gollan, T. H., and Acenas, L. A. 2004. What is a TOT?: Cognate and translation effects on tip-of-the-tongue states in Spanish-English and Tagalog-English bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 30: 246–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Fennema-Notestine, C., and Morris, S. K. 2005. Bilingualism affects picture naming but not picture classification. Memory & Cognition, 33: 1220–1234.Google Scholar
  34. Green, D. W. 1998. Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1: 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grosjean, F. 2001. The bilingual’s language modes. In Nicol, J. L. (ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers. 49–71.Google Scholar
  36. Hasegawa, M., Carpenter, P. A., and Just, M. A. 2002. An fMRI study of bilingual sentence comprehension and workload. NeuroImage, 15: 647–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hermans, D., Bongaerts, T., De Bot, K., and Schreuder, R. 1998. Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1: 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jared, D. and Kroll, J. F. 2001. Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words? Journal of Memory and Language, 44: 2–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jared, D., and Szucs, C. 2002. Phonological activation in bilinguals: Evidence from interlingual homograph naming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5: 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson, J. S., and Newport, E. 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21: 60–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S., and Wodniecka, Z. in press. Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.Google Scholar
  43. Kroll, J. F., and Curley, J. 1988. Lexical memory in novice bilinguals: the role of concepts in retrieving second language words. In Gruneberg, M., Morris, P., and Sykes, R. (eds.), Practical aspects of memory Vol. 2. London: John Wiley & Sons. 389–395.Google Scholar
  44. Kroll, J. F., Dijkstra, A., Janssen, N., and Schriefers, H. in preparation. Selecting the language in which to speak: Cued-picture naming experiments on lexical access in bilingual production.Google Scholar
  45. Kroll, J. F., and Stewart, E. 1994. Category interference in translation and picture naming: evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33: 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kroll, J. F., Michael, E., Tokowicz, N., and Dufour, R. 2002. The development of lexical fluency in a second language. Second Language Research, 18: 137–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kroll, J. F., Sumutka, B. M., and Schwartz, A. I. 2005. A cognitive view of the bilingual lexicon: reading and speaking words in two languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9: 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Linck, J. A., and Kroll, J. F. 2005. Language processing during study abroad: evidence for increased inhibitory control. Paper presented at the Fifth International Symposium on Bilingualism, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  49. Logan, G. D. 1988. Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95: 492–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. MacWhinney, B. 1997. Second language acquisition and the competition model. In De Groot, A. M. B., and Kroll, J. F. (eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: psycholinguistic perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers. 113–142.Google Scholar
  51. Marian, V., and Spivey, M. J. 2003. Competing activation in bilingual language processing: within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6: 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McClelland, J. L., and Rumelhart, D. E. 1981. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception, Part 1: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88: 375–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., and Kim, A. 2004. Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7: 703–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mechelli, A., Crinion, J. T., Noppeney, U., O’Doherty, J., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S. K., and Price, C. J. 2004. Structural plasticity in the bilingual brain: proficiency in a second language and age at acquisition affect grey-matter density. Nature, 431: 757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Meuter and Allport 1999. Bilingual Language Switching in Naming: Asymmetrical Costs of Language Selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40: 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Michael, E., Dijkstra, T., and Kroll, J. F. in preparation. Individual differences in working memory and bilingual control processes.Google Scholar
  57. Miyake, A., and Friedman, N. P. 1998. Individual differences in second language proficiency: The role of working memory. In Healy, A. F., and Bourne, L. E. Jr. (eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 339–364.Google Scholar
  58. Pienemann, M. 1998. Language processing and second language development: processability theory. Benjamins: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  59. Potter, M. C., So, K.-F., Von Eckardt, B., and Feldman, L. B. 1984. Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and more proficient bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23: 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rogers, R. D., and Monsell, S. 1995. Cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: general, 124: 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schneider, W., and Shiffrin, R. M. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84: 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schwartz, A. I., and Kroll, J. F. in press. Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language.Google Scholar
  63. Schwartz, A. I., Kroll, J. F., and Diaz, M. in press. Reading words in Spanish and English: mapping orthography to phonology in two languages. Language and Cognitive Processes.Google Scholar
  64. Segalowitz, N., and Freed, B. F. 2004. Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26: 173–199.Google Scholar
  65. Segalowitz, N., and Hulstijn, J. 2005. Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In Kroll, J. F., and De Groot, A. M. B. (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches, 371–388.Google Scholar
  66. Segalowitz, N. S., and Segalowitz, S. J. 1993. Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14: 369–385.Google Scholar
  67. Segalowitz, S. J., Segalowitz, N. S., and Wood, A. G. 1998. Assessing the development of automaticity in second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19: 53–67.Google Scholar
  68. Simon, J. R., and Rudell, A. P. 1967. Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51: 300–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sunderman, G., and Kroll, J. F. in press. First language activation during second language lexical processing: An investigation of lexical form, meaning, and grammatical class. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.Google Scholar
  70. Talamas, A., Kroll, J. F., and Dufour, R. 1999. Form related errors in second language learning: A preliminary stage in the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2: 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tokowicz, N., Michael, E., and Kroll, J. F. 2004. The roles of study abroad experience and working memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7: 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Turner, M. L., and Engle, R. W. 1989. Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28: 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ullman, M. T. 2004. Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92: 231–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Van Hell, J. G., and Dijkstra, A. 2002. Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9: 780–789.Google Scholar
  75. Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, T., and Grainger, J. 1998. Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39: 458–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Von Studnitz, R. E., and Green, D. 2002. Interlingual homograph interference in German-English bilinguals: its modulation and locus of control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weber-Fox, C. M., and Neville, H. J. 1996. Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8: 231–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Pennsylvania State University

Personalised recommendations