Task and Context Effects in Bilingual Lexical Processing



Target Word Lexical Decision Lexical Decision Task Semantic Priming N400 Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altarriba, J., Kroll, J., Sholl, A., and Rayner, K. 1996. The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: evidence from eye-fixation and naming times. Memory & Cognition, 24: 477–492.Google Scholar
  2. Barch, D. M., Sabb, F. W., Braver, T. S., and Noll, D. C. 2000. Anterior cingulate and the monitoring of response conflict: evidence from an fMRI study of verb generation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12: 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, M., Carter, C. S., and Cohen, J. D. 2001. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108: 624–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruijn, E. R. A. 2006. Testing a model for bilingual semantic priming with interlingual homographs: RT and N400 effects. Brain Research, 1068: 170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P., and Lupker, S. J. 2000. The processing of interlexical homographs in a bilingual and a monolingual task: support for nonselective access to bilingual memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53: 397–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dijkstra, A., Brummelhuis, B., and Lemhöfer, K. in preparation. Task-dependent orthographic similarity effects in cognates.Google Scholar
  7. Dijkstra, A., and Van Heuven, W. J. B. in press. On language and brain! Or on (psycho)linguists and neuroscientists? Language Learning.Google Scholar
  8. Dijkstra, A., and Van Heuven, W. J. B. 1998. The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In Grainger, J., and Jacobs, A. M. (eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 189–225.Google Scholar
  9. Dijkstra, A., Van Heuven, W. J. B., and Grainger, J. 1998a. Simulating competitor effects with the bilingual interactive activation model. Psychologica Belgica, 38: 177–196.Google Scholar
  10. Dijkstra, A., Van Jaarsveld, H., and Ten Brinke, S. 1998b. Interlingual homograph recognition: effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1: 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dijkstra, A., Grainger, J., and Van Heuven, W. J. B. 1999. Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: the neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41: 496–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dijkstra, A., De Bruijn, E., Schriefers, H. J., and Ten Brinke, S. 2000a. More on interlingual homograph recognition: language intermixing versus explicitness of instruction. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3: 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dijkstra, A., and Van Hell, J. 2003. Testing the language mode hypothesis using trilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6: 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dijkstra, A., and Snoeren, N. 2004. Appartenance linguistique dans la reconnaissance et la production des mots ches les bilingues. In Ferrand, L., and Grainger, J. (eds.), Psycholinguistique cognitive: Essais en l’honneur de Juan Segui. Bruxelles: De Boeck and Larcier s.a: 377–399.Google Scholar
  15. Gehring, W. J., and Fencsik, D. E. 2001. Functions of the medial frontal cortex in the processing of conflict and errors. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21(23): 9430–9437.Google Scholar
  16. Grainger, J., and Dijkstra, A. 1992. On the representation and use of language information in bilinguals. In Harris, R. J. (ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals Amsterdam: Elsevier: 207–220.Google Scholar
  17. Grosjean, F. 1997. Processing mixed language: issues, findings and models. In De Groot, A. M. B., and Kroll, J. F. (eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 225–254.Google Scholar
  18. Grosjean, F., Li, P., Münte, Th., and Rodriguez-Fornells, A. 2003. Imaging bilinguals: when the neurosciences meet the language sciences. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6: 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kerkhofs, R., Dijkstra, A.F.J., Chwilla, D.J., and De Bruijn, E.R.A. 2006. Testing a model for bilingual semantic priming with interlingual homographs: RT and N400 effects. Brain Research, 1068: 170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lemhöfer, K., and Dijkstra, A. 2004. Recognizing cognates and interlingual homographs: effects of code similarity in language specific and generalized lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 32: 533–550.Google Scholar
  21. Paradis, M. 2004. A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Studies in bilingualism (Vol. 18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  22. Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Rotte, M., Heinze, H.-J., Nösselt, T., and Münte, T. F. 2002. Brain potential and functional MRI evidence for how to handle two languages with one brain. Nature, 415: 1026–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rodriguez-Fornells, A., van der Lugt, A., Rotte, M., Britti, B., Heinze, H. J., and Munte, T. F. 2005. Second language interferes with word production in fluent bilinguals: brain potential and functional imaging evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17: 422–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schulpen, B., Dijkstra, A., Schriefers, H. J., and Hasper, M. 2003. Recognition of interlingual homophones in bilingual auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29: 1155–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schwartz, A. I., and Kroll, J. F. submitted. Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context.Google Scholar
  26. Van Hell, J. G. 1998. Cross-language processing and bilingual memory organization.Google Scholar
  27. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis of the University of Nijmegen: 61–90.Google Scholar
  28. Van Hell, J. G. 1998. Cross-language processing and bilingual memory organization. Doctoral Thesis, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  29. Van Hell, J. G., and Dijkstra, A. 2002. Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9: 780–789.Google Scholar
  30. Van Heuven, W. J. B., Dijkstra, A., and Grainger, J. 1998. Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39: 458–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Heuven, W. J. B., Schriefers, H., Dijkstra, A., and Hagoort, P. submitted. Language conflict in the bilingual brain.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and InformationNijmegen

Personalised recommendations