Skip to main content

School Reform and Inequality in Urban Australia

A Case of Residualising the Poor

  • Chapter
International Studies in Educational Inequality, Theory and Policy

Abstract

Over the past three decades, government schools in Australia have been exposed to the effects of several major public policy reforms aimed at improving school performance. One is the well-documented push to marketisation or the re-organisation of school management around ‘market’ principles (see, for example, Whitty, Power & Halpin, 1998). Greater autonomy for schools through devolution of decision making, the introduction of school councils, a focus on school-based management, and the easing of restrictions on school catchment boundaries to enhance parental choice were all initiated with the promise of promoting more effective schools through increased competition. Another is the push to privatisation through increasing the levels of public funding to private providers, or what could be described as the public funding of private effort in the delivery of schooling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Auditor General of Victoria. (1995). The Changing Profile of State Education: School Reorganizations. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2001). Australian Standard Geographical Classification(ASGC Catalogue No. 1216.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2003). Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2001 [Cat. No. 2033.0.30.001]. Canberra: ABS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2005, and previous years). Schools Australia 2004 (Catalogue 4221.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, G. (2001, 28-30 March). Trends in educational expenditure [On line]. Paper presented at the Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association 2001 Conference. Available at: http://www.avetra.org.au/abstracts_and_papers_2001/Burke_full.pdf

  • Butts, R. F. (1955). Assumptions Underlying Australian Education. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. (1998). Self-managing Schools and Improved Learning Outcomes. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. & Roskam, J. (2002). Australia’s Education Choices: A Report to the Menzies Research Centre. Sydney: The Menzies Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claydon, L.F. (Ed.). (1975). The Urban School. Carlton, Victoria: Pitman Pacific Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C., Kenway, J., & McLeod, J. (2000). Factors Influencing the Educational Performance of Males and Females in School and their Initial Destinations after Leaving School[On line]. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education Science and Training. Available: http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/F0270F6E-B2C3-4CF4-833D-4C8029EA7D6E/4093/Gender_Report.pdf

  • Commonwealth Schools Commission (1985). Choice and Diversity in Government Schooling: Collected papers of a special project of the Commonwealth Schools Commission and state and territory education authorities, on choice and diversity in government schooling, 1979-1984. Canberra: Commonwealth Schools Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Community Education Committee, Victoria (1979). Community education policies and guidelines for school-based programs. Prepared by the Community Education Committee for the Victorian Education Department. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R.W., Ashenden, D., Kessler, S., & Dowsett, G. (1982). Making the Difference: Schools, Families and Social Division. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, K. (1996). School Size, School Climate, and Student Performance (Close Up # 20). Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deller, S.C., & Rudnicki, E. (1993). Production efficiency in elementary education: The case of Maine schools. Economics of Education Review, 12, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Victoria. (1994). Students in new schools enjoy expanded opportunities(News Release from the Office of the Minister for Education, August 2 1994) [On line]. Available: http://www.dpc.vic.gov.au/domino/Web_Notes/pressrel.nsf/d098b6879550b54c4a25620d002cdbc8/fa2848f387a1c0104a2561f100397f19!OpenDocument

  • Directorate of School Education. (1992). Evaluation of School Reorganization: Interim Report for the Minister of School Education (Vol. 1). Melbourne, Victoria: Directorate of School Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Directorate of School Education, Victoria. (1993). Schools of the future: Preliminary paper. Melbourne: Directorate of School Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, W.J. (1995). School size and student outcomes. In H.J. Walberg (Series Ed.) & B. Levin, W.J. Fowler, Jr., & H.J. Walberg (Vol. Eds.), Advances in Educational Productivity: Vol. 5. Organizational Influences on Educational Productivity. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc., 3-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel Modelling in Educational and Social Research. London: Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, W. (1985). Democratic Curriculum: Essays on Schooling and Society. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, M. & Winter, G. (2002). Commonwealth funding for schools since 1996. [On line]. Available: www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/RN/2001-02/02rn48.htm.

  • Independent Schools Council of Australia. (2004). Independent Update Issue 4: Choice and Diversity Need Support. Canberra: Independent Schools Council of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmel, P. (Chair). (1973). Schools in Australia. Report of the Interim Committee of the Australian Schools Commission. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, J., Lamb, S., & Clark, K. (2005). Student resource package for non-traditional locations: Summary report to the Department of Education and Training. Melbourne: Centre for Post-compulsory education and lifelong learning, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S., & Fullarton, S. (2002). Classroom and school factors affecting mathematics achievement: A comparative study of Australia and the United States using TIMSS. Australian Journal of Education, 46 (2), 154-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S., Rumberger, R., Jesson, D., & Teese, R. (2004a). School performance in Australia: results from analyses of school effectiveness. Report for the Victorian Department of Premier and Cabinet, Melbourne, Victoria. Available: http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/govrel/reports/schoolperformance-rpt.pdf

  • Lamb, S., Long, M., & Baldwin, G. (2004). Performance of the Australian education and training system. Report for the Victorian Department of Premier and Cabinet, Melbourne, Victoria. Available: http://www.dpc.vic.gov.au/CA256D800027B102/Lookup/CommonwealthStateRelationsreport/$file/perf%20of%20aust%20education.pdf

  • Lamb, S., Walstab, A., Teese, R., Vickers, M., & Rumberger, R. (2004b). Staying on at school: improving student retention in Australia [On line]. Brisbane: Queensland Department of Education and the Arts. Available: http://www.mceetya.edu.au/verve/_resources/studentretention_main_file.pdf

  • Lee, V.E., & Smith, J.B. (1997). High school size: What works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19 (3), 205-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerial Council on Employment, Education Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (2004). Key statistics on Australian schooling(and previous years) [On line]. Available: http://cms.curriculum.edu.au/anr2004/pdfs/2004appendix1_stats.pdf

  • Ministerial Review of Post-compulsory Schooling, Victoria. (1985). Report of the Ministerial Review of Post-compulsory Schooling. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Training, Victoria. (1989). District provision. Comprehensive curriculum provision within a district: School reorganization. Melbourne, Victoria: Ministry of Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education and Training, Victoria. (1991). District provision. District Reviews of Curriculum Provision (Booklets 1 - 6). Melbourne, Victoria: Ministry of Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. (2004, August 26). Making schools better[On line]. Speech by Dr Brendan Nelson, Australian Government Minister for Education, Science and Training at the Making Schools Better Conference, University of Melbourne. Available: http://www.dest.gov.au/ministers/media/nelson/2004/08/n901260804.asp

  • Novak, J. (2006). Choice matters: What needs to change to make schools competitive? [On line]. Policy Magazine, 22 (1), 3-28. Sydney: Centre for Independent Studies. Available: www.cis.org.au/Policy/autumn06/autumn06_05.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2001). Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2005). Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators 2005. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plecki, M. (1991, April 3-7). The relationship between elementary school size and student achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey, M. (1975). Dynamics of Bureaucracy. Brisbane: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Method (2nd Edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steifel, L., Berne, R., Iatarola, O., & Frucher, N. (2000). High school size: Effects on budgets and performance in New York City. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(1), 27-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teese, R., Davies, M., Charlton, M., & Polesel, J. (1995). Who Wins at School? Boys and Girls in Australian Secondary Education Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teese, R., McLean, G., & Polesel, J. (1993). Equity outcomes: A report to the Schools Council’s Task Force on a broadbanded equity program for schools. National Board of Employment, Education and Training. Canberra: Commonwealth Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teese, R., Polesel, J. & Helme, S. (2005). Planning for post-compulsory provision: Identifying the challenges and exploring the options. Melbourne: Centre for Post-compulsory education and lifelong learning, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty,G. , Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and Choice in Education: The School, the State and the Market. Camberwell, Vic.: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lamb, S. (2007). School Reform and Inequality in Urban Australia. In: Teese, R., Lamb, S., Duru-Bellat, M., Helme, S. (eds) International Studies in Educational Inequality, Theory and Policy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5916-2_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics