# Contributions from Cross-National Comparative Studies to the Internationalization of Mathematics Education: Studies of Chinese and U.S. Classrooms

## Abstract

Cross-national studies offer a unique contribution to the internationalization of mathematics education. In particular, they provide mathematics educators with opportunities to situate the teaching and learning mathematics in a wider cultural context and to reflect on generalization of theories and practices of teaching and learning mathematics that have been developed in particular countries. In this chapter, we discuss a series of cross-national studies involving Chinese and U.S. students that illustrate to how cultural differences in Chinese and U.S. teachers’ teaching practices and beliefs affect the nature of their students’ mathematical performance. We do this by showing that the types of mathematical representations teachers present to students strongly influence the choice of representations students use to solve problems. Specifically, the Chinese teachers overwhelmingly used symbolic representations of instructional tasks, whereas the U.S. teachers relied almost exclusively on verbal explanations and pictorial representations, illustrating that mathematics teaching is local practice which takes place in settings that are both socially and culturally constrained. These results demonstrate the social and cultural nature of teachers’ pedagogical practice

### Keywords

cross-national studies internationalization Chinese and U.S. Classrooms mathematical problem solving solution representations pedagogical representations## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

### References

- Atweh, B., & Clarkson, P. (2001). Internationalization and globalization of mathematics education: Toward an agenda for research/action. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres, (Eds.),
*Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective*, (pp. 77–94). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Ball, D. L. (1993). Halves, pieces, and troths: Constructing and using representational contexts in teaching fractions. In T. P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. A. Romberg, (Eds.),
*Rational numbers: An**integration of research,*(pp. 328–375). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Baroody, A. J. (1990) How and when should place-value concepts and skills be taught?
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,*21, 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Becker, J. P., Sawada, T., & Shimizu, Y. (1999). Some findings of the U.S.-Japan cross-cultural research on students’ problem-solving behaviors. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna, & I. Huntley, (Eds.),
*International comparisons in mathematics education,*(pp. 121–139). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar - Bruner, J. (1996).
*The culture of education.*Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar - Burrill, G. (1997). The NCTM standards: Eight years later.
*School Science and Mathematics,*97(6), 335–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cai, J. (1995).
*A cognitive analysis of U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical performance on tasks involving computation, simple problem solving, and complex problem solving, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*monograph series 7), National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.Google Scholar - Cai, J. (2000a). Mathematical thinking involved in U.S. and Chinese students’ solving processconstrained and process-open problems.
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning,*2, 309–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cai, J. (2000b). Understanding and representing the arithmetic averaging algorithm: An analysis and comparison of U.S. and Chinese students’ responses.
*International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology*, 31, 839–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cai, J. (2001). Improving mathematics learning: Lessons from cross-national studies of U.S. and Chinese students.
*Phi Delta Kappan,*82(5), 400–405.Google Scholar - Cai, J. (2004). Why do U.S. and Chinese students think differently in mathematical problem solving? Exploring the impact of early algebra learning and teachers’ beliefs.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior,*23, 135–167.Google Scholar - Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2002). U.S. and Chinese students’generalized and generative thinking in mathematical problem solving and problem posing.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior,*21(4), 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cai, J., & Lester, F. K. (2005). Solution and pedagogical representations in Chinese and U.S. classrooms.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior*, 24(3–4), 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1996). On different facets of mathematical thinking. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev, (Eds.),
*The nature of mathematical thinking,*(pp. 253–284). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Dufour-Janvier, B., Bednarz, N., & Belanger, M. (1987). Pedagogical considerations concerning the problem of representation. In C. Janvier, (Ed.)_
*Problems of representation in the teaching and**learning mathematical problem solving*(pp. 109–122). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Goldin, G. A. (2002). Representation in mathematical learning and problem solving, In L. D. English (Ed.),
*Handbook of international research in mathematics education*(pp. 197–218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Goldin, G. A. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: A unifying research perspective. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter, (Eds.),
*A research companion to principles and standards**for school mathematics*(pp. 275–285). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Janvier, C. (1987).
*Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematical problem solving.*Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Larkin, J. H. (1983). The role of problem representation in physics.In D. Genter & A. L. Stevens (Ed.),
*Mental models*(pp. 75–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Leinhardt, G. (1993). On teaching. In R. Glaser (Ed.),
*Advances in instructional psychology*(Vol. 4, pp. 1–54)., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Mathematical Science Education Board. (1998).
*The nature and role of algebra in the K-14 curriculum: Proceedings of a national symposium.*Washington DC : National Research Council.Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991).
*Professional standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: The Author..Google Scholar - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000).
*Principles and standards for school mathematics*. Reston, VA: The Author.Google Scholar - Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2004).
*Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003*. Paris: Author.Google Scholar - Pimm, D. (1995).
*Symbols and meanings in school mathematics*. London: Routledge.Google Scholar - Sekiguchi, Y. (1998). Mathematics education research as socially and culturally situated. In A. Serpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.),
*Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity*(pp. 391–396). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar - Silver, E. A., Leung, S. S., & Cai, J. (1995). Generating multiple solutions for a problem: A comparison of the responses of U.S. and Japanese students.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics,*28(1), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Smith, S. P. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: Children’s representations of problems. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Ed.),
*A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics*(pp. 263–274). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999).
*The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom*. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar