# Mathematical Literacy and Globalisation

## Abstract

If mathematics and power are interrelated in a globalised world, what does that mean for a mathematical literacy to be either functional or critical? The discussion of this question is organised in three steps:

First, different processes of globalisation are outlined. The thesis of indifference – that mathematics is a pure science without any socio-political or technological significance – is contrasted with the thesis of significance – that mathematics in action can operate in powerful ways, and power can be exercised though mathematics in action

Second, the processes of constructing, operating, consuming and marginalising are analysed. Here mathematics is operating, and mathematical literacy might be either functional or critical: (1) Processes of construction include advanced systems of knowledge and techniques, by means of which technology, in the broadest interpretation of the term, is maintained and further developed. (2) Processes of operation refer to work practices and job functions where mathematics may operate, although without surfacing in the situation. (3) Processes of consuming refer to situations in which one is addressed as a receiver of goods, information, services, obligations, etc. (4) Processes of marginalising turn out to be an aspect of globalisation, governed by a neo-liberal economy, which is far from being inclusive

Third, as conclusion, I get to the aporia, which questions the very distinction: functional-critical. On the one hand, I find this distinction important with respect to mathematical literacy. On the other hand, the distinction is vague, maybe illusive. Being both important and vague-illusive indicates the aporia we have to deal with, with respect to any critical mathematics education

### Keywords

Mathematical literacy globalisation ghettoising uncertainity## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

### References

- Alrø, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2002).
*Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: Intention, reflection, critique*. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Archibugi, D., & Lundvall, B. -Å. (Eds.) (2001).
*The globalizing learning economy*. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Apple, M. (1992). Do the standards go far enough? Power, policy and practice in mathematics Education.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*, 23, 412–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bauman, Z. (1998).
*Globalization: The human consequences*. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar - Bauman, Z. (2001).
*Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world*. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar - Beck, U. (1992).
*Risk society: Towards a new modernity*. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar - Beck, U. (1999):
*World risk society*. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar - Beck, U. (2000).
*What is globalization?*Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar - Bell, D. (1980). The social framework of the information society. In T. Forrester (Ed.),
*The microelectronics revolution*(pp. 500–549). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar - Castells, M. (1996).
*The information age: Economy, society and culture. volume I: The rise of the network society*. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar - Castells, M. (1997).
*The information age: Economy, society and culture. volume II, The power of identity*. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar - Castells, M. (1998).
*The information age: Economy, society and culture. volume III, End of millennium*. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar - FitzSimons, G. E. (2002).
*What counts as mathematics? Technologies of power in adult and vocational education*. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Foucault, M. (1977).
*Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison*. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. (First French edition 1975.)Google Scholar - Foucault, M. (1989).
*The archeology of knowledge*. London: Routledge. (First French edition 1969.)Google Scholar - Foucault, M. (1994).
*The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences.*New York: Vintage Books. (First French edition 1966.)Google Scholar - Frankenstein, M. (1989).
*Relearning mathematics: A different third R – Radical Maths*. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar - Frankenstein, M. (1998). Reading the world with maths: Goals for a critical mathematical literacy curriculum. In P. Gates (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the first international mathematics education and society conference*(pp. 180–189). Nottingham: Centre for the study of Mathematics Education, Nottingham University.Google Scholar - Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social Justice in an urban, latino school.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34*(1), 37–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004).
*Multitude*. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar - Hardy, G. H. (1967).
*A mathematician’s apology*. With a Foreword by C. P. Snow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1st edition 1940.)Google Scholar - Ihde, D. (1993).
*Philosophy of technology: An introduction*. New York: Paragon House Publishers.Google Scholar - Jablonka, E. (2003). Mathematical literacy. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.),
*Second international handbook of mathematics education*(pp. 75–102). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Mehrtens, H. (1993). The social system of mathematics and national socialism: A survey. In S. Restivo, J. P. van Bendegem & R. Fisher, R. (Eds.),
*Math worlds: Philosophical and social studies of mathematics and mathematics education*(pp. 219–246). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar - Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001).
*Re-Thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty*. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar - Powell, A. (2002): Ethnomathematics and the challenges of racism in mathematics education. In P. Valero & O. Skovsmose (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the third international mathematics education and society conference*(pp. 15–28). Copenhagen, Roskilde and Aalborg: Centre for Research in Learning Mathematics, Danish University of Education, Roskilde University and Aalborg University.Google Scholar - Skovsmose, O. (1994).
*Towards a philosophy of critical mathematical education*. Dordrect: Kluwer.Google Scholar - Skovsmose, O. (2005a). Foregrounds and politics of learning obstacles.
*For the Learning of Mathematics*, 25(1), 4–10.Google Scholar - Skovsmose, O. (2005b).
*Travelling through education: Uncertainty, mathematics, responsibility*. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar - Skovsmose, O., & Yasukawa, K. (2004). Formatting power of ‘mathematics in a package’: A challenge for social theorising?
*Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal.*(http://www.ex.ac.uk/∼ PErnest/pome18/contents.htm)Google Scholar - Teknologirådet (1995):
*Magt og modeller: Om den stigende anvendelse af edb-modeller i de politiske beslutninger*. Copenhagen: Teknologirådet.Google Scholar - Tomlinson, M. (2001). New roles for business services in economic growth. In D. Archibugi & B. -Å. Lundvall (Eds.),
*The globalizing learning economy*(pp. 97–107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar - Vithal, R., Christiansen, I. M., & Skovsmose, O. (1995). Project work in univeristy mathematics education: A danish experience: Aalborg university.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*, 29(2), 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wedege, T. (2002). Numeracy as a basic qualification in semi-skilled jobs.
*For the Learning of Mathematics*, 22(3), 23–28.Google Scholar