Monitoring Long-term Trends in Sulfate and Ammonium in US Precipitation: Results from the National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Network
Data from the National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Network (NADP/NTN) indicate significant changes have occurred in precipitation chemistry and the chemical climate in the United States (US). A Seasonal Kendall Trend (SKT) analysis shows statistically significant increases in precipitation ammonium concentrations at 64% of 159 continental US NADP/NTN sites evaluated from Winter 1985 to Fall 2004 (Dec. 1984 – Nov. 2004). Sulfate decreases were widespread, with an SKT analysis indicating statistically significant decreases at 89% of sites evaluated. Ratios of chemical equivalent concentrations of ammonium to sulfate in precipitation have risen to the extent that ammonium now exceeds sulfate over more than half of the continental U.S. on a precipitation-weightedmean annual basis. These trends in the concentrations of ammonium, sulfate, and other species have been accompanied by significant decreases in the frequency of acidic precipitation (pH<5.0) in the last decade.
Keywordschemical climate precipitation chemistry trend analysis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Gilbert, R. O. (1987). Statistical methods in environmental pollution monitoring. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 225-240.Google Scholar
- Helsel, D. R., & Hirsch, R. M. (1992). Statistical methods in water resources, U.S. (pp. 338-340). Reston, VA: Geological Survey.Google Scholar
- Millard, S. P., & Neerchal, N. K. (2000). Environmental statistics with S-Plus (pp. 680-685). Boca Raton: CRC.Google Scholar
- National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) (1995). Notification of important change in NADP/NTN procedures on 11 January 1994. Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL, U.S.A., http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/documentation/advisory.html, accessed 16 January 2006.
- National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) (2005). National trends network. Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, IL, U.S.A., http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/NTN, accessed 16 January 2006.
- Seinfeld, J. H., & Pandis, S. N. (1998). Atmospheric chemistry and physics: From air pollution to climate change (pp. 529-531, 1030-10330). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Sisterson, D. L., Bowersox, V. C., & Olsen, A. R. (1990). Wet deposition of atmospheric pollutants. National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program, Washington, D.C., U. S.A., 6-39 to 6-222 and 6-A1 to 6-A46.Google Scholar
- Stoddard, J. L., Kahl, J. S., Deviney, F. A., DeWalle, D. R., Driscoll, C. T., Herlihy, A. T., et al. (2003). Response of surface water chemistry to the clean air act amendments of 1990. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, U.S.A., pp. 78.Google Scholar
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (2005).1970-2002 Average annual emissions, all criteria pollutants. Washington, D.C., http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/trends/index.html, accessed January 16, 2006.