IDENTIFYING CHANGES IN SOIL QUALITY: CONTAMINATION AND ORGANIC MATTER DECLINE

  • PAT H. BELLAMY
  • R.J.A. JONES
Part of the NATO Security Through Science Series book series

Abstract

Soil is increasingly affected by applied agrochemicals, atmospheric pollutants, sewage sludge, and manures which can have adverse impacts on soil quality. The European Commission has embarked recently on a Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection that identifies eight threats to soil in Europe of which contamination and decline in organic matter are accorded high priority. To identify changes in soil quality it is important to have some baseline against which to measure that change. In the UK, a National Soil Inventory was made to provide an unbiased inventory of soil resources in Great Britain. Soil samples were taken on a national UTM grid and analysed for a range of physical and chemical properties. About 40% of the grid points in England and Wales were resampled providing an ideal data set from which to identify changes in soil properties, an essential requirement for ‘monitoring’. Geostatistics have been used to estimate the temporal change in several metal concentrations and in soil organic carbon (OC), the major constituent of soil organic matter. In almost all cases, a normally distributed random variable with outliers is shown to be a suitable statistical model to study the change in metal concentrations. A map of change in lead concentration, identifying ‘hotspots’, shows how these methodologies can be applied. It is also shown that the variation of the change in organic carbon is not spatially structured but that the rate of change depends on the initial OC level in the soil.

Keywords

Nickel Europe Sludge Sewage Manure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bellamy, P.H., Loveland, P.J., Bradley, R.I, Lark, R.M., and Kirk, G.J.D., 2005, Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales. Nature 437: 245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blum W.E.H., 1993, Soil Protection Concept of the Council of Europe and Integrated Soil Research. In Soil and Environment Vol. 1, H.J.P. Eijsackers and T. Hamers, eds., Integrated Soil and Sediment Research: A basis for Proper Protection. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 37–47.Google Scholar
  3. Brys, G., Hubert, M., and Struyf, A., 2004, A robust measure of skewness Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 13(4): 996–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. EC, 2002, Communication of 16 April 2002 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Towards a Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection [COM (2002) 179 final, 35 p.]. (At: http://europa.eu.int/scadplus/printversion/en//lvb/l28122.htm; last accessed: 27.10.2005).Google Scholar
  5. Lark, R.M., 2000, A comparison of some robust estimators of the variogram for use in soil survey. European Journal of Soil Science 51: 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lark, R.M., 2002, Modelling complex soil properties as contaminated regionalized variables. Geoderma. 106: 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lark, R.M., and Ferguson, R.B., 2004, Mapping the conditional probability of deficiency or excess of soil phosphorous, a comparison of ordinary indicator kriging and disjunctive kriging. Geoderma 118: 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones, R.J.A, Hiederer, R., Rusco, E., Loveland, P.J., and Montanarella, L., 2005, Estimating organic carbon in the soils of Europe for policy support. European Journal of Soil Science 56: 655–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McGrath, S.P., and Loveland, P.J., 1992, The Soil Geochemical Atlas of England and Wales. Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow. 101 p.Google Scholar
  10. Scholz, M., Oliver, M.A., Webster, R., Loveland, P.J., and McGrath, S.P., 1999, Sampling to monitor soil in England and Wales. In: Proceedings of 2nd European Conference on Geostatistics for Environmental Applications, Valencia, Spain, 18–20 November 1998, pp. 465–476.Google Scholar
  11. Rousseeuw, P.J., and Croux, C., 1992, Explicit scale estimators with high breakdown point. In: L1 Statistical Analysis and Related Methods (ed. Y. Dodge), pp. 77–92. North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Rousseeuw, P.J., and Croux, C., 1993, Alternatives to the median absolute deviation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88: 1273–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Utermann, J., Duwel, O., and Nagel, I., unpub, Trace Element and Organic Matter Contents of European Soils. Final Report (2003) to the Joint Research Centre, European Commission. 41 p.Google Scholar
  14. Webster, R., and Oliver, M.A., 1989, Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. VI. Disjunctive kriging and mapping the conditional probability. Journal of Soil Science 40: 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • PAT H. BELLAMY
    • 1
  • R.J.A. JONES
    • 1
  1. 1.National Soil Resources InstituteCranfield UniversitySilsoe

Personalised recommendations