Advertisement

Detection of disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow and blood of breast cancer patients

  • Volkmar Müller
  • Klaus Pantel
Part of the Cancer Metastasis – Biology and Treatment book series (CMBT, volume 11)

Abstract

Early tumor cell dissemination can be detected in patients with breast cancer using immunocytochemical and molecular assays based on the use of monoclonal antibodies or PCR. Studies involving more than 4,000 breast cancer patients have demonstrated now that the presence of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in bone marrow (BM) identified with immuncytochemical assays at primary diagnosis is a strong prognostic factor. The published studies for the detection of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow fulfill the highest level of evidence as prognostic markers in primary breast cancer. In addition, various assays for the detection of circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood have been recently developed and some studies suggest a potential clinical relevance of this parameter as prognostic and predictive factor. Advanced methods for molecular characterization of single tumor cells have been developed lately and this approach allows new insights into the metastatic cascade and characterization of targets for therapeutic approaches. These findings provide the basis for the implementation of DTC in BM or blood as markers for stratification and assessment of therapies in prospective clinical trials. The valuable information derived from these trials should help to improve future treatment of breast cancer patients.

Keywords

disseminated tumor cells bone marrow cytokeratin immunocytochemistry circulating tumor cells 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Singletary SE, Allred C, Ashley P, et al. Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3628-3636.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gebauer G, Fehm T, Merkle E, et al. Epithelial cells in bone marrow of breast cancer patients at time of primary surgery: clinical outcome during long-term follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:3669-3674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Landys K, Persson S, Kovarik J, Hultborn R, Holmberg E. Prognostic value of bone marrow biopsy in operable breast cancer patients at the time of initial diagnosis: Results of a 20-year median follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1998; 49:27-33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gerber B, Krause A, Muller H, et al. Simultaneous immunohistochemical detection of tumor cells in lymph nodes and bone marrow aspirates in breast cancer and its correlation with other prognostic factors. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:960-971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braun S, Vogl FD, Naume B, et al. International Pooled Analysis of Prognostic Significance of Bone Marrow Micrometastasis in Patients with Stage I, II, or III Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:793-802.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pantel K, Schlimok G, Angstwurm M, et al. Methodological analysis of immuno- cytochemical screening for disseminated epithelial tumor cells in bone marrow. J Hematother 1994; 3:165-173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braun S, Pantel K, Muller P, et al. Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow and survival of patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:525-533.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borgen E, Beiske K, Trachsel S, et al. Immunocytochemical detection of isolated epithelial cells in bone marrow: non-specific staining and contribution by plasma cells directly reactive to alkaline phosphatase. J Pathol 1998; 185:427-434.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Braun S, Pantel K. Micrometastatic bone marrow involvement: detection and prognostic significance. Med Oncol 1999; 16:154-165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borgen E, Naume B, Nesland JM, et al. Standardization of the immuno- cytochemical detection of cancer cells in BM and blood: I. establishment of objecive criteria for the evaluation of immunostained cells. Cytometry 1999; 1:377-388.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fehm T, Braun S, Müller V, et al. A concept for the standardized detection of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow of patients with primary breast cancer and its clinical implementation. In press 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Witzig TE, Bossy B, Kimlinger T, et al. Detection of circulating cytokeratin- positive cells in the blood of breast cancer patients using immunomagnetic enrichment and digital microscopy. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8:1085-1091.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kraeft SK, Ladanyi A, Galiger K, et al. Reliable and sensitive identification of occult tumor cells using the improved rare event imaging system. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10:3020-3028.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Borgen E, Naume B, Nesland JM, et al. Use of automated microscopy for the detection of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow samples. Cytometry 2001; 46:215-221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kraeft SK, Sutherland R, Gravelin L, et al. Detection and analysis of cancer cells in blood and bone marrow using a rare event imaging system. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6:434-442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bauer KD, de la Torre-Bueno J, Diel IJ, et al. Reliable and sensitive analysis of occult bone marrow metastases using automated cellular imaging. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6:3552-3559.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mehes G, Luegmayr A, Ambros IM, Ladenstein R, Ambros PF. Combined auto- matic immunological and molecular cytogenetic analysis allows exact identification and quantification of tumor cells in the bone marrow. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7:1969-1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosenberg R, Gertler R, Friederichs J, et al. Comparison of two density gradient centrifugation systems for the enrichment of disseminated tumor cells in blood. Cytometry 2002; 49:150-158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wiedswang G, Borgen E, Karesen R, et al. Detection of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21:3469-3478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Woelfle U, Breit E, Zafrakas K, et al. Bi-specific immunomagnetic enrichment of micrometastatic tumour cell clusters from bone marrow of cancer patients. J Immunol Methods 2005; 300:136-145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Symmans WF, Liu J, Knowles DM, Inghirami G. Breast cancer heterogeneity: evaluation of clonality in primary and metastatic lesions. Hum.Pathol. 1995; 26:210-216.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Braun S, Hepp F, Sommer HL, Pantel K. Tumor-antigen heterogeneity of disse- minated breast cancer cells: implications for immunotherapy of minimal residual disease. Int J Cancer 1999; 84:1-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Datta YH, Adams PT, Drobyski WR, et al. Sensitive detection of occult breast cancer by the reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12:475-482.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stathopoulou A, Ntoulia M, Perraki M, et al. A highly specific real-time RT- PCR method for the quantitative determination of CK-19 mRNA positive cells in peripheral blood of patients with operable breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2006.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xenidis N, Perraki M, Kafousi M, et al. Predictive and prognostic value of peripheral blood cytokeratin-19 mRNA-positive cells detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction in node-negative breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:3756-3762.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zippelius A, Kufer P, Honold G, et al. Limitations of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analyses for detection of micrometastatic epithelial cancer cells in bone marrow. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:2701-2708.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bostick PJ, Chatterjee S, Chi DD, et al. Limitations of specific reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction markers in the detection of metastases in the lymph nodes and blood of breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:2632-2640.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jung R, Kruger W, Hosch S, et al. Specificity of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays designed for the detection of circulating cancer cells is influenced by cytokines in vivo and in vitro. Br J Cancer 1998; 78:1194-1198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Klein CA, Blankenstein TJ, Schmidt-Kittler O, et al. Genetic heterogeneity of single disseminated tumour cells in minimal residual cancer. Lancet 2002; 360:683-689.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gangnus R, Langer S, Breit E, Pantel K, Speicher MR. Genomic profiling of viable and proliferative micrometastatic cells from early-stage breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10:3457-3464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brandt B, Roetger A, Heidl S, et al. Isolation of blood-borne epithelium-derived c-erbB-2 oncoprotein-positive clustered cells from the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 1998; 76:824-828.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B, et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:1659-1672.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:1673-1684.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wülfing P, Borchard J, Buerger H, et al. HER2-positive circulating tumor cells indicate poor clinical outcome in stage I to III breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12:1715-1720.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Braun S, Schlimok G, Heumos I, et al. ErbB2 overexpression on occult metastatic cells in bone marrow predicts poor clinical outcome of stage I-III breast cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2001; 61:1890-1895.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pantel K, Schlimok G, Braun S, et al. Differential expression of proliferation- associated molecules in individual micrometastatic carcinoma cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85:1419-1424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Müller V, Stahmann N, Riethdorf S, et al. Circulating Tumor Cells in Breast Cancer: Correlation to Bone Marrow Micrometastases, Heterogeneous Response to Systemic Therapy and Low Proliferative Activity. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 3678-85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Woelfle U, Cloos J, Sauter G, et al. Molecular signature associated with bone marrow micrometastasis in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 2003; 63:5679-5684.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bernards R, Weinberg RA. A progression puzzle. Nature 2002; 418:823.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Calaluce R, Miedema BW, Yesus YW. Micrometastasis in colorectal carcinoma: a review. J Surg Oncol 1998; 67:194-202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Molino A, Pelosi G, Turazza M, et al. Bone marrow micrometastases in 109 breast cancer patients: correlations with clinical and pathological features and prognosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1997; 42:23-30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Funke I, Schraut W. Meta-analyses of studies on bone marrow micrometastases: an independent prognostic impact remains to be substantiated. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:557-566.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lugo TG, Braun S, Cote RJ, Pantel K, Rusch V. Detection and measurement of occult disease for the prognosis of solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21:2609-2615.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Braun S, Hepp F, Kentenich CR, et al. Monoclonal antibody therapy with edrecolomab in breast cancer patients: monitoring of elimination of disseminated cytokeratin-positive tumor cells in bone marrow. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5:3999-4004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wiedswang G, Borgen E, Karesen R, et al. Isolated tumor cells in bone marrow three years after diagnosis in disease-free breast cancer patients predict unfavorable clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10:5342-5348.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Diel IJ, Kaufmann M, Costa SD, et al. Micrometastatic breast cancer cells in bone marrow at primary surgery: prognostic value in comparison with nodal status. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88:1652-1658.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mansi JL, Gogas H, Bliss JM, et al. Outcome of primary-breast-cancer patients with micrometastases: a long-term follow-up study. Lancet 1999; 354:197-202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cote RJ, Rosen PP, Lesser ML, Old LJ, Osborne MP. Prediction of early relapse in patients with operable breast cancer by detection of occult bone marrow micrometastases. J Clin Oncol 1991; 9:1749-1756.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Harbeck N, Untch M, Pache L, Eiermann W. Tumour cell detection in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients at primary therapy: results of a 3-year median follow-up. Br J Cancer 1994; 69:566-571.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pierga JY, Bonneton C, Vincent-Salomon A, et al. Clinical significance of immunocytochemical detection of tumor cells using digital microscopy in peripheral blood and bone marrow of breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10:1392-1400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wiedswang G, Borgen E, Schirmer C, et al. Comparison of the clinical signi- ficance of occult tumor cells in blood and bone marrow in breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2006; 118:2013-2019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, et al. Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:781-791.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Cristofanilli M, Hayes DF, Budd GT, et al. Circulating tumor cells: a novel prognostic factor for newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:1420-1430.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Meng S, Tripathy D, Shete S, et al. HER-2 gene amplification can be acquired as breast cancer progresses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:9393-9398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Volkmar Müller
    • 1
  • Klaus Pantel
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GynecologyUniversity Medical Centre Groningen Center Hamburg-EppendorfGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Tumor BiologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfGermany

Personalised recommendations