Abstract
This essay discusses Stanley Cavell’s remarkable interpretation of Emmanuel Levinas’s thought against the background of his own ongoing engagement with Wittgenstein, Austin, and the problem of other minds. This unlikely debate, the only extensive discussion of Levinas by Cavell in his long philosophical career sofar, focuses on their different reception of Descartes’s idea of the infinite. The essay proposes to read both thinkers against the background of Wittgenstein’s model of philosophical meditation and raises the question as to whether Cavell and Levinas do not indirectly shed light on the early modern motif of the spiritual automaton.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cavell, S. (1979). The claim of reason: wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cavell, S. (1989). This new yet unapproachable America: Essays after emerson after Wittgenstein. Albuquerque: Living Batch Press.
Cavell, S. (1991). Conditions handsome and unhandsome: The constitution of emersonian perfectionism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cavell, S. (1994). A pitch of philosophy: Autobiographical exercises. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cavell, S. (2002). The availability of wittgenstein’s later philosophy. In: Must we mean what we say? A book of essays (updated edn., pp. 44–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cavell, S. (2001). La passion. In: J. Benoist et al. (Eds.), Quelle philosophie pour le xxie siècle?: L’organon du nouveau siècle (pp. 333–386). Paris: Gallimard and Centre Pompidou.
Cavell, S. (2004). Cities of light: Pedagogical letters on a register of the moral life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cavell, S. (2005). What is the scandal of skepticism? Philosophy the day after tomorrow (pp. 132–154). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Deleuze, G. (1968). Spinoza et le problème de l’expression. Paris: Minuit. [Deleuze, G. (1992). Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza. New York: Zone Books (Translated by M. Joughin)].
Derrida, J. (1987). Comment ne pas parler: Dénégations. In: Psyché: Inventions de l’autre (pp. 535–596). Paris: Galilée.
Derrida, J. (1989). How to avoid speaking: Denials. In S. Budick & W. Iser (Eds.), Languages of the unsayable: the play of negativity in literature and literary theory (pp. 3–70). New York: Columbia University Press. (Translated by K. Frieden).
Descartes, R. (1996). In: J. Cottingham (Ed.), Meditations on first philosophy: with selections from the objections and replies (revised edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hadot, P. (2004). Wittgenstein et les limites du langage. Paris: Vrin.
Hammer, E. (2002). Stanley Cavell: Skepticism, subjectivity, and the ordinary. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Levinas, E. (1961). Totalité et infini: Essai sur l’extériorité. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff [Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press]. Translated by A. Lingis.
Levinas, E. (1974). Autrement qu’être, ou au-delà de l’essence. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff [Levinas, E. (1981). Otherwise than being, or beyond essence. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff] (Translated by A. Lingis).
Levinas, E. (1986). Dieu et philosophie. In: De Dieu qui vient à l’idée (pp. 93–127). Paris: Vrin.
Levinas, E. (1998). God and philosophy. In: Of God who comes tomind (pp. 55–78). Stanford: Stanford University Press (Translated by B. Bergo).
Nagel, T. (1989). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
Vries, H. de (1991). Zum Begriff der Allegorie in Schopenhauers Religionsphilosophie In: W. Schirmacher (Ed.), Schopenhauer, Nietzsche und die Kunst, Schopenhauer-Studien (pp. 187–197). Vienna.
Vries, H. de (1998). Introduction. In: Dit nieuwe maar onbereikbare America: Emerson na Wittgenstein (pp. 7–27). Parrèsia: Amsterdam (Translated by F. van Zetten).
Vries, H. de (2005). Minimal theologies: Critiques of secular reason in Theodor W. Adorno and Emmanuel Levinas. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Vries, H. (2006). From “ghost in the machine” to “spiritual automaton”: Philosophical meditation in Wittgenstein, Cavell, and Levinas. In: Long, E.T. (eds) Self and Other: Essays in Continental Philosophy of Religion. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5861-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5861-5_6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5860-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5861-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)