Abstract
Phylogenetic, paleodietary, and developmental studies of hominoid primates frequently make use of the post-canine dentition, in particular molar teeth. To study the thickness and shape of molar enamel and dentine, internal dental structures must be revealed (e.g., the location of dentine horn apices), typically necessitating the production of physical sections through teeth. The partially destructive nature of such studies limits sample sizes and access to valuable fossil specimens, which has led scholars to apply several methods of radiographic visualization to the study of teeth. Radiographic methods aimed at visualizing internal dental structures include lateral flat-plane X-rays, ultrasound, terra-hertz imaging, and computed tomography. Each of these techniques has resolution limitations rendering them inadequate for accurately reconstructing both the enamel-dentine junction and the outer enamel surface; the majority of studies are thus performed using physical sections of teeth. A comparatively new imaging technique, micro-computed tomography (mCT), accurately portrays the enamel-dentine junction of primate molars, and provides accurate measurements of enamel cap thickness and morphology. The research presented here describes methodological parameters pertinent to mCT studies of molars (slice thickness and pixel resolution), and the observable impact on measurement accuracy when these parameters are altered. Measurements taken on a small, taxonomically diverse sample of primate molars indicate that slice thickness should be conservatively set at approximately 3.45 % of specimen length, and image resolution should be maximized (ideally, greater than or equal to 2048 × 2048 pixels per image) in order to ensure measurement accuracy. After discussing this base-line protocol for future mCT studies of the primate dentition, illustrative applications of this imaging technology are presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andrews, P.,1992. Evolution and environment in the Hominoidea. Nature 360, 641–646.
Andrews P., Martin L.,1991. Hominoid dietary evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. Biological Sciences 334, 199–209.
Brunet, M., Guy, F., Pilbeam, D., Mackaye, H.T., Likius, A., Ahounta, D., Beauvilain, A., Blondel, C., Bocherens, H., Boisserie, J.R., De Bonis, L., Coppens, Y., Dejax, J., Denys, C., Duringer, P., Eisenmann, V.R., Fanone, G., Fronty, P., Geraads, D., Lehmann, T., Lihoreau, F., Louchart, A., Mahamat, A., Merceron, G., Mouchelin, G., Otero, O., Campomanes, P.P., De Leon, M.P., Rage, J.C., Sapanet, M., Schuster, M., Sudre, J., Tassy, P., Valentin, X., Vignaud, P., Viriot, L., Zazzo, A., Zollikofer, C.,2002. A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, central Africa. Nature 418, 145–151.
Chaimanee, Y., Jolly D., Benammi, M., Tafforeau, P., Duzer, D., Moussa, I., Jaeger, J.J.,2003. A Middle Miocene hominoid from Thailand and orangutan origins. Nature 422, 61–65.
Corruccini, R.S.,1987. The Dentinoenamel Junction in Primates. International Journal of Primatology 8, 99–114.
Crawley, D., Longbottom, C., Wallace, V.P., Cole, B., Arnone, D., Pepper, M.,2003. Three-dimensional terahertz pulse imaging of dental tissue. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 8, 303–307.
Daegling, D.J., Hylander, W.L.,1997. Occlusal forces and mandibular bone strain: Is the primate jaw ‘‘overdesigned’’? Journal of Human Evolution 33, 705–717.
Gantt, D.G.,1977. Enamel of primate teeth: its thickness and structure with reference to functional and phyletic implications. Ph.d. Dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
Grine, F.E.,1991. Computed tomography and the measurement of enamel thickness in extant hominoids: implications for its paleontological application. Palaeontologia Africana 28, 61–69.
Grine F.E.,2004. Geographic variation in tooth enamel thickness does not support Neandertal involvement in the ancestry of modern Europeans. South African Journal of Science 100, 389–394.
Grine, F.E., Martin, L.,1988. Enamel thickness and development in Australopithecus and Paranthropus. In: Grine, F.E. (Ed.), Evolutionary History of the “Robust” Australopithecines. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
Grine, F.E., Stevens, N.J., Jungers, W.L.,2001. An evaluation of dental radiograph accuracy in the measurement of enamel thickness. Archives of Oral Biology 46, 1117–1125.
Kono, R.,2004. Molar enamel thickness and distribution patterns in extant great apes and humans: new insights based on a 3-dimensional whole crown perspective. Anthropological Science 112, 121–146.
Korenhof, C.A.W.,1960. Morphogenetical Aspects of the Human Upper Molar. Uitgeversmaatschappij Neerlandia, Utrecht.
Korenhof, C.A.W.,1961. The enamel-dentine border: a new morphological factor in the study of the (human) molar pattern. Proceedings of Koninklijke Nederlands 64B, 639–664.
Korenhof, C.A.W.,1978. Remnants of the trigonid crests in Medieval molars of Man in Java. In:Butler, P.M., Joysey, K.A. (Eds.), Development, Function, and Evolution of Teeth. Academic Press, New York, pp. 157–170.
Korenhof, C.A.W.,1982. Evolutionary trends of the inner enamel anatomy of deciduous molars from Sangiran (Java, Indonesia). In: Kurten, B. (Ed.), Teeth: Form, Function, and Evolution. Columbia University Press New York, pp. 350–365.
Martin, L.B.,1983. Relationships of the later Miocene Hominoidea. Ph.D. Dissertation, University College London, England.
Martin, L.B.,1985. Significance of enamel thickness in hominoid evolution. Nature 314, 260–263.
Martin, L.B., Olejniczak, A.J., Maas, M.C.,2003. Enamel thickness and microstructure in pitheciin primates, with comments on dietary adaptations of the middle Miocene hominoid Kenyapithecus. Journal of Human Evolution 45, 351–367.
Miller, G.S.,1915. The jaw of Piltdown Man. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 65, 1–31.
Olejniczak, A.J.,2005. Mesiodistal and angular obliquity in studies of dental sections. American Journal of Physical Anthropology supplement, 126, 160.
Olejniczak, A.J., Grine, F.E.,2006. Assessment of the accuracy of dental enamel thickness using high-resolution micro-focal X-ray computed tomography. Anatomical Record Part A 288A, 263–275.
Olejniczak, A.J., Grine, F.E.,2005. High-resolution measurement of Neandertal tooth enamel thickness by micro-focal computed tomography (mCT). South African Journal of Science 101, 219–220.
Olejniczak, A.J., Martin, L.B., Ulhaas, L.,2004. Quantification of dentine shape in anthropoid primates. Annals of Anatomy 186, 479–485.
Schwartz, G.T.,2000. Taxonomic and functional aspects of the patterning of enamel thickness distribution in extant large-bodied hominoids. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 111, 221–244.
Senut, B., Pickford, M., Gommery, D., Mein, P., Cheboi, K., Coppens, Y.,2001. First hominid from the Miocene (Lukeino Formation, Kenya). Comptes Rendus de L’Academie Des Sciences Serie II Fascicule A- Sciences De La Terre Et Des Planetes 332, 137–144.
Shellis, R.P., Beynon, A.D., Reid, D.J., Hiiemae, K.M.,1998. Variations in molar enamel thickness among primates. Journal of Human Evolution 35, 507–522.
Shimizu, D.,2002. Functional implications of enamel thickness in the lower molars of red colobus (Procolobus badius) and Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata). Journal of Human Evolution 43, 605–620.
Simons, E.L.,1976. The nature of the transition in the dental mechanism from pongids to hominids. Journal of Human Evolution 5, 511–528.
Skinner, M.M., Kapadia, R.,2005. An evaluation of microCT for assessing in 3-D the concordance of dental trait expression between the dentin-enamel junction and the outer enamel surface of modern human molars. American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement, 126, 191–192.
Smith, T.M., Olejniczak, A.J., Martin, L.B., Reid, D.J.,2005. Variation in hominoid molar enamel thickness. Journal of Human Evolution 48, 575–592.
Spoor, C.F., Zonneveld, F.W., Macho, G.A.,1993. Linear measurements of cortical bone and dental enamel by computed-tomography – applications and problems. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 91, 469–484.
Suwa, G., Kono, R.,2005. A micro-CT based study of linear enamel thickness in the mesial cusp section of human molars: reevaluation of methodology and assessment of within-tooth, serial, and individual variation. Anthropological Science 113, 273–289.
Ulhaas, L., Henke, W., Rothe, H.,1999. Variation in molar enamel thickness in genera Cercopithecus and Colobus. Anthropologie 37, 265–271.
White, T.D., Suwa, G., Asfaw, B.,1994. Australopithecus ramidus, a new species of early hominid from Aramis, Ethiopia. Nature 371,306–312.
Yang, Z.,1991. Ultrasound surface imaging and the measurement of tooth enamel thickness. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Manchester, UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Olejniczak, A., Grine, F., Martin, L. (2007). Micro-computed tomography of primate molars: Methodological aspects of three-dimensional data collection. In: Bailey, S.E., Hublin, JJ. (eds) Dental Perspectives on Human Evolution: State of the Art Research in Dental Paleoanthropology. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5845-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5845-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5844-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5845-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)