Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Limitations And Accomplishments Of Autonomy As A Basic Principle In Bioethics And Biolaw

  • Chapter
Autonomy and Human Rights in Health Care

Part of the book series: International Library Of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 36))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ambroselli, C. (1988) L’Éthique médicale. Paris, PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, M.B. (1997) The necessary articulation between autonomy and vulnerability. Working Papers, Research Projects, VII. Centre for Ethics and Law, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L. and Childress, J. (1979) Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. (1994) Situating the Self. London, Routlegde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D (2000) “The Vulnerability of the Human Condition”, in Peter Kemp, Jacob Rendtorff & Niels Mattsson Johansen (eds.) Bioethics and Biolaw. Vol II. Four Ethical Principles, Copenhagen, Rhodos International Publishers, pp. 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, M. (1993) Bioethics in a Liberal Society. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfosse, M.L. (1993) L’Expérimentation médicale sur l’être humain, construire l’éthique, construire les normes. Bruxelles, De Boeck Université

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, G. (1988) Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. London, Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, H.T., Jr. (1987) The Foundations of Bioethics. New York, Oxford, Second Revised Edition, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faden and Beauchamp, T.L. (1986) A History and Theory of Informed Consent. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folshed, D. (1997) Philosophie, éthique et droit de la medicine. Paris , PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. (1985) Protecting the Vulnerable : A Reanalysis of Our Social Responsibilities. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häberle P. (1997) Europäisches Rechtskultur. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1992) Faktizität and Geltung. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, M. (1992) Human Dignity and Animal Wellbeing. Uppsala, Almquist & Wiksell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (1984) The Value of Life. London, Routlegde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. (1998) “Rights” In Jaggar, A., Young, I. (eds.) A Companion to Feminist Philosophy, Oxford, Blackwell, pp 500–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, K. (1919) Psychologie der Weltanschauungen, München, Piber Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, P. (2000) “Four Ethical Principles in Biolaw”, in Peter Kemp, Jacob Rendtorff & Niels Mattsson Johansen (eds.) Bioethics and Biolaw. Vol II. Four Ethical Principles, Copenhagen, Rhodos International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1961) Totalité et infini. La Haye, Nijhof.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerheim, H. (1994) Vitenskap och kommunikasjon. Oslo, Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1992) Political Liberalism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, W. (ed.) (1978) Encyclopedia of Bioethics. Washington, DC., New York, Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1990) Soi-même un Autre. Paris, Èditions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (2000) “Prudential Judgment, Deontological Judgment and Reflexive Judgment in Medical Ethics”, in Peter Kemp, Jacob Rendtorff & Niels Mattsson Johansen (eds.) (2000) Bioethics and Biolaw. Vol I. Judgment of Life, Copenhagen, Rhodos International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendtorff, J.D. and Kemp, P. (2000) Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw, Vol I. Autonomy, Dignity, Integrity and Vulnerability, Report to the European Commission of the Bio-Med-II Project Basic Ethical Principles in Bioethics and Biolaw 1995–1998. Centre for Ethics and Law, Copenhagen, Denmark & Institut borja de bioètica, Barcelona, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.P. (1943) L’Etre et le Néant. Paris, Éditions Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sève, L. (1994) Critique de la raison bioéthique. Paris, Éditions Odile Jacob .

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrabanek, P. (1985) La fin de la médecine à visage humain. Paris. Éditions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jacob D. Rendtorff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rendtorff, J.D. (2008). The Limitations And Accomplishments Of Autonomy As A Basic Principle In Bioethics And Biolaw. In: Autonomy and Human Rights in Health Care. International Library Of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5841-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation