Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human Rights, Health Care And Biomedical Innovation: Confronting The Research Imperative

  • Chapter
Autonomy and Human Rights in Health Care

Part of the book series: International Library Of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 36))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Appelbaum, P.S., Roth L.H. and Lidz C.W. 1982. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 5(3–4): 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashcroft, R. 1999. Equipoise, knowledge and ethics in clinical research and practice, Bioethics 13(3–4): 314–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L. 1996. Looking back and judging our predecessors, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6(3): 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beecher, H.K. 1966. Ethics and clinical research, New England Journal of Medicine 274(24): 1354–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, T.G. and Erlen J. 1999. The scientific environment of the Tuskegee Study of Syphilis, 1920–1960, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 43(1): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumgart, H.L. 1969. The medical framework for viewing the problem of human experimentation. In: Experimentation With Human Subjects,ed. Freund, P.A., pp 39–65. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, T. 1987. The Paperclip Conspiracy: The Battle for the Spoils and Secrets of Nazi Germany. M. Joseph: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brackman, A.C. 1988. The Other Nuremberg: The Untold Story of the Tokyo War Crimes Trials. Quill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynum, W. 1988. Reflections on the history of human experimentation. In: The Use of Human Beings in Research: With Special Reference to Clinical Trials, ed. Spicker, S.F., pp 29–46. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. 2003. What Price Better Health? Hazards of the Research Imperative. University of California Press: Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A.L. 1988. Is there an obligation to participate in biomedical research? In: The Use of Human Beings in Research: With Special Reference to Clinical Trials, ed. Spicker, S.F., pp 229–48. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A.L. 1992. Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. When evil intrudes, Hastings Center Report 22(6): 29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIOMS. 2002.International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for Macroeconomics and Health. 2001. Macroeconomics and Health: Investing in Health for Economic Development. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, C. 2001. The Ethics of Medical Research on Humans.Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, B. 1987. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research, New England Journal of Medicine 317(3): 141–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funding First. 2002. Exceptional Returns: The Economic Value of America's Investment in Medical Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatter, R. 2003. Walking the talk of trust in human subjects research: The challenge of regulating financial conflicts of interest, Emory Law Journal 52: 327–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, F. 2001. Uncertainty about clinical equipoise. Clinical equipoise and the uncertainty principles both require further scrutiny, British Medical Journal 322(7289): 795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, M.J. et al. 2000. Medical Research and Incompetent Adults, Journal of Mental Health Law 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Health Committee (UK). 2005. The Influence of the Pharmaceutical Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illingworth, P.M.L. 2005. Trusting Medicine: The Moral Cost of Managed Care. Routledge: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. 2001. Preserving trust: Accreditation and human research participation protection programs. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. 2004. Ethical Conduct of Clinical Research Involving Children. National Academy Press: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. 1969. Philosophical reflections on experimenting with human subjects, Daedalus 98(2): 219–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J. 1999. Equipoise and the problem of research subjects with diminished capacity, Accountability in Research 7(2–4): 277–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlawish, J.H. and Lantos J. 1997. Community equipoise and the architecture of clinical research, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6(4): 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kass, N.E. et al. 1996. Trust, The fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research, Hastings Center Report 26(5): 25-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. 1969. The education of the physician-investigator, Daedalus 98(2): 480–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. 1993. Human experimentation and human rights, St.Louis University Law Journal 38(1): 7–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J., Capron A.M. and Glass E.S. 1972. Experimentation with Human Beings: The Authority of the Investigator, Subject, Professions, and State in the Human Experimentation Process. Russell Sage Foundation: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, S.E. 1995. Subjected to Science: Human Experimentation in America before the Second World War. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. 2002. Procedures that are Against the Medical Interests of Incompetent Adults, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22(4): 575–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, R. and Sherwin S. 1975. Experimenting on human subjects: Philosophical perspectives, Case Western Reserve Law Review 25(3): 434–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, H.M. 1997. The Progress of Experiment: Science and Therapeutic Reform in the United States, 1900–1990. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge England.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R.A. 1974. Proxy consent in the experimentation situation, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 18(1): 2–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R.A. 1976. Experimentation in children: sharing in sociality, Hastings Center Report 6(6): 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NHMRC. 1999. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans.National Health and Medical Research Council: Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, P. 1970. The Patient as Person.Yale University Press: New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, P. 1976. The enforcement of morals: nontherapeutic research on children,Hastings Center Report 6(4): 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, P. 1977. Children as research subjects: a reply, Hastings Center Report 7(2): 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, L.E. 2002. Exceptional economic returns on investments in medical research, Medical Journal of Australia 177(7): 368–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D.J. 1991. Strangers at the Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision Making. BasicBooks: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomasma, D.C. 1996. A communal model for presumed consent for research on the neurologically vulnerable, Accountability in Research 4(3–4): 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomasma, D.C. 2000. A model of community substituted consent for research on the vulnerable, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3(1): 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomasma, D.C. 2001. Community Consent for Research on the Impaired Elderly. In: Aging: Decisions at the End of Life,eds. Weisstub, D.N. Thomasma D.C., Gauthier S., and Tomossy G.F., pp 207–26. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomossy, G.F. 2006. Vulnerability in research. In: Disputes and Dilemmas in Health Law,eds. Freckelton, I. and Petersen K., pp 534–59. Sydney: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomossy, G.F. and Weisstub D.N. 1997. The reform of adult guardianship laws: the case of non-therapeutic experimentation, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 20(1): 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tri-Council. 1998. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Ottawa, Ministry of Supply and Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdun-Jones, S.N. and Weisstub D.N. 1998. Drawing the Distinction Between Therapeutic Research and Non-Therapeutic Experimentation: Clearing a Way Through the Definitional Thicket. In: Research on Human Subjects: Ethics, Law, and Social Policy,ed. Weisstub, D.N., pp 111–36. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisstub, D.N. 1998. The ethical parameters of experimentation. In: Research on Human Subjects: Ethics, Law, and Social Policy,ed. Weisstub, D.N., pp 1–34. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisstub, D.N., Arboleda-Florez J., and Tomossy G.F. 1998. Establishing the boundaries of ethically permissible research with vulnerable populations. In: Research on Human Subjects: Ethics, Law, and Social Policy,ed. Weisstub, D.N., pp 355–79. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisstub, D.N., Thomasma D.C., Gauthier S., and Tomossy G.F. (eds), 2001a. Aging: Caring for Our Elders.Kluwer: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisstub, D.N., Thomasma D.C., Gauthier S., and Tomossy G.F. (eds), 2001b. Aging: Culture, Health and Social Change. Kluwer: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisstub, D.N., Thomasma D.C., Gauthier S., and Tomossy G.F. (eds), 2001c. Aging: Decisions at the End of Life. Kluwer: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P., Wallace D., 1989. Unit 731: Japan’s Secret Biological Warfare in World War II. Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarborough, M. and Sharp R.R. 2002. Restoring and preserving trust in biomedical research, Academic Medicine 77(1): 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. George F. Tomossy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tomossy, G.F. (2008). Human Rights, Health Care And Biomedical Innovation: Confronting The Research Imperative. In: Autonomy and Human Rights in Health Care. International Library Of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5841-7_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation