Skip to main content

Omissions in Managing Knowledge in Innovation Processes or How to Handle Knowledge, Humans and Tasks: A Semio-Cognitive Approach

  • Chapter
Project Management and Risk Management in Complex Projects

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alavi M, Leidner DE (2001) Review: knowledge management and knowledge man-agement systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25, pp. 107-125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M (2001) Odd couple: making sense of the curious concept of knowl-edge management. The Journal of Management Studies, 38, p. 995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 82, pp. 150-169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barras R (1990) Interactive innovation in financial and business services: the vanguard of the service revolution. Research Policy, 19, pp. 215-237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beesley L (2004) Multi-level complexity in the management of knowledge networks. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8, pp. 71-88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw J, Nobel R, Ridderstrale J (2002) Knowledge as a contingency vari-able: do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure. Organization Science, 13, pp. 274-289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden MA (1994) Précis of the creative mind: myths and mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, pp. 519-570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisot MH (1995) Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organiza-tions, Institutions and Culture, Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisot MH (1998) Knowledge Assets: Securing Competitive Advantage in the Information Economy, Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown L, Eisenhardt KM (1995) Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions. The Academy of Management Review, 20, p. 343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buijs J (1987) Innovatie en Interventie, 2 edn, Kluwer, Deventer, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13, pp. 442-455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Paul RJ (2001) Visualizing a knowledge domain’s intellectual structure. Computer, 34, p. 65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa V, Coughlan P, Voss CA (1996) Development of a technical innovation audit. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, pp. 105-136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cijsouw R, Jorna R (2003) Measuring and mapping knowledge types. In: Gazendam HWM, Cijsouw R, Jorna R (eds.), Dynamics and Change in Organizations: Studies in Organizational Semiotics 3, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 215-243

    Google Scholar 

  • Cijsouw R (2006) Knowledge in Medical Device Development Projects, PhD dis-sertation series of the SOM research school

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RG (1994) Third-generation new product processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, pp. 3-14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (1999) Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In: Sternberg RJ (ed.), The Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 313-335

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvir D, Raz T, Shenhar A.J (2003) An empirical analysis of the relationship be-tween project planning and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 21, pp. 89-95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst D, Kim L (2002) Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation. Research Policy, 31, pp. 1417-1429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evaristo JR, Scudder R, Desouza KC, Sato O (2004) A dimensional analysis of geographically distributed project teams: a case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, pp. 175-189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayol H (1987) General and Industrial Management, rev. edn, Pitman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Frame JD (1995) Managing Projects in Organizations. How to Make the Best Use of Time, Techniques and People, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen LF, Hemlin S, Husted K (2004) The role of knowledge management in R&D: a survey of Danish R&D leaders’ perceptions and beliefs. Interna-tional Journal of Technology Management, 28, pp. 820-839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia R, Calantone R (2002) A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Inno-vation Management, 19, pp. 110-132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb B, Henrekson M (2003) Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32, pp. 639-658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall R, Andriani P (2003) Managing knowledge associated with innovation. Journal of Business Research, 56, pp. 145-152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haner UE (2002) Innovation quality - a conceptual framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 80, pp. 31-37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellstrom T (2000) Knowledge and competence management at Ericsson: decen-tralization and organizational fit. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4, p. 99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herroelen W, Leus R (2001) On the merits and pitfalls of critical chain schedul-ing. Journal of Operations Management, 19, pp. 559-577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoopes DG, Postrel S (1999) Shared knowledge, “glitches”, and product devel-opment performance. Strategic Management Journal, 20, pp. 837-865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorna RJ (1998) Knowledge management really is about representations. The Semiotic Review of Books, 9.2, pp. 5-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazanjian RK, Drazin R, Glynn MA (2000) Creativity and technological learning: the roles of organization architecture and crisis in large-scale projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17, pp. 273-298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan V, Ulrich KT (2001) Product development decisions: a review of the literature. Management Science, 47, pp. 1-21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak A, Wang J (1993) Decomposition in concurrent engineering. In: Kusiak A (ed.), Concurrent Engineering: Automation, Tools, and Techniques, Wiley, New York, pp. 481-507

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry R, Amara N, Lamari M (2001) Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy, 30, pp. 333-349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Krahmer F, Schmoch U (1998) Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27, pp. 835-851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organi-zation Science, 6, pp. 14-37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Toyama R (2003) The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 1, pp. 2-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Toyama R, Noboru K (2000) SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model for dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33, pp. 5-34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce JL, Delbecq AL (1977) Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 2, pp. 27-37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano GP (1996) Learning-before-doing in the development of new process technology. Research Policy, 25, pp. 1097-1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1967) The Tacit Dimension, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn ZW (1984) Computation and Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappert B, Webster A, Charles D (1999) Making sense of diversity and reluctance: academic-industrial relations and intellectual property. Research Policy, 28, pp. 873-890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of Innovation, The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth J (2003) Enabling knowledge creation: learning from an R&D organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7, pp. 32-48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein-Montano B, Liebowitz J, Buchwalter J, McCaw D, Newman B, Rebeck K (2001) A systems thinking framework for knowledge management. Decision Support Systems, 31, pp. 5-16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber G, Akkermans H, Anjewierden A, de Hoog R, Shadbolt N, Van de Velde, W et al. (2002) Knowledge Engineering and Management: The CommonKADS Methodology, 3 edn, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon E, Weaver W (1963) The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Slappendel C (1996) Perspectives on innovation in organizations. Organization Studies, 17, pp. 107-129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soroush HM (1994) The most critical path in a PERT network. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45, pp. 287-300

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Steyn H (2002) Project management applications of the theory of constraints beyond critical chain scheduling. International Journal of Project Management, 20, pp. 75-80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan J (2003) Knowledge management in action. In Holsapple CW (ed.), Handbook of Knowledge Management, Springer, Berlin, pp. 271-296

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G (2000) The process of knowledge transfer. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, pp. 9-27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G, Amin K (2001) Learning to make strategy: balancing discipline and imagination. Long Range Planning, 34, pp. 537-556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P, Lowe J (1997) Are functional assets or knowledge assets the basis of new product development performance? Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 9, pp. 473-488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (2000) Strategies for managing knowledge assets: the role of firm structure and industrial context. Long Range Planning, 33, pp. 35-54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tezuda S, Niwa K (2004) Knowledge sharing in inter-organisational intelligence: R&D-based venture alliance community cases in Japan. International Journal of Technology Management, 28, pp. 714-728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen RJW (2001) Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30, pp. 35-54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner WSI (1987) SDM: system development methodology, PANDATA, Rijswijk, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven AH (1999) The Innovation Journey, Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Krogh G, Roos J (1994) A perspective on knowledge, competence and strategy. Personnel Review, 26, p. 31

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Krogh, G, Ichijo K, Nonaka I (2000) Enabling Knowledge Creation, Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • West MA, Farr JL (1990) Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies, Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • White D, Fortune J (2002) Current practice in project management - an empirical study. International Journal of Project Management, 20, pp. 1-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman G, Duncan R, Holbek J (1973) Innovations and Organizations, Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner C (2003) The economic effects of basic research: evidence for embodied knowledge transfer via scientists’ migration. Research Policy, 32, pp. 1881-1895

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cijsouw, R.S., Jorna, R.J., Rakhorst, G., Verkerke, G.J. (2007). Omissions in Managing Knowledge in Innovation Processes or How to Handle Knowledge, Humans and Tasks: A Semio-Cognitive Approach. In: Charrel, PJ., Galarreta, D. (eds) Project Management and Risk Management in Complex Projects. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5837-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5837-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5836-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5837-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics