Automated Repair Tool for Usability and Accessibility of Web Sites

  • Arnaud JasseletteEmail author
  • Marc Keita
  • Monique Noirhomme-Fraiture
  • Frédéric Randolet
  • Jean Vanderdonckt
  • Christian Van Brussel
  • Donatien Grolaux


The need for checking both usability and accessibility of Web sites is widely recognized, approved and recommended by several official organizations. What should really be more recognized or addressed is an equal need for repairing the usability and accessibility defects that have been detected. Within the Destine suite, we developed a tool allowing to repair the HTML source code of a page with user interaction. Thanks to an improved version of the Guideline Definition Language (GDL), the accessibility guidelines are not hard-coded, so that our tool can deal with any existing or future standards


Accessibility Automated repair tool Destine Usability engineering 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Abascal, J., Arrue, M., Fajardo, I., Garay, N., and Tomas, J., Use of Guidelines to Automatically Verify Web Accessibility, Universal Access in the Information Society, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2004, pp. 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Accessibility solutions SSB, accessible at
  3. [3]
    Beirekdar, A., Keita, M., Noirhomme, M., Randolet, F., Vanderdonckt, J., and Mariage, C., Flexible Reporting for Automated Usability and Accessibility Evaluation of Web Sites, in Proc. of 10th IFIP TC 13 Int. Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT’2005 (Rome, 12–16 September 2005), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3585, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005, pp. 281–294.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Beirekdar, A., Vanderdonckt, J., and Noirhomme-Fraiture, M., A Framework and a Language for Usability Automatic Evaluation of Web Sites by Static Analysis of HTML Source Code, Chapter 29, in Ch. Kolski, J. Vanderdonckt (eds.), Proc. of 4th Int. Conf. on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces CADUI’2002 (Valenciennes, 15–17 May 2002), Kluwer Academics Pub., Dordrecht, 2002, pp. 337–348.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Beirekdar, A., Vanderdonckt, J., and Noirhomme-Fraiture, M., Kwaresmi– Knowledge-based Web Automated Evaluation Tool with Reconfigurable Guidelines Optimization, in C. Stephanidis (ed.), Proc. of 2nd Int. Conf. on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction UAHCI’2003 (Creete, 22–27 June 2003), Vol. 4, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 2003, pp. 1504–1508.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Blackmon, M.H., Kitajima, M., and Polson, P.G., Repairing Usability Problems Identified by the Cognitive Walkthrough for the Web, in Proc. of the ACM Conf. on Human Aspects in Computing Systems CHI’2003 (Ft. Lauderdale, 5–10 April 2003), ACM Press, New York, 2003, pp. 497–504.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Blackmon, M.H., Kitajima, M., and Polson, P.G., Tool for Accurately Predicting Website Navigation Problems, Non-Problems, Problem Severity, and Effectiveness of Repairs, in Proc. of the ACM Conf. on Human Aspects in Computing Systems CHI’2005 (Portland, 2–7 April 2005), ACM Press, New York, 2005, pp. 31–40.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Cooper, M., Limbourg, Q., Mariage, C., and Vanderdonckt, J., Integrating Universal Design into a Global Approach for Managing Very Large Web Sites, in A. Kobsa, C. Stephanidis (eds.), Proc. of the 5th ERCIM Workshop on User Interfaces for All UI4ALL’99 (Dagstuhl, 28 November-1 December 1999), GMD Report 74, GMD – Forschungszentrum Informationstechnik GmbH, Sankt Augustin, 1999, pp. 131–150.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Deque Ramp Product page, accessible at
  10. [10]
    Farenc, Ch., Liberati, V., and Barthet, M.-F., Automatic Ergonomic Evaluation: What are the Limits?, in J. Vanderdonckt (ed.), Proc. of the 2nd Int. Workshop on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces CADUI’96 (Namur, 5–7 June 1996), Presses Universitaires de Namur, Namur, 1996, pp. 159–170.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Gaedke, M., Nussbaumer, M., and Meinecke, J., An Agile System Facilitating the Production of Service-Oriented Web Applications, in M. Matera, S. Comai (eds.), “Engineering Advanced Web Applications”, Rinton Press, Paramus, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Ivory, M.Y., and Megraw, R., Evolution of Web Site Design Patterns, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 23, No. 4, October 2005, pp 463–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Luque-Centeno, V., Delgado-Kloos, C., Arias-Fisteus, J., and Alvarez-Alvarez, L., Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools: a Survey and some Improvements, in M. Alpuente, S. Escobar, M. Falaschi (eds.), Proc. of First International Workshop on Automated Specification and Verification of Web Sites WWV’05 (Valencia, 14–15 March 2005), Valecnia, 2005, pp. 83–96.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    The Semantic Web Accessibility Platform SWAP homepage, accessible at
  15. [15]
    UsableNet web solutions homepage, accessible at
  16. [16]
    Vanderdonckt, J., Beirekdar, A., and Noirhomme-Fraiture, M., Automated Evaluation of Web Usability and Accessibility by Guideline Review, in N. Koch, P. Fraternali, M. Wirsing (eds.), Proc. of 4th Int. Conf. on Web Engineering ICWE’04 (Munich, 28–30 July 2004), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3140, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004, pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Web Accessibility Verifier A-Prompt, accessible at
  18. [18]
    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, W3C Recommendation, 5 May 1999, accessible at

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnaud Jasselette
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marc Keita
    • 1
  • Monique Noirhomme-Fraiture
    • 1
  • Frédéric Randolet
    • 1
  • Jean Vanderdonckt
    • 2
  • Christian Van Brussel
    • 2
  • Donatien Grolaux
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut d’InformatiqueFacultés Universitaires Notre-Dame de la PaixNamurBelgium
  2. 2.School of Management (IAG)Université catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations