Integrated Soil Fertility Management Technologies:review for scaling up

  • Michael Misiko
  • Joshua Ramisch


It is recognised that smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa significantly depend on land for their livelihoods. Nevertheless, these livelihoods are constrained by inherent low soil fertility. Over a long time, researchers and farmers have battled to arrest soil fertility degradation. Over the last decade, this battle has resulted in the development of integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) technologies. Between 2001 and 2004, Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility (TSBF) researchers and local small-holder farmers in western Kenya have been adapting these technologies to local circumstances under the community-based initiative called Strengthening Folk Ecology (FE). This initiative involved participatory demonstration-trials and dialogue as principal methods in the learning and adaptation process. Follow up studies have been undertaken to identify successful cases of this process. Initial results show that although such cases are few and far between, they are promising and benefits need to be scaled up for wider use by farmers in areas beyond the FE sites. Nevertheless, scaling ISFM technologies is complicated. ISFM technologies are knowledge intensive and their adaptations and applications are diverse. This paper provides insights into this problem by discussing selected ISFM technologies with regard to their inherent scalability


scaling up ISFM technologies partnerships 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. de Fliert E., Asmunati R. and Tantowijoyo W. 1999. Paper presented at the CIAT Workshop “Working with farmers: the key to adoption of forage technologies”, 12–15 October 1999, Cayagan de Oro, Philippines.Google Scholar
  2. Edwards M. and Hulme M. 1992. Scaling up NGO impact on development: learning from experience. Development in Practice:. ISSN; 0961–4524. Editor: Deborah Eade. Volume 2, No 2.Google Scholar
  3. Franzel S., Cooper P. and Denning G.L. 2001. Scaling up the benefits of agroforestry research: lessons learned and research challenges. Development: learning from experience, volume 11, no 4, August.Google Scholar
  4. Giller K.E. 2001. Nitrogen fixation in tropical cropping systems. 2nd edition. Wallington: CAB International.Google Scholar
  5. Gündel S., Hancock J. and Anderson S. 2001. Scaling-up strategies for research in natural resources management: a comparative review. Natural Resources Institute (NRI), Chatham, UK. 61 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Haagmann J., Chuma E., Murwira K. and Connolly M. 1999. Putting process into practice: operationalising participatory extension. In, Agricultural Research and extension Network paper 94. July.Google Scholar
  7. Harrington, L., White, J., Grace, P., Hodson, D., Hartkamp, A.D., Vaughan, C and Meisner, C. (2001). Delivering the goods: scaling out results of natural resource management research. Conservation Ecology 5(2): 19.Google Scholar
  8. IFDC 2003. Integrated soil fertility management. Available at: (accessed March 14, 2004).Google Scholar
  9. IIRR 1998. Sustainable agriculture extension manual for Eastern and Southern Africa. Nairobi: International Institute of Rural Reconstruction.Google Scholar
  10. IIRR 2000. Going to scale: Can we bring more benefits to more people, more quickly? International Institute for Rural Reconstruction (IIRR), Silang, Cavite, Philippines.Google Scholar
  11. ILEIA Eds. 2000. Unleashing the Creativity of Farmers. ILEIA Newsletter, July, 2000. Centre for Research and Information on Low External Input and Sustainable Agriculture.Google Scholar
  12. Kolavalli S. and Kerr J. 2002. Scaling up participatory watershed development in India. IN, development and Change 33(2): Hague: Blackwell. Pp. 213–235.Google Scholar
  13. LEISA Magazine. OCTOBER 2001. Available from: (Accessed on March 12, 2004).Google Scholar
  14. Loevinsohn, M., G. Meijerink, and B. Salasya. 1998. ȌIntegrated Pest Management in Smallholder Farming Systems in Kenya.” Kenya Agricultural Reserch Institute. Nairobi, Kenya. Misiko M. 2001. the potential of community institutions in dissemination and adoption of agricultural technologies in Emuhaya, Kenya. M.A. thesis. Nairobi: University of Nairobi.Google Scholar
  15. Pound P., Snapp S., McDougall C. and Braun A. (Eds.) 2003 Managing natural resources for sustainable livelihoods. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  16. Proctor F. 2003. Implementation of the Rural Strategy Scaling-up of development practice. Available from: http://www.worldbank. org/watsan/waterweek2003/Presentations/Session_Scalingup_WatershedManagementProjects/FelicityProctor_PPT.pdf (accessed March 14, 2004).Google Scholar
  17. TSBF-CIAT defines strategic direction for 2003-2007. 2003. The Comminutor: Newsletter of the TSBF Institute of CIAT. Nairobi: Kenya.Google Scholar
  18. Uvin P. and Miller D. 1994. Scaling Up: Thinking through the Issues. World Hunger Program Research Report 1994-1, available from: http: // / Departments /World_Hunger_Program /hungerweb/WHP/SCALINGU_ToC.html. (Accessed March 11, 2004).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Misiko
    • 1
  • Joshua Ramisch
    • 2
  1. 1.Anthropologist and a student at the TechnologyAgrarian Development Chair-group of Wageningen University and Research CentreThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Human Ecologist and the Social Science Officer of TSBF-CIATNairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations