Advertisement

Moving methodologies to enhance agricultural productivity of rice-based lowland systems in sub-Saharan Africa

  • M.C.S. Wopereis
  • T. Defoer

Abstract

The irrigated and rainfed lowland production systems in sub-Saharan Africa offer great potential to improve food security in the region. Rice yields in these systems are presently only at about 40 to 60% of the climate-determined yield potential across agro-ecological zones. To increase agricultural productivity a holistic approach to technology development is needed. This process is called integrated rice management (IRM), which is based on agro-ecological principles and on holistic thinking with wide ranges of technological options that encompass the entire rice cropping cycle. In both irrigated and rainfed lowland systems key factors for raising productivity are soil fertility and weed management. Improved soil fertility and weed management in irrigated systems in Senegal are highly profitable; yields can be raised by 2 t ha- 1, closing the yield gap between actual and potential yield by 30%. In inland valley lowlands improving soil fertility and weed management also results in substantial yield increases, depending on water control. We compare approaches used to technology development in Sahelian irrigated systems and in inland valley systems in Côte d’Ivoire. We illustrate that the need for early farmer participation in technology development increases when moving from the relatively uniform high-precision Sahelian irrigated farming systems to the more diverse, low-precision inland valley lowland systems further south. Technologies need to be more flexible and less fine-tuned in the inland valley systems as compared to the Sahelian irrigated systems. More emphasis also needs to be placed on farmer innovations and adaptation according to the prevailing agro-ecological and socio-economic conditions rather than on technology prescriptions, and on farmer-experimentation. Scaling-out of results in the Sahelian irrigated systems was done through change agents of NGOs and national extension authorities and publicity campaigns. Scaling-out of results in the inland valleys relied on the establishment of rural knowledge centers and farmer-to-farmer training. R&D institutions have a much more facilitating role rather than a directing role, when comparing the irrigated Sahelian systems with the inland valley lowlands. In both systems, simple decision support tools, such as a cropping calendar can be extremely valuable to farmers. WARDA and IFDC have developed a participatory learning and action research (PLAR) curriculum for IRM in rice-based inland valley systems. Ultimately IRM needs to move to other aspects of integrated natural resources management (INRM) within a watershed or water basin that are relevant to stakeholders. However, the peoples-orientation, typical for PLAR, will be the leading principle, be it IRM or INRM.

Keywords

Weed Management Irrigate Rice Soil Fertility Management Valley System Field Crop Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andriesse, W., 1986. Wetlands in sub-Saharan Africa: Area and distribution. In: Juo, A.S.R. and Lowe, J.A. (editors). The wetlands and rice in sub-Saharan Africa. Proceedings of an international conference on wetland utilization for rice production in sub-Saharan Africa, 4–8 November 1985, Ibadan, Nigeria. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, PMB 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp. 15–30.Google Scholar
  2. Clampett, W.S., 2001. Integrated crop management and technology transfer in the New South Wales rice industry: the Australian Ricecheck model. FAO International Rice Commission Newsletter 50: 7–17.Google Scholar
  3. Defoer, T., Wopereis, M.C.S., Idinoba, P. and Kadisha, T., 2004a. Curriculum d’apprentissage participatif et recherche action pour la gestion intégrée de la culture de riz de bas-fonds en Afrique sub-Saharienne: Manuel du facilitateur. WARDA / IFDC / CTA (English and French versions in press).Google Scholar
  4. Defoer, T., Wopereis, M.C.S., Idinoba, P. Kadisha, T., 2004b. Learning for change: rice management in inland valley lowlands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment (submitted).Google Scholar
  5. Defoer, T., Wopereis, M.C.S., Jones, M.P., Lançon, F., Erenstein, O., 2003. Challenges, innovation and change: towards rice-based food security in sub-Saharan Africa. Paper presented at the 20th session of the International Rice Commission, FAO, Bangkok, 23–25 July 2002.Google Scholar
  6. Defoer, T., Budelman, A. (editors), 2000. Managing soil fertility in the tropics: a resource guide for participatory learning and action research. Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Royal Tropical Institute (KIT).Google Scholar
  7. Dingkuhn, M., P.Y. Le Gal, 1996. Effect of drainage date on yield and dry matter partitioning in irrigated rice. Field Crops Research 46: 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dingkuhn M., 1995. Climatic determinants of irrigated rice performance in the Sahel. III. Characterizing environments by simulating the crop’s photothermal responses. Agricultural Systems, 48 : 435–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobermann, A., Witt, C., Dawe, D., Gines, G.C., Nagarajan, R., Satawathananont, S., Son, T.T., Tan, P.S., Wang, G.H., Chien, N.V., Thoa, C.T.K., Phung, C.V., Stalin, P., Muthukrishnan, P., Ravi, V., Babu, M., Chatuporn, S., Kongchum, M., Sun, Q., Fu, R., Simbahan, G.C., Adviento, M.A.A., 2002. Site-specific nutrient management for intensive rice cropping systems in Asia. Field Crops Research 74: 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donovan, C., M.C.S. Wopereis, D. Guindo, B. Nébié, 1999. Soil fertility management in irrigated rice systems in the Sahel and Savanna regions of West Africa. Part II. Profitability and risk analysis. Field Crops Research 61: 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donovan, C., K.M. Miézan, M.C.S. Wopereis, B.S. Diack, B. Douthwaite, 1998. Technology transfer from Asia to Africa sets the stage for public and private sector collaboration in new technology in Senegal. IRRN 23 (2): 41–42.Google Scholar
  12. Häfele, S., Wopereis, M.C.S., Donovan, C., Maubuisson, J., 2001. Improving productivity and profitability of irrigated rice production in Mauritania. European Journal of Agronomy 14 (3): 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Häfele, S., Johnson, D.E., Diallo, S., Wopereis, M.C.S., Janin, I., 2000. Improved soil fertility and weed management is profitable for irrigated rice farmers in Sahelian Africa. Field Crops Research 66: 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Idinoba, P.A., Wopereis, M.C.S., Erenstein, O., Kent, R., Johnson, D. Incremental yield and productivity gains from improved soil fertility and weed management under varying degrees of water control in inland valley lowlands in Côte d’Ivoire. European Journal of Agronomy (in preparation).Google Scholar
  15. Kebbeh M. & Miézan K.M., 2003. Ex-ante evaluation of integrated crop management options for irrigated rice production in the Senegal River Valley. Field Crops Research, 81: 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nguyen, V.N., and Tran, D.V., 2002. Issues and challenges of sustainable rice production for food security in sub-Saharan Africa. Working paper FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  17. Reece, D., Sumberg, J. and Pommier, L., 2004. Matching technologies with potential end users: a knowledge engineering approach for agricultural research management. Journal of Agricultural Economics 55(1): 25–40.Google Scholar
  18. Windmeijer, P.N. and W. Andriesse (editors), 1994. Inland valleys in West Africa: an agro-ecological characterization of rice-growing environments. ILRI publication 52, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  19. WARDA and SAED, 2000. Manuel pratique pour la riziculture irriguée dans la vallée du fleuve Sénégal. ADRAO, BP 96, St. Louis, Senegal, 80 pp. + annexes.Google Scholar
  20. Wopereis, M.C.S., Defoer, T., Idinoba, P., Dugué, M.J., Diack, S., 2004. Curriculum d’apprentissage participatif et recherche action pour la gestion intégrée de la culture de riz de bas-fonds en Afrique sub-Saharienne: Manuel technique. WARDA/IFDC/CTA (English and French versions in press).Google Scholar
  21. Wopereis, M.C.S., Haefele, S.M., Dingkuhn, M., Sow, A., 2003. Decision support tools for irrigated rice-based systems in the Sahel. In: Struif-Bontkes, T.E. and Wopereis, M.C.S. (editors). Decision support tools for smallholder agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa: A practical guide. IFDC (An International Center for Soil Fertility and Agricultural Development), P.O. Box 2040 Muscle Shoals, Alabama 45662, USA and ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), Postbus 380, 6700 AJ Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 114–126.Google Scholar
  22. Wopereis, M.C.S., C. Donovan, B. Nebié, D. Guindo, M.K. N’Diaye, 1999. Soil fertility management in irrigated rice systems in the Sahel and Savanna regions of West Africa. Part I. Agronomic analysis. Field Crops Research 61: 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wopereis, M.C.S., K.M. Miézan, C. Donovan, A.M. Ndiaye, B. Douthwaite, 1998. A new Senegalese Thresher / Cleaner responds to small-farmer post-harvest needs. IRRN 23 (2):39–41.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M.C.S. Wopereis
    • 1
  • T. Defoer
    • 2
  1. 1.An International Center for Soil Fertility and Agricultural Development (IFDC) – Africa DivisionLoméTogo
  2. 2.International Center for development oriented Research in Agriculture (ICRA), Agropolis InternationalAvenue AgropolisFrance

Personalised recommendations