Examining the Preferences of Health Care Providers: An application to hospital consultants
The aim of this chapter is to show how discrete choice experiments (DCEs) can be applied to examine the preferences of health care providers. Health care providers comprise health care organisations and health professionals employed within them. Health professionals make decisions about their supply of labour in addition to clinical decisions. A key policy issue across many developed and developing countries is shortages of health professionals, particularly doctors and nurses. Although a number of policies are being introduced and have been suggested to reduce these shortages, there is little empirical evidence on what factors influence the labour market behaviour of doctors and nurses. Evidence on the relative impact of pay and remuneration on job choices and labour supply has shown that pecuniary factors do matter, but that their effect may be moderate. This raises the issue of what non-pecuniary job characteristics might be altered by policy to increase recruitment and retention. Existing “revealed preference” administrative and survey data do not collect good information on these non-pecuniary job characteristics. DCEs are a method that can be used to inform this issue (Scott, 2001). This chapter focuses on the labour market decisions of hospital consultants in the UK.
KeywordsFatigue Income Rosen Marin
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blair, M. 2002. Review body on doctors’ and dentists’ remuneration. Thirty-first report. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Booth, A. and Francesconi, M. 1999. Job mobility in 1990s Britain: does gender matter? Working papers of the Institute for Social and Economic Research. Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar
- Bradley, M. 1991. User’s manual for SPEED version 2.1 sated preference experiment editor and designer. The Hague: Hague Consulting Group.Google Scholar
- Department of Health. 2001. The NHS Plan. Proposal for a new approach to the consultant contract. London: Department of Health.Google Scholar
- Elliot, R., Mavromaras, K., Scott, A., Bell, D., der Pol, M. and Gerova, V. 2002. Labour markets and NHS Scotland. Final Report to Scottish Executive Health Department, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
- Manski C.F. and McFadden D. (eds). 1977. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- McFadden, D. 1974b. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Frontiers in Econometrics. Zarembka, P. (ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Ryan, M. and Gerard, K. 2002. Using discrete choice experiments in health economics: moving forward. In: Advances in Health Economics. Scott, A., Maynard, A. and Elliott, R. (eds). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Viscusi, W.K. 1993. The value of risks to life and health. Journal of Economic Literature, vol 31, 1912–1946.Google Scholar
- Zwerina, K., Huber, J. and Kuhfeld, W. 1996. A general method for constructing efficient choice designs. Durham, NC: Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.Google Scholar
- M. Ryan, K. Gerard and M. Amaya-Amaya (eds.), Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health Care, 153–171.Google Scholar