This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amrein, A., & Berliner, D. (2002). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Accessed on February 23, 2004, Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18
Anyon, J. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
Bascia, N. (1996). Caught in the crossfire: Restructuring, collaboration and the “problem” school. Urban Education, 31(2), 177–198.
Berne, R., & Stiefel, L. (1999). Concepts of school finance. In H. Ladd, R. Chalk, & J. Hansen (Eds.), Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives (pp. 7–34). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Boissevain, J., & Mitchell, J. C. (Eds.). (1973). Network analysis: Studies in human interaction. Paris: Mouton.
Brophy, J. E. (1982). Successful teaching strategies for the inner-city child. Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 527–530.
Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Carr, M., & Fuhrman, S. (1999). The politics of school finance in the 1990s. In H. Ladd, R. Chalk, & J. Hansen (Eds.), Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives (pp. 136–175). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Chrispeels, J. H. (1992). Purposeful restructuring: Creating a culture for learning and achievement in elementary schools. London: Falmer.
Christman, J. R., & Rhodes, A. (2002). Civic engagement and urban school improvement: Hard to learn lessons from Philadelphia. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education. Accessed on February 23, 2004, Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/Publications/children07.pdf
Cibulka, J. (2003). Educational bankruptcy, takeovers, and reconstitutions. In W. L. Boyd, & D. Miretzky (Eds.), American educational governance on trial: Change and challenges (pp. 249–271). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cibulka, J. G., & Derlin, R. L. (1998). Accountability policy adoption to policy sustainability: Reforms and systemic initiatives in Colorado and Maryland. Education and Urban Society, 30, 502–513.
Clune, W. (1998). Toward a theory of systemic reform: The case of nine NSF statewide systemic initiatives (Research Monograph No. 16). Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education.
Clune, W. (2001). Toward a theory of standards-based reform: The case of nine NSF statewide systemic initiatives. In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), From the capital to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the United States (pp. 13–39). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cohen, D., & Hill, H. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Cotton, K. (1995). Effective schooling practices: A research synthesis – 1995 update. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Accessed on June 5, 2003, Retrieved from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/esp/esp95toc.html
Cuban, L. (2003). Why is it so hard to get good schools? New York: Teachers College Press.
Datnow, A., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H. (2002). Extending educational reform: From one school to many. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Datnow, A., & Kemper, E. (2002, March). From statehouse to schoolhouse: The implementation of comprehensive school reform in the era of CSRD (Report prepared as a deliverable to OERI, U.S. Department of Education for CRESPAR Project 4.2.). Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk, Johns Hopkins University.
Datnow, A., Lasky, S., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (2006). Successful school reform in diverse communities. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Desimone, L., Porter, A., Garet, M., Suk Yoon, K., & Birman, B. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year long study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–113.
Elmore, R. F., & Burney, D. (1997). School variation and systemic instructional improvement in Community School District #2, New York City. Unpublished manuscript.
Elmore, R. F., & Burney, D. (1998). Continuous improvement in Community District #2, New York City. Unpublished manuscript.
Elmore, R., & Fuhrman, S. (2001). Holding schools accountable: Is it working. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 67–72.
Felner, R. D. (2005). The Center for Research-Based Educational Improvement and Assessment: Support and continuous improvement of No Child Left Behind in Kentucky. Deliverable to the U. S. Department of Education. Louisville, KY: College of Education and Human Development.
Finnigan, K., O’Day, J., & Wakelyn, D. (2003). External support to schools on probation: Getting a leg up? Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education. Accessed on February 24, 2004, Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/Publications/Chicago.pdf
Goldenberg, C. (1996). Effective schooling for LEP students: The school domain. Paper prepared for the Committee on Developing a Research Agenda on the Education of Limited English Proficient and Bilingual Students. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Guthrie, J., & Rothstein, R. (1999). Enabling “adequacy” to achieve reality: Translating adequacy into state school finance distribution. In H. Ladd, R. Chalk, & J. Hansen (Eds.), Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives (pp. 209–260). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94, 328–355.
Hamann, E. (2002, April). The politics of bilingual education, Latino student accommodation, and school district management in Southern Appalachia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Hamann, E., & Lane, B. (2002). “We’re from the state and we’re here to help”: State-level innovations in support of high school improvement. Providence, RI: Education Alliance for Equity in the Nation’s Schools, Brown University.
Hannaway, J. (2003). Accountability, assessment, and performance issues: We’ve come a long way, or have we? In W. L. Boyd, & D. Miretzky (Eds.), American educational governance on trial: Change and challenges (pp. 20–37). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hatch, T. (2000). Incoherence in the system: Three perspectives on the implementation of multiple initiatives in one district. Stanford, CT: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Henig, J., Hula, R., Orr, M., & Pedescleaux, D. (1999). The color of school reform: Race, politics, and the challenge of urban education. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Horn, J. (2000a). A case study of the Humphreys County (Mississippi) School District and its role as a partner in the NSF-supported Delta Rural Systemic Initiative (RSI). Evaluation Report. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo Evaluation Center. Paper retrieved May 15, 2002 from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/rsi/humphreys.html
Horn, J. (2000b). A case study of Rockcastle County (Kentucky) School District and its role as a partner in the NSF-supported Appalachian Rural Systemic Initiative. Prepared for the NSF Rural Systemic Initiatives Evaluation Study, The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo. Accessed on September 15, 2002, Retrieved from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/rsi/rockcastle.html
Hubbard, L., Mehan, H., & Stein, M. K. (2006). Reform as learning: When school reform collided with organizational culture and community politics in San Diego. New York: Routledge.
Knapp, M. S. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning (Research Monograph No. 1). Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National Institute for Science Education.
Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1982). Network analysis. (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series Number 07–028). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ladd, H., & Hansen, J. (Eds.). (1999). Making money matter: Financing America’s schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Lasky, S. (2004). A policy framework for analyzing educational system effects (CRESPAR Technical Report No. 71). Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk, Johns Hopkins University.
Lasky, S., & Datnow, A. (2006, April). Systemic linkages in the implementation of Comprehensive School Reform models. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Levine, D. U., Levine, R. F., & Eubanks, E. E. (1985). Successful implementation of instruction at inner-city schools. Journal of Negro Education, 54(3), 313–332.
Livingston, D. R., & Livingston, S. M. (2002). Failing Georgia: The case against the ban on social promotion. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(49). Accessed February 23, 2004, Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n49
Lusi, S. (1997). The role of state departments of education in complex school reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
Mac Iver, M., & Farley, L. (2003). Bringing the district back in: The role of the central office in improving instruction and student achievement (Report No. 65). Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk, Johns Hopkins University.
Massell, D. (1998). State strategies for building capacity in education: Progress and continuing challenges (CPRE Research Series RR-41). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education. Accessed on February 23, 2004, Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/Publications/rr41.pdf
Massell, D., & Goertz, M. (2002). District strategies for building instructional capacity. In A. Hightower, M. Knapp, J. Marsh, & M. McLaughlin (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (pp. 43–61). New York: Teachers College.
McIntyre, E., & Kyle, D. (2002). Nongraded primary programs: Possibilities for improving practice for teachers (Practitioner Brief No. 4). Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Education. Accessed on December 1, 2002, Retrieved from http://crede.ucsc.edu/products/print/pract_briefs/pb4.shtml
McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
McNeil, L., & Valenzuela, A. (2001). The harmful impact of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the policy rhetoric. In G. Orfield, & M. Kornhaber (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers: Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education (pp. 127–151). New York: The Century Foundation Press.
Mintrop, H. (2004). High-stakes accountability, state oversight, and educational equity (2004). Teachers College Record, 106, 2128–2145.
National Commission of Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
O’Day, J., & Gross, B. (1999, April). One system or two? Title I accountability in a context of high stakes for schools in local districts and schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
Oakes, J., Quartz, K. H., Ryan, S., & Lipton, M. (2000). Becoming good American schools: The struggle for civic virtue in educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Odden, A., & Clune, W. (1998). School finance systems: Aging structures in need of repair. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 157–177.
Pankratz, R. S., & Petrosko, J. M. (Eds.). (2000). All children can learn: Lessons from the Kentucky reform experience. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative research and evaluation research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Reynolds, D., Creemers, B., Stringfield, S., Teddlie, C., & Schaffer, E. (2002). World class schools: International perspectives on school effectiveness. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Reynolds, D., & Teddlie, C. (2000). The future agenda for school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie, & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 322–343). London: Falmer.
Rich, W. (1996). Black mayors and school politics: The failure of reform in Detroit, Gary and Newark. New York: Garland Publishing Inc.
Rudo, Z. (2001). Corrective action in low-performing schools and school districts. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Developmental Laboratory.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.
Snipes, J., Doolittle, F., & Herlihy, C. (2002). Foundations for success: Case studies of how urban school systems improve student achievement. Washington, DC: Council of the Great City Schools.
Spillane, J. (1999). State and local government relations in the era of standards-based reform: Standards, state policy instruments, and the local instructional policy making. Educational Policy, 13, 546–572.
Stein, M. K., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H. (2002, April). Reform ideas that travel far afield: The two cultures of reform in New York City’s District #2 and San Diego. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Stone, C. (1998). Civic capacity and urban school reform. In C. Stone (Ed.), Changing urban education (pp. 250–277). Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Stone, C., Henig, J., Jones, B., & Pierannuzi, C. (2001). Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Stringfield, S. C., & Yakimowski-Srebnick, M. E. (2005). Promise, progress, problems, and paradoxes of three phases of accountability: A longitudinal case study of the Baltimore City Public Schools. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 43–75.
Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. (2000). The influence of standards-based reform on classroom practices and culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 963–980.
Taylor, B. O. (Ed.). (1990). Case studies in effective schools research. Madison, WI: National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1985). A differential analysis of effectiveness in middle and lower socioeconomic status schools. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 20(2), 38–44.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference: Lessons learned from a 10-year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press.
Teddlie, C., Stringfield, S., & Reynolds, D. (2000). Context issues within school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie, & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 160–185). London: Falmer.
Tharp, R. G., Estrada, P., Dalton, S. S., & Yamauchi, L. A. (2000). Teaching transformed: Achieving excellence, fairness, inclusion and harmony. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Tharp, R. G., Lewis, H., Hilberg, R., Bird, C., Epaloose, G., & Dalton, S. S. (1999). Seven more mountains and a map: Overcoming obstacles to reform in Native American schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 4(1), 5–25.
Togneri, W., & Anderson, S. E. (2003). Beyond islands of excellence: What districts can do to improve instruction and achievement in all schools. Washington, DC: The Learning First Alliance and the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1999). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. In M. Granovetter (Series Ed.), Structural analysis in the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. D. (Eds.). (1988). Social structures: A network approach. In M. Granovetter (Series Ed.), Structural analysis in the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wimpelberg, R., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1989). Sensitivity to context: The past and future of effective schools research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(1), 82–107.
Yakimowski, M. (2004). No Child Left Behind: A focus on accountability. Baltimore, MD: Baltimore City Public Schools System.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lasky, S., Datnow, A., Stringfield, S., Sundell, K. (2007). Diverse Populations and School Effectiveness and Improvement in the USA. In: Townsend, T. (eds) International Handbook of School Effectiveness and Improvement. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5747-2_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5747-2_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4805-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5747-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)