20 Years of ICSEI: The Impact of School Effectiveness and School Improvement on School Reform

  • Tony Townsend
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 17)

Keywords

Europe Turkey Nism Malaysia Argentina 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blakey, L., & Heath, A. F. (1992). Differences between comprehensive schools: Some preliminary findings. In P. Cuttance, & D. Reynolds (Eds.), Schools effectiveness: Research, policy and pratice (pp. 96–121). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  2. Brookover, W. B., Beady, C., Flood, P. K., & Schweitzer, J. H. (1979). School social systems and student achievement: Schools can make a difference. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., Mc Partland, J., Mood, A., Weinfield, F., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Printing Office.Google Scholar
  4. Creemers, B., & Osinga, N. (1995). ICSEI country reports. Leeuwarden, the Netherlands: GCO.Google Scholar
  5. Creemers, B., Peters, T., & Reynolds, D. (Eds.). (1989). School effectiveness and school improvement. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  6. Cuban, L. (1989). The “at-risk” label and the problem of school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 71(8), 780–801.Google Scholar
  7. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15–27.Google Scholar
  8. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94, 328–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris, A., & Chrispeels, J. H. (Eds.). (2006). Improving schools and educational systems: International perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Jencks, C., Smith, M., Ackland, H., Bane, M., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., et al. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: The junior years. Somerset: Open Books.Google Scholar
  12. Murphy, J. (1991). Restructuring schools: Capturing and assessing the phenomena. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  13. Nuttall, D., Goldstein, H., Prosser, R., & Rasbash, J. (1989). Differential school effectiveness, International Journal of Educational Research, special issue Developments in School Effectiveness Research, 13, 763–776.Google Scholar
  14. Nuttall, D. (1992). Letter to The Independent, 21 November.Google Scholar
  15. Reynolds, D. (1976) The delinquent school. In P. Woods (Ed.), The process of schooling (pp. 217–229). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Reynolds, D., & Teddlie, C. (2001). Reflections on the critics, and beyond them. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P., & Ouston, J. with Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Scheerens, J., & Creemers, B. P. M. (1989). (Eds.). School effectiveness and improvement: Proceedings of the First International Congress. Groningen: Rion.Google Scholar
  19. Slee, R., & Weiner, G. (2001). Education reform and reconstruction as a challenge to research genres: Reconsidering school effectiveness research and inclusive schooling. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Slee, R., & Weiner, G. with Tomlinson, S. (1998). School effectiveness for whom? London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  21. Smink, G. (1991). The Cardiff conference, ICSEI 1991. Network News International, 1(3), 2–6.Google Scholar
  22. Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (1991). Schools as affectors of teacher effects. In H. Waxman, & H. Walberg (Eds.), Effective teaching: Current research (pp. 161–179). Berkeley: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  23. Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (Eds.). (2000). International handbook of school effectiveness research. London & New York: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  24. Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2001). Countering the critics: Responses to recent criticisms of school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 41–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference: Let’s be realistic! School mix, school effectiveness and the social limits of reform. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Thrupp, M. (2001). Sociological and political concerns about school effectiveness research: Time for a new research agenda. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Townsend, T., Clarke, P., & Ainscow, M. (1999). Third millennium schools: A world of difference in effectiveness and improvement. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  28. Weber, G. (1971). Inner city children can be taught to read: Four successful school. Washington, D.C.: Council for Basic Education.Google Scholar
  29. Wildy, H., & Dimmock, C. (1992). Instructional leadership in Western Australian primary and secondary school. Nedlands: University of Western Australia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tony Townsend

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations