Advertisement

Constructing Physical Input-Output Tables with Material Flow Analysis (MFA) Data: Bottom-Up Case Studies

  • Ottilia De Marco
  • Giovanni Lagioia
  • Vera Amicarelli
  • Antonella Sgaramella
Part of the Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science book series (ECOE, volume 23)

In an economic system that aims at sustainable development, material indicators become increasingly more important than monetary indicators, as much of the literature now testifies (Ayres and Ayres 1998). Monetary indicators are often not able to reveal all the implications and interactions between the biosphere and technosphere (Nebbia 2000; De Marco et al. 2001).

The knowledge of these indicators is an essential requisite to evaluate the environmental impacts caused by human activities. The scarcity of information on the amount and the quality of waste flows, from the economic system to the biosphere, makes the evaluation of environmental impacts and the choice of an adequate disposal system both very difficult (Ayres and Ayres 1997; Nakamura and Kondo 2002).

Keywords

Sugar Beet Sugar Industry Electricity Sector Sugar Mill Aluminum Industry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amicarelli, V., Lagioia, G., … De Marco, O. (2004). Aluminium industrial metabolism, a commodity science contribution. Forum Ware International 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
  2. ANPA-ONR (2001). I Rifiuti del comparto agroalimentare'. Unità Normativa Tecnica Report No. 11 (pp. 107–138).Google Scholar
  3. ANPA (2002). Rifiuti industriali. Metodologie di calcolo dei coefficienti di produzione, ANPA, Dipartimento Stato dell'Ambiente, Controlli e Sistemi Informativi, Report No. 18 (p. 144).Google Scholar
  4. Ayres, R. U. (1978). Resources, environment, and economics. Applications of the Materials/Energy Balance principle. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  5. Ayres, R. U., … Ayres, L. W. (1997). Use of materials balances to estimate aggregate waste generation in the United States. In P. C. Schulze (Ed.), Measures of environmental performance and ecosystem condition (pp. 96–156). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ayres, R. U., … Ayres, L. W. (1998). Accounting for resources, 1 Economy-wide applications of mass-balance principles to materials and waste. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Bailey, R., Bras, B., … Allen, J. K. (2004). Applying ecological input-output flow analysis to material flows in industrial systems: Part II: Flow metrics. Journal of Industrial Economics 8(1–2), 69–91.Google Scholar
  8. Bringezu, S. (1997). Material flows indicators. In B. Moldan, S. Billharz … R. Matravers (Eds.), Sustainability indicators (pp. 168–176). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Brunner, P. H., … Recheberger, H. (2004). Practical handbook of material flow analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.Google Scholar
  10. Daly, H. E. (1968). On economics as a life science. Journal of Political Economics 76(83), 392–406.Google Scholar
  11. De Marco, O., Lagioia, G., … Pizzoli, E. (2001). Material flow analysis of the Italian economy. Journal of Industrial Economics 4(2), 55–70.Google Scholar
  12. De Marco, O., Lagioia, G., … Sgaramella, A. (2002). L'analisi del ciclo di produzione dello zucchero, Considerazioni preliminari, in Euroconference on University and Enterprise A partnership for training, research, employment and social development, Roma 26–28 Settembre (pp. 399–407).Google Scholar
  13. De Marco, O., Lagioia, G., … Sgaramella, A. (2003). Material flow analysis of sugar beet cultivation, in Quo vadis MFA? Workshop, Wuppertal 8–10 October.Google Scholar
  14. De Marco, O., Lagioia, G., Amicarelli, V., … Sgaramella, A. (2004). Flusso di Materia e Ciclo di Vita dello Zucchero da Barbabietola. In XXI Congresso Nazionale di Merceologia, Risorse naturali e sviluppo economico-sociale. Contributi delle Scienze Merceologiche, Foggia 22–24 settembre, Wip Edizioni, Bari.Google Scholar
  15. Giljum, S., … Hubacek, K. (2004). Alternative approaches of physical input-output analysis to estimate primary material inputs of production and consumption activities. Economic Systems Research, 16(3), 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giljum, S., Hubacek, K., … Sun, L. (2004). Beyond the simple material balance: A reply to Sangwon Suh's note on physical input-output analysis. Ecological Economics, 48(1), 19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gravgård, O. (1999). Physical input-output tables for Denmark, 1990. Statistics Denmark.Google Scholar
  18. Kneese, A., Ayres, R. U., … D'Arge, R. C. (1970). Economics and the environment, a materials balance approach. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kytzia, S., Faist, M., … Baccini, P. (2004). Economically extended-MFA: A material flow approach for a better understanding of food production chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(8–10), 877–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lagioia, G., Amicarelli, V., … De Marco, O. (2005). Analisi dei flussi di materia nell'industria dell'alluminio. In Italia, Ambiente — Consulenza e pratica per l'impresa e gli enti locali, 13(7), 1–9 (2005). Preliminary results in The material basis of the Italian aluminium industry, Quo vadis MFA? Workshop, Wuppertal 8–10 October 2003.Google Scholar
  21. Leontief, W. (1970). Environmental repercussion and the economic structure an input-output approach. Reviews of Economics and Statistics, 52(3), 262–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakamura, S., … Kondo, Y. (2002). Input-output analysis of waste management. Journal of Industrial Economics, 6(1), 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nebbia, G. (1975). La matrice dei rifiuti. Rassegna Economics, 39(1), 37–62.Google Scholar
  24. Nebbia, G. (2000). Contabilità monetaria e contabilità ambientale. Economia Pubblica, 30(6), 5–33.Google Scholar
  25. Nebbia, G. (2003). Il prodotto interno materiale lordo dell'Italia. Economia … Ambiente, 22(5–6), 8–17.Google Scholar
  26. Stahmer, C. (2000). The magic triangle of input-output table. In S. Simon … J. Proops (Eds.), Greening the accounts (pp. 123–154). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  27. Stahmer, C. et al. (1997). Physical input-output tables for Germany, 1990. Federal Statistic Office.Google Scholar
  28. Strassert, G. (2000). Physical input-ouput accounting and analysis: New perspectives. In 13th International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Macerata Italy 21–25 August. Strassert, G. (2001). Physical input-output accounting. In A handbook of industrial ecology (pp. 102–113). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  29. Suh, S. (2003). A note on the calculus for physical input-output analysis and its application to land appropriation of international trade activities. Ecological Economics, 48, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ottilia De Marco
    • 1
  • Giovanni Lagioia
    • 1
  • Vera Amicarelli
    • 1
  • Antonella Sgaramella
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geographical and Commodity Science, Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of BariItaly

Personalised recommendations