Skip to main content

Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) as a Management Tool: An Emphasis on Electricity Generation, Global Climate Change, and Sustainability

  • Chapter
Book cover Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology

Part of the book series: Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science ((ECOE,volume 23))

  • 3476 Accesses

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) recommends the use of life-cycle assessment (LCA) to better comprehend and reduce environmental impacts related to manufactured products and services offered to our society. The principles of LCA are presented in the international standard ISO 14040; however, the implementation of the standard is not simple, and a couple of studies have addressed the existing limitations (Khan et al. 2002; Ross and Evans 2002).

One fundamental question is how to characterize a given environmental insult and how to select an appropriate metric to evaluate and minimize their impacts. This problem stem from the multiplicity of environmental insults caused by human activities, which are difficult to compare using a single approach. Moreover, most environmental problems have an intrinsic temporal dimension since environmental impacts persist in the environment for years and in some cases for generations. This yields sustainability concerns, which demand frameworks that allow the comparison of outcomes over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Enting, I. G., Wigley, T. M. L., & Heimann, M. (1994). Future emissions and concentrations of carbon dioxide: Key ocean/atmosphere/land analyses (CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research Technical Paper No. 31). Aspendale: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, L., Bélanger, C., & Uchiyama, Y. (2002). Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation options: The status of research in Year 2001. Energy Policy, 30(14), 1267–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwich, E. G., Hammitt, J. K., & Pease, W. S. (2000). A theoretical foundation for life-cycle assessment: Recognizing the role of values in environmental decision making. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(1), 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., & Johnson, C. A. (2001). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. New York: Cambridge University Press, 881 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeling, C. D., & Whorf, T. P. (2003). Atmospheric CO 2 concentrations (ppmv) derived from in situ air samples collected at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, Carbon Dioxide Research Group Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Retrieved August 7, 2003, from http:// cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/maunaloa-co2/maunaloa.co2.

  • Khan, F. I., Raveender, V., & Husain, T. (2002) Effective environmental management through life cycle assessment. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 15, 455–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, M., & Munksgaard, J. (2002). Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines — review and applications. Renewable Energy, 26, 339–362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, B., Davidson, O., Martens, J., Van Rooijen, S., & Van Wie Mcgrory, L. (2000). Methodological and technological issues in technology transfer, special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 432 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R., & Pan, J. (2001). Climate change 2001: Mitigation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 752 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic, N., & Swart, R. (2000). Emissions scenarios. Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 570 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J., & Ehrenfeld, J. (1996). Code green: Business adopts voluntary environmental standards. Environment, 38(1), 16–30

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, J. (1993). Ecology policy and politics. New York: Routledge, 227p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget (OMB). (2003). OMB Circular No. A-94, Office of Management and Budget, U.S. Presidency. Retrieved February 11, 2003, from http://www.whitehouse. gov/omb/circulars/a094/a94 appx-c.html.

  • ORNL/RFF (Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Resources for the Future). (1995). External costs and benefits of fuel cycles. Washington, DC: McGraw-Hill, Utility Data Institute, 7 Volumes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacca, S. (2004). Impacts from decommissioning of hydroelectric plants. (submitted to Climatic Change on July 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacca, S., & Horvath, A. (2002). Greenhouse gas emissions from building and operating electric power plants in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Environmental Science and Technology, 36(14), 3194–3200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penner, J. E., Lister, D. H., GriMgs, D. J., Dokken, D. J., & McFarland, M. (1999). Aviation and the global atmosphere, a special report of IPCC working groups I and III in collaboration with the scientific assessment panel to the Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 373 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portney, P. R., & Stavins, R. N. (2000). Public policies for environmental protection. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 294 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S., & Evans, D. (2002). Use of life cycle assessment in environmental management. Environmental Management, 29(1), 132–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol, R. S. J. (2003). Is the uncertainty about climate change too large for expected cost-benefit analysis? Climatic Change, 56(3), 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2004). Human Development Report 2004. Retrieved November 10, 2004, from http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2004/.

  • Watson, R. T. (2000). IPCC special report on land use, land-use change and forestry, intergovernmental panel on climate change. United Nations Environmental Program, World Meteorological Organization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 375 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. T., Zinyowera, M. C., & Moss, R. H. (1997). The regional impacts of climate change: An assessment of vulnerability, a special report of IPCC working group II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 517 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pacca, S. (2009). Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) as a Management Tool: An Emphasis on Electricity Generation, Global Climate Change, and Sustainability. In: Suh, S. (eds) Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5737-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics