Advertisement

Who Cares About Identity?

Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 35)

Abstract

This paper argues that transworld identity is both morally (or at least “welfare axiologically”) and prudentially insignificant. To clarify, it does not in itself morally or prudentially matter, when comparing welfare distributions across possible worlds, whether or not the same people exist in these worlds. The moral claim is defended on the basis of a (wide) person-affecting moral principle. And the argument is made that what matters from one’s own prudential point of view is not that one comes into existence or continues to exist oneself but that an appropriate continuer/replacement does. Finally, some implications for gene-therapy are considered.

Keywords

Personal identity Non-identity problem Person-affecting ethics Gene-therapy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appiah, K.A. 2005. The ethics of identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, D.M. 1997. A world of states of affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bayles, M.D. 1975–76. Harm to the unconceived. Philosophy and Public Affairs 5: 292–304.Google Scholar
  4. Broome, J. 1993. Goodness is reducible to betterness: The evil of death is the value of life. In The good and the economical, eds. P. Koslowski and Y. Shionoya, 70–84. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Carter, W.R. 1982. Do zygotes become people? Mind XCI: 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliot, R. 1993. Identity and the ethics of gene therapy. Bioethics 7: 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fehige, C. and U. Wessels. 1998. Preferences–An introduction. In Preferences, eds. C. Fehige and U. Wessels, xx–xliii. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  8. Garrett, B. 1990. Personal identity and extrinsicness. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 25: 23–40.Google Scholar
  9. Glover, J. 1977. Causing death and saving lives. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  10. Glover, J. 1992. Future people, disability, and screening. In Justice between age groups and generations, eds. P. Laslett and J.S. Fishkin, 127–43. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hanser, M. 1990. Harming future people. Philosophy and Public Affairs 19: 47–70.Google Scholar
  12. Heyd, D. 1992. Genethics. Moral issues in the creation of people. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Holtug, N. 1993. Human gene therapy: Down the slippery slope? Bioethics 7: 402–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holtug, N. 1997. Altering humans–The case for and against human gene therapy. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6: 157–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holtug, N. 1998. Egalitarianism and the levelling down objection. Analysis 58: 166–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holtug, N. 2001. On the value of coming into existence. Journal of Ethics 5: 361–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holtug, N. 2004. Person-affecting moralities. In The repugnant conclusion. Essays on population ethics, eds. J. Ryberg and T. Tännsjö, 129–61. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  18. Holtug, N. 2006. Personal identity, self-interest and preferences. In Philosophy and ethics, ed. L.V. Siegal, 59–114. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Holtug, N. forthcoming. Persons, interests and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Holtug, N. and P. Sandøe. 1996. Who benefits? Why personal identity does not matter in a moral evaluation of germ-line gene therapy. Journal of Applied Philosophy 13: 157–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kavka, G.S. 1982. The paradox of future individuals. Philosophy and Public Affairs 11: 93–112.Google Scholar
  22. Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Kuhse, H. and P. Singer. 1985. Should the baby live? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kymlicka, W. 1995. Multicultural citizenship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lewis, D. 1986. On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. McKie, J. 2001. Thinking about possible people: A comment on Tooley and Rachels. Bioethics 15: 146–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McMahan, J. 2002. The ethics of killing. Problems at the margins of life. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, D. 1995. On nationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  29. Noonan, H. 1989. Personal identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Oderberg, D. 1997. Modal properties, moral status and identity. Philosophy and Public Affairs 26: 259–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olson, E.T. 1997. The human animal. Personal identity without psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Parfit, D. 1971. Personal identity. The Philosophical Review 80: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parfit, D. 1976. On doing the best for our children. In Ethics and population, ed. M.D. Bayles, 100–15. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  34. Parfit, D. 1982. Future generations: Further problems. Philosophy and Public Affairs 11: 113–72.Google Scholar
  35. Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Parfit, D. 1995. The unimportance of identity. In Identity, ed. H. Harris, 13–45. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  37. Persson, I. 1995. Genetic therapy, identity and person-regarding reasons. Bioethics 9: 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Plantinga, A. 1979. Actualism and possible worlds. In The possible and the actual, ed. M.J. Loux, 253–73. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Roberts, M.A. 1998. Child versus childmaker: Future persons and present duties in ethics and the law. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  40. Shoemaker, S. 1984. Personal identity: A materialist’s account. In Personal identity, eds. S. Shoemaker and R. Swinburne, 67–138. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Snowdon, P.F. 1990. Persons, animals, and ourselves. In The person and the human mind, ed. C. Gill, 83–107. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  42. Stalnaker, R.C. 1979. Possible worlds. In The possible and the actual, ed. M.J. Loux, 225–34. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Temkin, L.S. 1993. Inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Tooley, M. 1983. Abortion and infanticide. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  45. Unger, P. 1990. Identity, consciousness and value. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Woodward, J. 1986. The non-identity problem. Ethics 96: 804–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zohar, N.J. 1991. Prospects for “genetic therapy”—Can a person benefit from being altered? Bioethics 4: 275–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy Section, Department of Media, Cognition and CommunicationUniversity of CopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations