The ageing of societies has strong implications for social security and for social gerontological analysis, while diversity, social inequality, and social justice are traditional core themes of sociology and social policy. Both perspectives are interrelated, as demographic transitions may, on the one hand, be influencing the social status attached to age and cohort membership. On the other hand, current reforms of welfare state systems – partly in reaction to demographic shifts, partly motivated by changing ideologies and ongoing processes of globalization – may have effects on the average welfare situations of people of different ages and cohorts and the distribution of these situations within age groups and cohorts. In the current debate, distributive relations between generations as age groups as well as birth cohorts are discussed as a crucial problem of inequality and justice in modern society. The role of generational equity in this debate is becoming increasingly dominant, both in Germany and in other European societies (Schmähl, 2004). However, the meaning of this term is still unclear and is used quite arbitrarily in current debates. Popular societal discourse in particular is characterised by a muddle of disparate ideas about social justice, distributive norms, and patterns (Tesch-Roemer and Motel-Klingebiel, 2004; Clasen and von Oorschot, 2002). Beyond doubt, there are problems with distribution and equity in most modern welfare states, as demonstrated by contemporary disputes; the assumption is often found that the young could be disadvantaged by the setting up of modern welfare regimes, while the old face enormous gains from the expansion of social security systems (Bommier et al., 2004; Price and Ginn, 2003).
Keywords
- Life Satisfaction
- Welfare State
- Social Inequality
- Welfare Regime
- Overall Life Satisfaction
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allardt, E. (1975) Dimensions of Welfare in a Comparative Scandinavian Study, Helsinki, Research Group for Comparative Sociology, Research reports.
Atkinson, A.B. (1983) The Economics of Inequality, Oxford, Clarendon.
Bäcker, G. and Koch, A. (2003) ‘Die Jungen als Verlierer? Alterssicherung und Generationengerechtigkeit’, WSI-Mitteilungen, 2, 111–117.
Bolte, K.M., Kappe, D., and Neidhardt, F. (1975) Soziale Ungleichheit, Opladen, Leske and Budrich.
Bommier, A., Lee, R., Miller, T., and Zuber, S. (2004) Who Wins and Who Loses? Public Transfer Accounts for US Generations Born 1850 to 2090, NBER Working Paper No. w10969, Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bulmahn, T. (2000) ‘Zur Entwicklung der Lebensqualität im vereinten Deutschland’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (B40), pp. 30–38.
Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., and Rogers, W.L. (1976) The Quality of American Life, New York, Sage.
Clasen, J. and van Oorschot, W. (2002) Changing Principles in European Security, Presentation at the 2nd COST A15 Conference ‘Welfare Reforms for the 21st Century’, Oslo, April 5–6, 2002.
Daatland, S.O. and Motel-Klingebiel, A. (2007) ‘Separating the local and the general in cross-cultural aging research’ in H.-W. Wahl, C. Tesch-Römer, and A. Hoff (eds) New Dynamics in Old Age: Individual, Environmental and Societal Perspectives, Amityville, NY, Baywood, pp. 343–359.
Daatland, S.O., Herlofson, K., and Motel-Klingebiel, A. (2002) ‘Methoden und Perspektiven international vergleichender Alter(n) sforschung (Perspectives on comparative research on ageing in Europe)’ in A. Motel-Klingebiel and U. Kelle (eds) Perspektiven der empirischen Alter(n) ssoziologie, Opladen, Leske and Budrich, pp. 221–248.
Diener, E. (2000) ‘Subjective well-being’, American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.
Diener, E. and Suh, E.M. (1998) ‘Age and subjective well-being: an international analysis’ in K.W. Schaie and L.M. Powell (eds) Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Vol. 17: Focus on Emotion and Adult Development, New York, Springer, pp. 304–324.
Diener, E. and Suh, E.M. (1999) ‘National Differences in Subjective Well-being’ in D. Kahnemann, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz (eds) Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, New York, Sage, pp. 434–450.
Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., and Smith, H.L. (1999) ‘Subjective Well-being: Three Decades of Progress’, Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.
Easterlin, R.A. (1987) ‘The New Age Structure of Poverty in America: Permanent or Transient?’, Population and Development Review, 13, 195–208.
Erikson, R. (1974) ‘Welfare as a planning goal’, Acta Sociologica, 17, 273–278.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Estes, C.L., Linkins, K.W., and Binney, E.A. (1996) ‘The Political Economy of Aging’ in R.H. Binstock and L.K. George (eds) Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, San Diego, CA, Academic Press, pp. 346–361.
Fahey, T. and Smyth, E. (2004) ‘Do Subjective Indicators Measure Welfare?’, European Societies, 6, 5–27.
Fahrmeir, L., Hamerle, A., and Tutz, G. (eds) (1996) Multivariate statistische Verfahren, Berlin, de Gruyter.
Farkas, G. (2003), ‘Human Capital and the Long-Term Effects of Education on Late-Life Inequality’ in S. Crystal and D. Shea (eds) Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, New York, Springer, pp. 138–154.
Filipp, S.-H. (2002) ‘Gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität alter und hochbetagter Frauen und Männer’ in Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen (ed.), Expertisen zum vierten Altenbericht der Bundesregierung, Band I, Das hohe Alter – Konzepte, Forschungsfelder, Lebensqualität, Hannover, Vincentz, 315–414.
Gujarati, D.N. (1995) Basic Econometrics, New York, McGraw-Hill.
Hauser, R.M. and Willis. R.J. (2005) ‘Survey Design and Methodology in the Health and Retirement Study and the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study’ in L.J. Waite (ed.) Aging, Health and Public Policy: Demographic and Economic Perspectives, New York, Population Council, pp. 209–235.
Hradil, S. (2004) Die Sozialstruktur Deutschlands im internationalen Vergleich, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaft.
Kelle, U. and Erzberger, C. (1999) ‘Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden. Methodologische Modelle und ihre Bedeutung für die Forschungspraxis’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 51, 509–531.
Kluge, S. and Kelle, U. (eds) (2001) Methodeninnovation in der Lebenslaufforschung. Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Verfahren in der Lebenslauf-und Biographieforschung, Weinheim, Juventa.
Kohli, M. (1985) ‘Die Institutionalisierung des Lebenslaufs – Historische Befunde und theoretische Argumente’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 37, 1–29.
Kreckel, R. (1992) Politische Soziologie der sozialen Ungleichheit, Frankfurt/M., New York, Campus.
Kühn, K. and Porst, R. (1999) Befragung alter und sehr alter Menschen: Besonderheiten, Schwierigkeiten und methodische Konsequenzen. Ein Literaturbericht. ZUMA Arbeitsbericht 99/03, Mannheim, Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen.
Künemund, H. (2000) ‘Datengrundlage und Methoden’ in M. Kohli and H. Künemund (eds) Die zweite Lebenshälfte – Gesellschaftliche Lage und Partizipation im Spiegel des Alters-Survey, Opladen, Leske and Budrich, pp. 33–40.
Lindenberger, U., Gilberg, R., Pötter, U., Little, T.D., and Baltes, P.B. (1996) ‘Stichprobenselektivität und Generalisierbarkeit der Ergebnisse in der Berliner Altersstudie’ in K.U. Mayer and P.B. Baltes (eds) Die Berliner Altersstudie, Berlin, Akademie Verlag, pp. 85–108.
Lowenstein, A. and Ogg, J. (eds) (2003) OASIS – Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity. Final Report (http://www.dza.de/forschung/oasis_report.pdf. Haifa: University of Haifa).
Lowenstein, A., Katz, R., Mehlhausen-Hassoen, D., and Prilutzky, D. (2002) The Research Instruments in the OASIS Project – Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity, Haifa, The Center for Research and Study of Aging – The Faculty for Welfare and Health Studies, University of Haifa.
Motel-Klingebiel, A. (2004) ‘Quality of Life and Social Inequality in Old Age’ in S.O. Daatland and S. Biggs (eds) Ageing and Diversity. Multiple Pathways in Later Life, Bristol, Policy Press, pp. 189–205.
Motel-Klingebiel, A. and Gilberg, R. (2002) ‘Zielsetzungen, Perspektiven und Probleme bei Surveybefragungen mit alten Menschen’ in A. Motel-Klingebiel and U. Kelle (eds), Perspektiven der empirischen Alter(n)ssoziologie, Opladen, Leske and Budrich, pp. 133–153.
Motel-Klingebiel, A., Hoff, A., Christmann, S., and Hämel, K. (2003) Altersstudien und Studien mit alter(n) swissenschaftlichem Analysepotential. Eine vergleichende Kurzübersicht. Diskussionspapiere, Nr. 39, Berlin, Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen.
Motel-Klingebiel, A., Tesch-Römer, C., and von Kondratowitz, H.-J. (2003a) ‘The Role of Family for Quality of Life in Old Age – A Comparative Perspective’ in V.L. Bengtson and A. Lowenstein (eds) Global Aging and Challenges to Families, New York, de Gruyter, pp. 323–354.
Motel-Klingebiel, A., Tesch-Römer, C., and von Kondratowitz, H.-J. (2003b) ‘The Quantitative Survey’ in A. Lowenstein and J. Ogg (eds) OASIS – Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity. Final Report, Haifa, Haifa University, pp. 63–101 (http://www.dza.de/forschung/oasis_report.pdf).
Motel-Klingebiel, A., Tesch-Römer, C., and von Kondratowitz, H.-J. (2005) ‘Welfare States Do Not Crowd Out the Family: Evidence for Mixed Responsibility from Comparative Analyses’, Ageing and Society, 25, 863–882.
Noll, H.-H. (1999) Konzepte der Wohlfahrtsentwicklung: Lebensqualität und “neue” Wohlfahrtskonzepte. Project “Towards a European System of Social Reporting and Welfare Measurement”, Subproject “European System of Social Indicators”, EuReporting Working Paper No. 3, Mannheim, ZUMA.
Noll, H.-H. and Schöb, A. (2002) ‘Lebenqualität im Alter’ in Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen (eds) Das hohe Alter – Konzepte, Forschungsfelder, Lebensqualität. Expertisen zum Vierten Altenbericht der Bundesregierung, Band 1, Hannover, Vincentz, pp. 229–313.
Phillips, J. and Ray, M. (2003) ‘The Qualitative Phase’ in A. Lowenstein and J. Ogg (eds) OASIS – Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity, Final Report, Haifa, Haifa University, pp. 103–126.
Preston, S.H. (1984) ‘Children and the Elderly – Divergent Paths for America's Dependents’, Demography, 21, 435–357.
Price, D. and Ginn, J. (2003) ‘Sharing the Crust. Gender, Partnership Status and Inequalities in Pension Accumulation’ in S. Arber, K. Davidson, and J. Ginn (eds) Gender and Ageing, Maidenhead, UK, Open University Press, pp. 127–147.
Schmähl, W. (2004) “Generationengerechtigkeit” als Begründung für eine Strategie “nachhaltiger” Alterssicherung in Deutschland, Bremen, Zentrum für Sozialpolitik.
Sen, A.K. (1973) On Economic Inequality, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Smith, J., Fleeson, W., Geiselmann, B., Settersten, R., and Kunzmann, U. (1996) ‘Wohlbefinden im hohen Alter: Vorhersagen aufgrund objektiver Lebensbedingungen und subjektiver Bewertung’ in P.B. Baltes (ed.) Die Berliner Altersstudie, Berlin, Akademie Verlag, pp. 497–523.
Smith, J., Fleeson, W., Geiselmann, B., Settersten, R., and Kunzmann, U. (1999) ‘Sources of Well-being in Very Old Age’ in K.U. Mayer and P.B. Baltes (eds) The Berlin Aging Study Aging from 70 to 100, A research project of the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences, Berlin, Akademie Verlag, pp. 450–471.
Tesch-Roemer, C. and Motel-Klingebiel, A. (2004) ‘Gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen des demographischen Wandels’ in A. Kruse and M. Martin (eds) Enzyklopädie der Gerontologie, Bern, Hans Huber, pp. 561–575.
Tesch-Roemer, C., Motel-Klingebiel, A., and von Kondratowitz, H.-J. (2003) ‘Quality of Life’ in A. Lowenstein and J. Ogg (eds) OASIS – Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity. Final Report, Haifa, Haifa University, pp. 259–284 (http://www.dza.de/forschung/oasis_report.pdf).
Tesch-Römer, C., von Kondratowitz, H.-J., Motel-Klingebiel, A., and Spangler, D. (2000) OASIS – Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity. Erhebungsdesign und Instrumente des deutschen Survey. Diskussionspapiere Nr. 32. Berlin, Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen.
Titmuss, R.M. (1963) Essays on ‘the Welfare State’, London, Unwin University Books.
Titmuss, R.M. (ed.) (1987) The Philosophy of Welfare. Selected Writings of Richard Titmuss, London, Allen & Unwin.
WHOQoL Group (1994) ‘Development of the WHOQOL: Rationales and Current Status’, International Journal of Mental Health, 23, 24–56.
WHOQoL Group (1998) ‘Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-Bref Quality of Life Assessment’, in Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.
World Health Organization (1996) WHOQOL-Bref – Introduction, Administration, Scoring and Generic Version of the Assessment, Field Trial Version, December 1996, Genf, World Health Organization–Programme on Mental Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Motel-Klingebiel, A. (2007). Quality of Life in Old Age, Inequality and Welfare State Reform: A Comparison Between Norway, Germany, and England. In: Mollenkopf, H., Walker, A. (eds) Quality of Life in Old Age. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5682-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5682-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5681-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5682-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)