Abstract
The ELSA laboratory is equipped with a large reaction-wall facility and has acquired its best expertise on the development and implementation of innovative experimental techniques mainly related to testing large-scale specimens by means of the pseudodynamic method. Apart from the relevant achievements within the testing techniques, such as the continuous pseudodynamic test and the development of effective techniques for the assessment of the experimental errors, the role of a reference laboratory in Europe has allowed ELSA to rely on the collaboration of many important research institutions that have contributed through the projects with and added maximum scientific value to the results of the tests. An example of pioneering tests performed for a relevant collaborative project are represented by the bi-directional tests performed on a multi-storey building, where the combination of sophisticated techniques have allowed for the first time to obtain most valuable information on the seismic experimental response of a torsionally unbalanced existing building in its original and retrofitted configurations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
De Luca, A., Mele, E., Molina, F. J., Verzeletti, G., Pinto, A. V., 2001, Base isolation for retrofitting historic buildings: evaluation of seismic performance through experimental investigation, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 30:1125–1145.
Donea J., Magonette G., Negro P., Pegon P., Pinto A., 1996, Verzeletti, G. Pseudodynamic capabilities of the ELSA laboratory for earthquake testing of large structures. Earthquake Spectra, 12:163–180.
Magonette, G., Pegon, P., Molina, F. J., Buchet, Ph., 1998, Development of fast continuous substructuring tests, Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Structural Control.
Magonette, G., F. Marazzi, H. Försterling, 2003, Active control of cable-stayed bridges: large scale mock-up experimental analysis, ISEC-02 - Second International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, Rome.
Maia, N. M. M. and Silva, J. M. M. (editors), 1997, Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis, Research Studies Press, John Wiley.
Mola, E., Negro, P., Pinto, A. V., 2004, Evaluation of current approaches to the analysis and design of multi-storey torsionally unbalanced frames, Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Paper N. 3304.
Molina, F. J., Pegon, P. and Verzeletti, G. 1999a, Time-domain identification from seismic pseudodynamic test results on civil engineering specimens, 2nd International Conference on Identification in Engineering Systems, University of Wales Swansea.
Molina, F. J., Verzeletti, G., Magonette, G., Buchet, Ph., Geradin, M., 1999b, Bi-directional pseudodynamic test of a full-size three-storey building, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 28:1541–1566.
Molina, F. J., Gonzalez, M. P., Pegon, P., Varum H. and Pinto, A., 2000. Frequency and Damping Evolution During Experimental Seismic Response of Civil Engineering Structures. COST F3 Conference on System Identification & Structural Health Monitoring.
Molina, F. J., Magonette, G., Pegon, P., 2002a, Assessment of systematic experimental errors in pseudodynamic tests, Proc. of 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Elsevier Science, Paper 525.
Molina F. J., Verzeletti, G., Magonette, G., Buchet, Ph., Renda, V., Geradin, M., Parducci, A, Mezzi, M, Pacchiarotti, A, Federici, L., Mascelloni, S., 2002b, Pseudodynamic tests on rubber base isolators with numerical substructuring of the superstructure and strain-rate effect compensation, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31:1563–1582.
Molina, F. J., S. Sorace, G. Terenzi, G. Magonette, B. Viaccoz, 2004, Seismic tests on reinforced concrete and steel frames retrofitted with dissipative braces, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 33:1373–1394.
Negro, P., Mola, E., 2005, Full scale PsD testing of the torsionally unbalanced SPEAR structure in the ‘as-built’ and retrofitted configurations, SPEAR Workshop, EC-JRC Ispra, Italy. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation; http://www.nees.org.
Phillips, C. L. and Harbor, R. D., 1999, Feedback Control Systems, Prentice Hall.
Pinto, A. V., Pegon, P., Magonette, G., Tsionis, G., 2004, Pseudo-dynamic testing of bridges using non-linear substructuring, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 33:1125–1146.
Pinto, A. V., Pegon, P., Taucer, F., 2006, Shaking table facilities and testing for advancement of earthquake engineering: international cooperation, experiences, values, chances, First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology.
Shing, P. B., Mahin, S. A., 1987, Cumulative experimental errors in pseudo-dynamic tests, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 15:409–424.
Takanashi, K., Nakashima, M., 1986, A State of the Art: Japanese Activities on on-Line Computer Test Control Method, Report of the Institute of Industrial Science, 32, 3, University of Tokyo.
Thewalt, C. and Roman, M., 1994, Performance Parameters for Pseudodynamic Tests, ASCE Journal of Struct. Eng., 120, 9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Molina, F.J. (2007). EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH AT JRC-ELSA. In: Ibrahimbegovic, A., Kozar, I. (eds) Extreme Man-Made and Natural Hazards in Dynamics of Structures. NATO Security through Science Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5656-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5656-7_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5654-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5656-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)