Advertisement

COMPUTATIONAL ISSUES IN THE SIMULATION OF BLAST AND IMPACT PROBLEMS: AN INDUSTRIAL PERSPECTIVE

  • D. R. J. Owen
  • Y. T. Feng
  • M. G. Cottrell
  • J. Yu
Part of the NATO Security through Science Series book series

Abstract

Computational strategies involved in the numerical simulation of large scale industrial problems, characterised by a transition from a continuous to a discontinuous state, are reviewed in the present work. Particular attention is focused on the numerical modelling of the progressive damage that precedes crack initiation for both brittle/ductile materials and the introduction of discrete fractures within an initially continuum formulation. For problems restricted to relatively small deformations, the use of continuum based methods may be suitable, but for situations involving large geometric changes with possible post-fracture particle flow, there are compelling advantages in employing combined finite/discrete element solution strategies. The need for rigorous consideration of both theoretical and algorithmic issues is emphasised, particularly in relation to the computational treatment of finite strain elasto-plastic (viscoplastic) deformation and element technology capable of dealing with plastic incompressibility. Other important aspects such as adaptive mesh refinement strategies are discussed and procedures are presented for undertaking the transition from continuously distributed fracture states to discrete crack systems, followed by post-failure modelling. The practical application of the above methodology is illustrated in the numerical solution of industrially relevant problems.

Keywords

Inelastic Strain Discrete Element Modelling Impact Problem Discontinuous Deformation Analysis Crack Band 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrade Pires, F. M., De Souza Neto, E. A., and Owen, D. R. J. (2004) On the Finite Element Prediction of Damage Growth and Fracture Initiation In Finitely Deforming Ductile Materials.Google Scholar
  2. Belytschko, T., Ong, J., Liu, W., and Kennedy, J. (1984) Hourglass Control in Linear and Non Linear Problems, Comp. Meth. App. Mech. Engng. 43, 251–276.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonet, J. and Burton, A. (1998) A Simple Average Nodal Pressure Tetrahedral Element for Incompressible and Nearly Incompressible Dynamic Explicit Applications, Comm. Num. Meth. Engng. 14, 437–449.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonet, J., Marriot, J., and Hassan, O. (2001) An Average Nodal Deformation Gradient Linear Tetrahedral Element For Large Strain Explicit Dynamic Applications, Comm. Num. Meth. Engng. 17, 551–561.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cope, R., Rao, P., Clark, L., and Norris, P. (1980) Modelling of reinforced concrete behaviour for finite element analysis of bridge slabs, In Numerical Methods For Nonlinear Problems, pp. 457–470, Pineridge Press, Swansea.Google Scholar
  6. Cottrell, M. G. (2002) The Development of Rational Computational Strategies for the Numerical Modelling of High Velocity Impact, Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea.Google Scholar
  7. Cundall, P. A. and Strack, O. D. L. (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies, Géotechnique 29, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Borst, R. (2001) Some recent issues in computational failure mechanics, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng. 52, 63–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Souza Neto, E., Andrade Pires, F., and Owen, D. R. J. (2003) A New F-bar Based Method For Linear Triangles and Tetrahedra in The Finite Element Analysis of Nearly Incompressible Solids, In E. Onate and D. R. J. Owen (eds.), Computational Plasticity: Fundamentals and Applications, Vol. 7, Barcelona, Spain, CIMNE.Google Scholar
  10. De Souza Neto, E., Andrade Pires, F., and Owen, D. R. J. (2005) F-bar-based linear triangles and tetrahedra for finite strain analysis of nearly incompressible solids. Part I: Formulation and benchmarking, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng. 62, 353–383.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dolbow, J., Moes, N., and Belytschko, T. (2001) An extended finite element method for modelling crack growth with frictional contact, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 190, 6825–6846.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Feng, Y. T., Han, K., and Owen, D. R. J. (2005) An energy based polyhedron-to-polyhedron contact model, In 3rd M.I.T. Conference of Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, MIT, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Feng, Y. T. and Owen, D. R. J. (2002) An augmented spatial digital tree algorithm for contact detection in computational mechanics, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng. 55, 556–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feng, Y. T. and Owen, D. R. J. (2004) A 2D polygon/polygon contact model: algorithmic aspects, Engineering Computations 21, 265–277.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldsmith, W. (1999) Review: Non-ideal projectile impact on targets, Int. J. Imp. Engng. 22, 95–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grady, D. E. and Hollenbach, R. E. (1977) Rate-controlling Mechanisms in Brittle Failure of Rock, Technical Report SAND 76-0559, University of Higher Education, Sandia Laboratories.Google Scholar
  17. Haimson, B. and Song, I. (1993) Laboratory study of borehole breakouts in cordova cream: a case of shear failure mechanism, Int. J. Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. 30, 1047–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Han, K. (2004) Algorithmic and Modelling Aspects of Discrete Element Methods With Applications to Shot Peening and Peen Forming Processes, Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea.Google Scholar
  19. Holmquist, T. J. and Johnson, G. R. (2002) Response of silicon carbide to high velocity impact, Int. J. Applied Physics 91, 5858–5866.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, G. and Cook, W. (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures, In 7th International Symposium On Ballistics, The Hague, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  21. Klerck, P. A. (2000) The Finite Element Modelling of Discrete Fracture in Quasi-Brittle Materials, Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea.Google Scholar
  22. Klerck, P. A., Sellers, E. J., and Owen, D. R. J. (2004) Discrete fracture in quasi-brittle materials under compressive and tensile stress states, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 193, 3035–3056.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, M. and Haimson, B. (1993) Laboratory study of borehole breakouts in Lac du Bonnet granite: a case of extensile failure mechanism, Int. J. Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr. 30, 1039–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lundberg, P. (2004) Interface defeat and penetration: two modes of interaction between metallic projectiles and ceramic targets, Comprehensive summaries of Uppsala dissertations for the faculty of science and technology.Google Scholar
  25. May, I. M., Chen, Y., Owen, D. R. J., Feng, Y. T., and Bere, A. (2005) Behaviour of reinforced concrete beams and slabs under drop-weight impact loads, In 5th Asia-Pacific Conf. on SHOCK and IMPACT LOADS ON STRUCTURES, Perth, Western Australia.Google Scholar
  26. Morançay, L., Homsi, H., and Roelandt, J. (1997) Application of Remeshing Techniques to the Simulation of Metal Cutting by Punching, In E. Onate, D. R. J. Owen, and E. Hinton (eds.), Computational Plasticity: Theory and Applications, CIMNE, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  27. Ortiz, M. and Quigley IV, J. (1991) Adaptive Mesh Refinement in Strain Localization Problems, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 90, 781–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Owen, D. R. J., Feng, Y. T., Neto, E. D., Wang, F., Cottrell, M. G., and Yu, J. (2004) The modelling of multi-fracturing solids and particulate media., Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng. 60, 317–340.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Owen, D. R. J., Feng, Y. T., Yu, J., and Perić, D. (2001) Finite/discrete element analysis of multifracture and multi-contact phenomena, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1981, 484–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Owen, D. R. J., Perić, D., Crook, A. J. L., De Souza Neto, E., Yu, J., and Dutko, M. (1995) Advanced Computational Strategies for 3-D Large Scale Metal Forming Simulations, In S.-F. Shen and P. Dawson (eds.), Fifth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, Ithaca, New York, Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  31. Perić, D. and Owen, D. R. J. (1998) Finite element applications to the nonlinear mechanics of solids, Reports on Progress in Physics 161, 1495–1574.ADSGoogle Scholar
  32. Perić, D. and Owen, D. R. J. (2004) Computational modelling of forming processes, In E. Stein, R. de Borst, and T. J. R. Hughes (eds.), Encyclopeadia of Computational Mechanics, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  33. Perić, D., Yu, J., and Owen, D. R. J. (1994) On Error Estimates and Adaptivity in Elastoplastic Solids: Application to the Numerical Simulation of Localization in Classical and Cosserat Continua, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 37, 1351–1379.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Ravi-Chandar, K. and Knauss, W. (1984a) An Experimental investigation into dynamic fracture – Part I. Crack Initiation and Arrest, Int. J. Fract. 25, 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ravi-Chandar, K. and Knauss, W. (1984b) An Experimental investigation into dynamic fracture – Part II.Microstructural Aspects, Int. J. Fract. 26, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Riou, P., Denoul, C., and Cottenot, C. (1998) Visualisation of the damage evolution in impacted silicon carbide ceramics, Int. J. Imp. Engng. 21, 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruiz, G., Pandolfi, A., and Oritz, M. (2001) Three-dimensional cohesive modelling of dynamic mixed-mode fracture, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng. 52, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schweizerhof, K., Nilsson, L., and Hallquist, J. (1992) Crashworthiness Analysis in the Automotive Industry, Int. J. Comp. Appl. Techn. 5, 134–156.Google Scholar
  39. Shi, G. (1988) Discontinuous deformation analysis: a new method for computing stress, strain and sliding of block systems, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  40. Taylor, R. (2000) A Mixed-Enhanced Formulation for Tetrahedral Finite Elements, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 47, 205–227.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Westerling, L., Lundberg, P., and Lundberg, B. (2001) Tungsten long-rod penetration into confined cylinders of boron carbide at and above ordnance velocities, Int. J. Imp. Engng. 25, 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yu., J. (1999) A Contact Interaction Framework for Numerical Simulation of Multi-Body Problems and Aspects of Damage and Fracture for Brittle Materials, Ph.D. thesis, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea.Google Scholar
  43. Zienkiewicz, O., Rojek, J., Taylor, R., and Pastor, M. (1998) Triangles and Tetrahedra in Explicit Dynamic Codes for Solids, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 43, 565–583.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  44. Zienkiewicz, O. and Zhu, J. (1987) A Simple Error Estimator and Adaptive Procedure For Practical Engineering Analysis, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 24, 337–357.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  45. Zukas, J. (1990) High Velocity Impact Dynamics, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. R. J. Owen
    • 1
  • Y. T. Feng
    • 1
  • M. G. Cottrell
    • 2
  • J. Yu
    • 2
  1. 1.Civil & Computational Engineering CentreSchool of Engineering University of Wales SwanseaSwanseaU.K.
  2. 2.Rockfield Technology Ltd.SwanseaU.K.

Personalised recommendations