Abstract
Data from a process or system is often monitored in order to detect unusual events and this task is required in many disciplines. A decision rule can be learned to detect anomalies from the normal operating environment when neither the normal operations nor the anomalies to be detected are pre-specified. This is accomplished through artificial data that transforms the problem to one of supervised learning. However, when a large collection of variables are monitored, not all react to the anomaly detected by the decision rule. It is important to interrogate a signal to determine the variables that are most relevant to or most contribute to the signal in order to improve and facilitate the actions to signal. Metrics are presented that can be used determine contributors to a signal developed through an artificial contrast that are conceptually simple. The metrics are shown to be related to traditional tools for normally distributed data and their efficacy is shown on simulated and actual data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alt, F. B. (1985). Multivariate quality control. In Kotz, S., Johnson, N. L., and Read, C. R., editors, Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, pages 110–122. JohnWiley and Sons, New York.
Chua, M. and Montgomery, D. C. (1992). Investigation and characterization of a control scheme for multivariate quality control. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 8:37–44.
Cucker, F. and Smale, S. (2001). On the mathematical foundations of learning. Bulletin of AMS, 39:1–49.
Doganaksay, N., Faltin, F. W., and Tucker, W. T. (1991). Identification of out-of-control quality characteristics in a multivariate manufacturing environment. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 20:2775–2790.
Hotelling, H. (1947). Multivariate quality controlillustrated by the air testing of sample bombsights. In Eisenhart, C., Hastay, M., and Wallis, W., editors, Techniques of Statistical Analysis, pages 111–184. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Hwang, W., Runger, G., and Tuv, E. (2004). Multivariate statistical process control with artificial contrasts. under review.
Mason, R. L., Tracy, N. D., and Young, J. C. (1995). Decomposition of T2 for Multivariate Control Chart Interpretation, Journal of Quality Technology, 27:99–108.
Murphy, B. J. (1987). Selecting Out-Of-Control Variables With T2 Multivariate Quality Control Procedures. The Statistician, 36:571–583.
Rencher (1993). The Contribution of Individual Variables to Hotelling’s T2, Wilks’ Λ, and R2 Biometrics, 49:479–489.
Runger, G. C., Alt, F. B., and Montgomery, D. C. (1996). Contributors to a multivariate control chart signal. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 25:2203–2213.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jing, H., George, R., Eugene, T. (2007). Contributors to a Signal from an Artificial Contrast. In: Filipe, J., Ferrier, JL., Cetto, J.A., Carvalho, M. (eds) Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics II. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5626-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5626-0_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5625-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5626-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)