Biotechnical characteristics of root systems of typical Mediterranean species

  • Chiara Mattia
  • Gian Battista Bischetti
  • Francesco Gentile
Conference paper
Part of the Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences book series (DPSS, volume 103)


Vegetation can significantly contribute to stabilise sloping terrain by adding cohesion to soil: this reinforcement depends on the morphological characteristics of the root systems and the tensile strength of single roots. The paper presents the results of research carried out in order to evaluate the biotechnical characteristics of the root system of three typical Mediterranean plant specieswhich can affect slope stability. The species considered in the present study are Lygeum spartum L. (a perennial herbaceous monocotyledonous), Atriplex halimus L. and Pistacia lentiscus L. (two dicotyledonous shrub species). The plant specimens were collected in the Basilicata region (Southern Italy) by in situ excavation to obtain the whole root systems. Single root specimens for each species were sampled and tested for tensile strength measurement and the complete root systems were analysed to evaluate the root density distribution with depth in terms of root area ratio. The resulting data have been used to calculate the reinforcing effect in terms of increased shear strength of the soil using the model of Wu (1976, Investigation of landslides on Prince ofWales Island. Geotech. Eng. Rep. 5 Civil Eng. Dep. Ohio State Univ. Columbus, Ohio, USA) andWaldron (1977, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41(3), 843–849), a simple and widespread model based on the reinforced earth theory. The results show that root reinforcement exerted by L. spartum is stronger than the reinforcement exerted by P. lentiscus and A. halimus in the upper layers of the soil, while P. lentiscus presents higher reinforcement values in deeper horizons. A. halimus presents lower values than either of the other species studied.


Shear Strength Root System Slope Stability Root Diameter Shallow Landslide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abernethy B and Rutherfurd I D 2001 The distribution and strength of riparian tree roots in relation to riverbank reinforcement. Hydrol. Processes 15, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bischetti G B, Bonfanti F and Greppi M 2003 Root tensile strength measurement: testing device and protocol Quad. Idron. Mont. 21(1), 349–360 (in Italian).Google Scholar
  3. Bischetti G B, Chiaradia E T, Simonato T, Speziali B, Vitali B, Vullo P and Zocco A 2005 Root strength and root area ratio of forest species in Lombardy (Northern Italy). Plant Soil 278, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Böhm W 1979 Methods of Studying Root Systems. Ecological Series no. 33. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. Burroughs E R and Thomas B R 1977 Declining root strength in Douglas-Fir after felling as a factor in slope stability. Res. Paper INT-190, Interm. Forest and Range Exp. Station, USFS, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Cheng H, Yang X, Liu A, Fu H and Wan M 2003 A study on the performance and mechanism of soil-reinforcement by herb root system. In Proceedings of the Third International Vetiver Conference, Guangzhou, China, October 6–9 2003, pp. 384–390.Google Scholar
  7. Corbetta F, Ubaldi D and Zanotti A L 1992 The Lygeum spartum vegetation in the badlands of Basento Valley (Basilicata Region). Arch. Bot. Ital. 67(3/4), 141–155 (in Italian).Google Scholar
  8. Gallotta A, Gentile F, Puglisi S and Romano G 2003 Preliminary results of a research on mechanical resistance of root systems in hillslope stability in the Mediterranean environment. Quad. Idron. Mont. 21(1), 337–348 (in Italian).Google Scholar
  9. Gray D H and Sotir R B 1996 Biotechnical and Soil Bioengineering Slope Stabilization: A Practical Guide for Erosion Control. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  10. Greenway D R 1987 Vegetation and slope stability. In MG Anderson and KS Richards (eds.), Slope Stability Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Hammond C, Hall D, Miller S and Swetik P 1992 Level I stability analysis (LISA) documentation for version 2.0, General Technical Report INT-285, USDA Forest Service Interm. Res. Station.Google Scholar
  12. Köstler J N, Bruckner E and Bibelriether H 1968 Die Wurzeln der Waldbäume. Verl. Parey, Berlin (in Italian).Google Scholar
  13. Mattia C 2003 Caratteristiche biotecniche degli apparati radicali di specie tipiche dell’ambiente mediterraneo. Ph.D. thesis, Agricultural University of Bari, Italy.Google Scholar
  14. Megahan W F and Kidd W J 1972 Effect of logging and logging roads on erosion and sediment deposition from steep terrain. J. Forest. 70, 136–141.Google Scholar
  15. Nilaweera N S 1994 Effects of tree roots on slope stability: the case of Khao Luang Mountain area, So Thailand. Dissertation. No. Gt-93-2.Google Scholar
  16. O’Loughlin C L 1974 The effects of timber removal on the stability of forest soils. J. Hydrol. (N.Z.) 13, 121–134.Google Scholar
  17. Roering J J, Schmidt K M, Stock J D, Dietrich W E and Montgomery D R 2003 Shallow landsliding, root reinforcement, and the spatial distribution of trees in the Oregon Coast Range. Can. Geotech. J. 40, 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schiechtl H M 1980 Bioengineering for Land Reclamation and Conservation. University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
  19. Schmid I and Kazda M 2001 Vertical distribution and radial growth of coarse roots in pure and mixed stands of Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies. Can. J. Forest Res. 31, 539–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmid I and Kazda M 2002 Root distribution of Norway spruce in monospecific and mixed stands on different soils. For. Ecol. Manage. 159, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schmidt K M, Roering J J, Stock J D, Dietrich W E, Montgomery D R and Schaub T 2001 The variability of root cohesion as an influence on shallow landslide susceptibility in the Oregon Coast Range. Can. Geotech. J. 38, 995–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shields F D and Gray D H 1993 Effects of woody vegetation on the structural integrity of sandy levees. Water Resour. Bull. 28(5), 917–931.Google Scholar
  23. Sidle R C 1992 A theoretical model of the effects of timber harvesting on slope stability. Water Resour. Res. 28, 1897–1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sidle R C, Pearce A J and O’Loughlin C L 1985 Hillslope Stability and Land Use. AGU Water Resources Monography, 11, Washington D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  25. Stokes A 1999 Strain distribution during anchorage failure of Pinus pinaster Ait. at different age and tree growth response to wind-induced root movement. Plant Soil 217, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tobias S 1994 Shear Strength of the Soil Root Bond System. Proceedings of the International Conference on Vegetation and Slope: Stabilization, Protection and Ecology. Inst. Civil Engineers Uni. Museum Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
  27. Tsukamoto Y 1987 Evaluation of the effect of tree roots on slope stability. Bull. Exp. Forest Tokyo Univ. Agr. Tech. 23, 65–124.Google Scholar
  28. Waldron L J 1977 The shear resistance of root permeated homogeneous stratified soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41(3), 843–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Waldron L J and Dakessian S 1981 Soil reinforcement by root: calculation of increased soil shear resistance from root properties. Soil Sci. 132, 427–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu T H 1976 Investigation of Landslides on Prince of Wales Island. Geotech. Eng. Rep. 5 Civil Eng. Dep. Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  31. Wu T H, McKinell W P and Swanston D N 1979 Strength of tree roots, landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. Can. Geotech. J. 16(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu T H and Sidle R C 1995 A distributed slope stability model for steep forested basins. Water Resour. Res. 31, 2097–2110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhou Y, Watts D, Li Y and Cheng X 1998 A case study of effect of lateral roots of Pinus yunnanensis on shallow soil reinforcement. For. Ecol. Manage. 103, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ziemer R R and Swanston D N 1977 Root strength changes after logging in southeast Alaska. USDA Forest Serv. Res. Note PNW 306.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiara Mattia
    • 1
  • Gian Battista Bischetti
    • 2
    • 3
  • Francesco Gentile
    • 1
  1. 1.Department PROGESAUniversita di BariBariItaly
  2. 2.Institute of Agricultural HydraulicsUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanoItaly
  3. 3.Istituto di Idraulica AgrariaUniversità degli Studi di MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations