Novel biomechanical analysis of plant roots

  • O. Hamza
  • A.G. Bengough
  • M.F. Bransby
  • M.C.R. Davies
  • C. Halpin
  • P.D. Hallett
Part of the Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences book series (DPSS, volume 103)

Abstract

The mechanical behaviour of individual roots and their interaction with soil controls plant anchorage and slope stabilisation, and this is controlled by plant genotype. Tensile tests were performed on roots of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum ‘Samsun’) plants with lignin biosynthesis pathways affected by down-regulating cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) enzyme production. Altering this pathway resulted in root stiffness <50% of the unmodified control, although failure stress was not different. Like most biological tissues, the roots had non-linear mechanical behaviour, were irregular in shape, and heterogeneous. Particle image velocimetry (PIV), applied for the first time to the tensile testing of materials, identified the localised strain fields that developed in roots under tension. PIV uses a cross correlation technique to measure localised displacements on the surface of the root between sequential digital images taken at successive strain intervals during tensile loading. Further analysis of root sections showed that non-linear mechanical behaviour is affected by cellular rupture, with a clear step-wise rupture from cortex to stele in some younger roots. This will affect slip planes that develop under pull-out at the root–soil interface. By assessing localised axial and radial strain along a root section with PIV, we have been able to determine the true stress that controls ultimate failure and the true stress–strain behaviour along the root length. The techniques used have clear potential to enhance our understanding of mechanical interactions at the root–soil interface.

Keywords

Maize Lignin Rubber Cane Cross Correlation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adrian R J 1991 Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 261–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashby M F and Jones D R H 1996 Engineering Materials 1—An Introduction to their Properties and Applications. 2nd edition. Butterworth Heineman, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey P H J, Currey J D and Fitter A H 2002 The role of root system architecture and root hairs in promoting anchorage against uprooting forces in Allium cepa and root mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baucher M, Halpin C, Petit-Conil M and Boerjan W 2003 Lignin: genetic engineering and impact on pulping. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38, 305–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry P M, Spink J H, Gay A P and Craigon J 2003 A comparison of root and stem lodging risks among winter wheat cultivars. J. Agr. Sci. 141, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bridle R J and Davies M C R 1997 Analysis of soil nailing using tension and shear: experimental observations and assessment. P. I. Civil Eng.-Geotec. 125, 155–167.Google Scholar
  7. Chabannes M, Barakate A, Lapierre C, Marita J M, Ralph J, Pean M, Danoun S, Halpin C, Grima-Pettenati J and Boudet A M 2001a Strong decrease in lignin content without significant alteration of plant development is induced by simultaneous down-regulation of cinnamoyl CoA reductase (CCR) and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) in tobacco plants. Plant J. 28, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chabannes M, Ruel K, Yoshinaga A, Chabbert B, Jauneau A, Joseleau J P and Boudet A M 2001b In situ analysis of lignins in transgenic tobacco reveals a differential impact of individual transformations on the spatial patterns of lignin deposition at the cellular and subcellular levels. Plant J. 28, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crook M J and Ennos A R 1994 Stem and root characteristics associated with lodging resistance in 4 winter-wheat cultivars. J. Agr. Sci. 123, 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crook M J and Ennos A R 1998 The increase in anchorage with tree size of the tropical tap rooted tree Mallotus wrayi, King (Euphorbiaceae). Ann. Bot. (London) 82, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Czarnes S, Hallett P D, Bengough A G and Young I M 2000 Root- and microbial-derived mucilages affect soil structure and water transport. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 51, 435–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Easson D L, Pickles S J and White E M 1995 A study of the tensile force required to pull wheat roots from soil. Ann. Appl. Biol. 127, 363–373.Google Scholar
  13. Ekanayake J C and Phillips C J 1999 A method for stability analysis of vegetated hillslopes: an energy approach. Can. Geotech. J. 36, 1172–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ennos A R 1991 The mechanics of anchorage in wheat Triticum-aestivum L .1. The anchorage of wheat seedlings. J. Exp. Bot. 42, 1601–1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ennos A R, Crook M J and Grimshaw C 1993a A comparitive study of the anchorage systems of Himalayan Balsam Impatiens glandulifera and mature sunflower Helianthus annus. J. Exp. Bot. 44, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ennos A R, Crook M J and Grimshaw C 1993b The anchorage mechanics of maize, Zea-mays. J. Exp. Bot. 44, 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodman A M, Crook M J and Ennos A R 2001 Anchorage mechanics of the tap root system of winter-sown oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Ann. Bot. (London) 87, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halpin C 2004 Investigating and manipulating lignin biosynthesis in the postgenomic era. Adv. Bot. Res. 41, 63–106.Google Scholar
  19. Halpin C and Boerjan W 2003 Stacking transgenes in forest trees. Trends Plant Sci. 8, 363–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halpin C, Knight M E, Foxon G A, Campbell M M, Boudet A M, Boon J J, Chabbert B, Tollier M T and Schuch W 1994 Manipulation of lignin quality by down-regulation of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase. Plant J. 6, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamza O, Bengough A G, Bransby M F, Davies M C R and Hallett P D 1996 Biomechanics of plant roots: estimating localised deformation with particle image velocimetry. Biosystems Eng. 94, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hepworth D G and Vincent J F V 1998 The mechanical properties of xylem tissue from tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum ‘Samsun’). Ann. Bot. (London) 81, 751–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hepworth D G, Vincent J F V 1999 The growth response of the stems of genetically modified tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum ‘Samsun’) to flexural stimulation. Ann. Bot. (London) 83(1), 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCully M E 1999 Roots in soil: Unearthing the complexities of roots and their rhizospheres. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 695–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Niklas K J 1998 Effects of vibration on mechanical properties and biomass allocation pattern of Capsella bursa-pastoris (Cruciferae). Ann. Bot. (London) 82, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Niklas K J 1999 A mechanical perspective on foliage leaf form and function. New Phytol. 143, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pilate G, Guiney E, Holt K, Petit-Conil M, Lapierre C, Leple J C, Pollet B, Mila I, Webster E A, Marstorp H G, Hopkins D W, Jouanin L, Boerjan W, Schuch W, Cornu D and Halpin C 2002 Field and pulping performances of transgenic trees with altered lignification. Nat. Biotechnol. 20(6), 607–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saxena D and Stotzky G 2001 Bt corn has a higher lignin content than non-Bt corn. Am. J. Bot. 88, 1704–1706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stokes A, Ball J, Fitter A H, Brain P and Coutts M P 1996 An experimental investigation of the resistance of model root systems to uprooting. Ann. Bot. (London) 78, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sidle R C and Wu W M 1999 Simulating effects of timber harvesting on the temporal and spatial distribution of shallow landslides. Z. Geomorph. 43, 185–201.Google Scholar
  31. Voytik-Harbin S L, Roeder B A, Sturgis J E, Kokini K and Robinson J P 2003 Simultaneous mechanical loading and confocal reflection microscopy for three-dimensional microbiomechanical analysis of biomaterials and tissue constructs. Microsc. Microanal. 9, 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wahl S and Ryser P 2000 Root tissue structure is linked to ecological strategies of grasses. New Phytol. 148, 459–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Watson A, Phillips C and Marden M 1999 Root strength, growth, and rates of decay: root reinforcement changes of two tree species and their contribution to slope stability. Plant Soil 217, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. White D J, Take W A and Bolton M D 2003 Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry. Géotechnique 53, 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhong R Q, Taylor J J and Ye Z H 1997 Disruption of interfascicular fiber differentiation in an Arabidopsis mutant. Plant Cell 9, 2159–2170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Hamza
    • 1
    • 2
  • A.G. Bengough
    • 2
  • M.F. Bransby
    • 1
  • M.C.R. Davies
    • 1
  • C. Halpin
    • 3
  • P.D. Hallett
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of Civil EngineeringUniversity of DundeeDundeeScotland
  2. 2.Scottish Crop Research InstituteDundeeScotland
  3. 3.College of Life SciencesUniversity of Dundee at SCRIDundeeScotland
  4. 4.Plant-Soil Inteface ProgrammeScottish Crop Research InstituteDundeeUK

Personalised recommendations