Advertisement

Slope stabilisation by perennial ‘gramineae’ in Southern Italy: plant growth and temporal performance

  • D. Cazzuffi
  • A. Corneo
  • E. Crippa
Conference paper
Part of the Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences book series (DPSS, volume 103)

Abstract

In the territory of Altomonte, a village located in Calabria, in the Southern part of Italy, a newthermoelectrical station is under construction. Thiswork involved major earthworkswhich regarded newexcavated slopes. In order to protect soil from erosion due to rainfall and runoff and also in order to prevent superficial soil instability, it was decided to plant four different species of perennial “gramineae” plants (Eragrass, Elygrass, Pangrass and Vetiver) characterised by deep roots. Works began in November 2002 and ended in May 2003, a period marked by very different climate and meteorological conditions, varying from exceptionally rainy and cold winter to warm and dry spring months. The paper describes the different stages of the project and the monitoring programme for the following months. The extension of the work and the use of four different kinds of vegetation made periodic inspections of the entire site appropriate. Two in situ investigations, respectively performed in August 2003 and in November 2003, are outlined. The aim of these surveys was to confirm the success of the work by verifying the growth of the plants and roots. The principal monitored parameters were the percentage of sprouted plants, the height of the foliage and the depth of roots. The investigations showed good results, keeping in mind the very difficult climatic conditions and the extreme poor fertility of the topsoil laid down upon the clay layer: in particular, high survival rate were measured over the entire area of the works and the root systems have developed sufficiently to grow through the upper topsoil layer (0.2–0.3 m) into the underlying clay layer. In March 2004, a sampling programme was undertaken on the same site. Direct shear tests were carried out in the laboratory in order to evaluate the increase in shear strength of the rooted soil mass. The research involved the recovery of three undisturbed samples of soil with roots for each of the four types of ‘gramineae’ plants and three undisturbed samples constituted only of soil, from the surface to a depth of 1.0 m. The tests were performed in a large direct shear apparatus on 200 mm diameter samples. The test results allowed to evaluate the roots’ contribution of the different gramineous species and to underline the direct correlation between the increase in soil shear strength and the root tensile strengths. In particular, an increase in cohesion ranging between 2 and 15 kPa was recorded, according to the different species: the maximum values of increase in shear strength were reached by Vetiver roots, which are also characterised by the highest tensile strength.

Keywords

Shear Strength Panicum Virgatum Direct Shear Test Clayey Silt Undisturbed Sample 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bache D H and MacAskill I A 1984 Vegetation in Civil and Landscape Engineering. Granada, London, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Belfiore G and Urciuoli G 2004 Analisi del contributo meccanico delle radici alla resistenza del terreno (Interpretation of the root mechanical contribution to the soil shear strength). In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Geotechnical Researchers 2004—IARG 2004, Trento, Italy (CD rom in Italian).Google Scholar
  3. Cazzuffi D and Crippa E 2005 Shear strength behaviour of cohesive soils reinforced with vegetation. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Osaka, Japan, pp. 2493–2498.Google Scholar
  4. Cazzuffi D and Tironi F 2003 Contribution of roots to slope stability: an overview of typical results for different plants. In Proceedings of the International Conference “Fast slope movements prediction and prevention for risk mitigation,” Napoli, Italy, Vol. 1, pp. 101–105.Google Scholar
  5. Coppin N J and Richards I G 1990 Use of Vegetation in Civil Engineering. Butterworths, London, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Goldsmith W 1998 Soil reinforcement by river plants: progress results. In Proceedings of the ASCE Conference on wetlands engineering and river restoration, Denver, USA, pp. 301–306.Google Scholar
  7. Gray D H and Sotir R B 1996 Biotechnical and Soil Bioengineering Slope Stabilisation: A Practical Guide for Erosion Control. Wiley, Chichester, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Hengchaovanich D 2003 Vetiver system for slope stabilization. In Proceedings of 3rd International Vetiver Conference, Guangzhou, China, pp. 301–309.Google Scholar
  9. Morgan R P C and Rickson R J 1995 Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control. A Bioengineering Approach. E & FN Spon, London, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Operstein V and Frydman S 2000 The influence of vegetation on soil strength, Ground Improvement 4, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pease M 2000 The European and Mediterranean Vetiver Network. In Proceedings of the Second International Vetiver Conference, Thailand, pp. 185–187.Google Scholar
  12. Schiechtl H M and Stern R 1996 Ground Bioengineering Techniques for Slope Protection and Erosion Control, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Som N, Rao P J and Sanyal T 2001 A Manual on Use of Jute Geotextiles in Civil Engineering. Jute Manufacturers Development Council, Hooghly Printing, Kolkata, India.Google Scholar
  14. Wu T H and Watson A 1998 In situ shear tests of soil blocks with roots, Can. Geotech. J., 35, 579–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu T H, McKinnel W P and Swanston D N 1979 Strength of tree roots and landslides on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska, Can. Geotech. J., 16, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Cazzuffi
    • 1
    • 3
  • A. Corneo
    • 2
  • E. Crippa
    • 1
  1. 1.CESI S.p.A.MilanItaly
  2. 2.Vetivaria s.r.l.MilanItaly
  3. 3.CESI S.p.A.MilanItaly

Personalised recommendations