This chapter systematically describes different forms of knowledge and their roles at the interface of human cognition, communication, and cooperation (CCC triangulation). A distinction between a narrow and a broad sense of knowledge is made. The notion of forms of knowledge is explained as different ways of knowing. It is impossible to individuate contents of knowledge independently of signs and practices of articulation. There is no knowledge without signs. The author focuses on the relation between information and knowledge, following Kant in differentiating between “opinion,” “belief,” and “knowledge.” In epistemological respects the chapter is an attempt to gain a foothold beyond the dichotomy of absolute knowledge and arbitrary relativism. The function of rules in knowledge acquisition and knowledge justification is shown to be particularly important. An object-oriented level is distinguished from a metatheoretical level, and it is shown in what sense second-order rules are embedded in and guaranteed by a world view. Hence, the power of world views, models, and systems of symbols in knowledge acquisition and knowledge dynamics is underlined. The dynamics of knowledge are brought into focus and internally correlated to symbols, time, situation, context, and creativity at the CCC interface. The role of nonpropositional, nonverbal, and implicit/tacit knowledge at the CCC interface is emphasized. The author outlines the internal relation between “knowing how” and “rationality,” stressing that the rationality of knowing how is not algorithmic or calculus-guided; it is of a different type. An outline of a unified theory of knowledge and action is given.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abel, G. (1995). Interpretationswelten. Gegenwartsphilosophie jenseits von Essentialismus und Relativismus [Worlds of interpretation: Contemporary philosophy beyond essentialism and relativism] (2nd ed.). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Abel, G. (1999). Sprache, Zeichen, Interpretation [Language, sign, interpretation]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Abel, G. (2002). Indeterminacy and interpretation. In D. Føllesdal (Ed.), The philosophy of Quine: Vol. 3, Indeterminacy of translation (pp. 367–383). New York & London: Garland Publishing.
Abel, G. (2004). Zeichen der Wirklichkeit [Signs of reality]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Abel, G. (2006). Die Kunst des Neuen. Kreativität als Problem der Philosophie [The art of the new: Creativity as a problem of philosophy.]. In G. Abel (Ed.), Kreativität (pp. 1–21). Berlin and Hamburg, Germany: Felix Meiner.
Aristotle (1995). Metaphysik [Metaphysics]. In Aristotle, Philosophische Schriften. 5 vols. (H. Bonitz, Vol. 5, book 1, Trans.). Hamburg, Germany: Felix Meiner.
Gettier, E. L. (2000). Is justified true belief knowledge? In S. Bernecker and F. Dretske (Eds.), Knowledge: Readings in contemporary epistemology (pp. 13–15). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Goodman, N. (1983). Fact, fiction, and forecast (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kant, I. (1968). Kritik der reinen Vernunft [Critique of pure reason] (reprinted 2nd ed. of 1787). In Königliche Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften (Ed.), Kants gesammelte Schriften (Vol. 3). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Koehne, T. (2000). Skeptizismus und Epistemologie. Entwicklung und Anwendung der skeptischen Methode in der Philosophie [Skepticism and epistemology: Development and application of the skeptical method in philosophy.]. Munich, Germany: Fink Verlag.
Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (Eds.) (1970). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lenk, H. (1978). Handlung als Interpretationskonstrukt. Entwurf einer konstituenten- und beschreibungstheoretischen Handlungsphilosophie [Action as an interpretational construct: Outline of a constituent and descriptive theoretical philosophy of action]. In H. Lenk (Ed.), Handlungstheorien interdisziplinär (Vol. 2., pp. 279–350). Munich, Germany: Wilhelm Fink.
Mittelstrass, J. (1989). Der Flug der Eule [The flight of the owl]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Peirce, C. S. (1976). The new elements of mathematics (C. Eisele, Ed.), 4. vols. The Hague: Mouton.
Peirce, C. S. (1977). Semiotic and significs: The correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby (C. S. Hardwick, Ed.). Bloomington, IN: University Press.
Plato (1990a). Gorgias. In G. Eigler (Ed.), Plato. Werke in acht Bänden (Vol. 2). Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Plato (1990b). Politeia [The Politics]. In G. Eigler (Ed.), Plato. Werke in acht Bänden (Vol. 4). Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Plato (1990c). Theaitetos [Theaetetus]. In G. Eigler (Ed.), Plato. Werke in acht Bänden (Vol. 6). Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Poser, H. (2001). Wissenschaftstheorie. Eine philosophische Einführung [Theory of science: A philosophical introduction]. Stuttgart, Germany: Philipp Reclam jun.
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth and history. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. (1983). Models and reality. In H. Putnam (Ed.), Philosophical papers: Vol. 3, Realism and reason (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Reply to Chomsky. In D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (Eds.), Words and objections: Essays on the work of W. V. O. Quine (pp. 302–311). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind (with an introduction by Richard Rorty and a study by Robert Brandom). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stegmüller, W. (1979). Rationale Rekonstruktion von Wissenschaft und ihrem Wandel [Rational resconstruction of science and its change]. Stuttgart, Germany: Philipp Reclam jun.
Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Philosophische Untersuchungen I (No. 81). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abel, G. (2008). Forms of Knowledge: Problems, Projects, Perspectives. In: Meusburger, P., Welker, M., Wunder, E. (eds) Clashes of Knowledge. Knowledge and Space, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5555-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5555-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5554-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5555-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)