Hydromorphology — major results and conclusions from the STAR project

  • John Davy-Bowker
  • Mike T. Furse
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 188)


The major results and conclusions of the two papers in the hydromorphology section of the Hydrobiologia special issue on the EU STAR project are summarised. Several key findings have emerged from this research. Firstly, the hydromorphological characteristics of rivers between different geographical regions of Europe were found to vary considerably with rivers in each region possessing distinctive hydromorphological characteristics. Secondly, the hydromorphological attributes that most strongly influence two existing hydromorphological indices (the Habitat Quality Assessment and the Habitat Modification Score) were identified and attention was drawn to the accurate definition and recording of these attributes in field surveys and training courses. Thirdly, links between hydromorphological characteristics and macroinvertebrate quality indices were investigated. Two types of bank modification (resectioning and reinforcement) were significantly correlated with two biotic indices (EPT taxa and MTS), while channel modifications were negatively correlated with ASPT. While biotic indices were often strongly correlated with Habitat Quality Assessment they were less strongly related to Habitat Modification Score suggesting that physical habitat diversity may be more important in determining macroinvertebrate community structure than morphological alteration. The papers in this section provide important underpinning research for the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. In both papers suggestions are made for further research on the hydromorphology of European rivers.

Key words

Water Framework Directive hydromorphology River Habitat Survey data quality macroinvertebrates 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Buffagni, A., S. Erba, D. Armanini, D. De Martini & S. Somaré, 2004. Aspetti idromorfologici e carattere lenticolotico dei fiumi mediterranei: River Habitat Survey e descrittore LRD. In ‘Classificazione ecologica e carattere lentico-lotico in fiumi mediterranei’. Quaderni Istituto di Ricerca sulle Acque, Roma 122: 41–63.Google Scholar
  2. Buffagni, A. & J. L. Kemp, 2002. Looking beyond the shores of the United Kingdom: addenda for the application of River Habitat Survey in Southern European rivers. Journal of Limnology 61: 199–214.Google Scholar
  3. Council of the European Communities, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC, Establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. European Commission PE-CONS 3639/1/100 Rev 1, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  4. Environment Agency, 1997. River Habitat Survey — Field Guidance Manual. Environment Agency, Bristol.Google Scholar
  5. Erba, S., A. Buffagni, N. Holmes, M. O’Hare, P. Scarlett & A. Stenico, 2006. Preliminary testing of River Habitat Survey features for the aims of the WFD hydromorphological assessment: an overview from the STAR Project. Hydrobiologia 566: 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Szoszkiewicz, K., A. Buffagni, J. Davy-Bowker, J. Lesny, B. H. Chojnicki, J. Zbierska, R. Staniszewski & T. Zgola, 2006. Occurrence and variability of River Habitat Survey features across Europe and the consequences for data collection and evaluation. Hydrobiologia 566: 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Davy-Bowker
    • 1
  • Mike T. Furse
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Ecology & HydrologyWinfrith Technology CentreDorchester, DorsetUK

Personalised recommendations