Improved agronomy and management of crop plants for industrial end uses

  • Lorenzo Barbanti
  • Andrea Monti
  • Gianpietro Venturi


Agronomy, the science ruling the fields, has the privilege and the task of dealing with many aspects and related disciplines, covering the biological and the physical sphere. Harmonizing the complex of interactions arising form the organisms, factors and conditions involved in the process of plant growth is not an easy task, as general. Optimising plant growth and crop production, while safeguarding the environment, often proves a harder challenge. In this light, the crops for industrial end-uses may intrinsically be seen as crops of potential large scale, thus exerting a significant influence - both positive and negative — on the environment.


Soil Organic Carbon Geographical Information System Oilseed Rape Sweet Sorghum Precision Agriculture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aboudrare A, Debaeke P, Bouaziz A, Chekli H (2006) Effects of soil tillage and fallow management on soil water storage and sunflower production in a semiarid Mediterranean climate. Agric Water Manage in press (doi: 10.1016/ j.agwat.2005.12.001)Google Scholar
  2. Adamchuk VI, Hummel JW, Morgan MT, Upadhyaya SK (2004) On-the-go soil sensors for precision agriculture. Comput Electron Agric 44: 71–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adamchuk VI, Lund ED, Sethuramasamyraja B, Morgan MT, Dobermann A, Marx DB (2005) Direct measurement of soil chemical properties on-the-go using ion-selective electrodes. Comput Electron Agric 48: 272–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Kaisi MM, Yin X, Licht MA (2005) Soil carbon and nitrogen changes as influenced by tillage and cropping systems in some Iowa soils. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105: 635–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amaducci S, Amaducci MT, Benati R, Venturi G (2000) Crop yield and quality parameters of four annual fibre crops (hemp, kenaf, maize and sorghum) in the North of Italy. Ind Crop Prod 11: 179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amaducci S, Errani M, Venturi G (2002) Plant population effects on fiber hemp morphology and production. J Ind Hemp 7: 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Amaducci S, Monti A, Venturi G (2004) Non-structural carbohydrates and fibre components in sweet and fibre sorghum as affected by low and normal input techniques. Ind Crop Prod 20: 111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Amaducci S (2005) Hemp production in Italy. J Ind Hemp 1: 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Auernhammer H (2001) Precision farming – the environmental challenge. Comput Electron Agric 30: 31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barbanti L, Grandi S, Vecchi A, Venturi G (2006) Sweet and fibre sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), energy crops in the frame of environmental protection from excessive nitrogen loads. Eur J Agron in press (doi: 10.1016/ j.eja.2006.03.001)Google Scholar
  11. Basso B, Ritchie JT, Pierce FJ, Braga RP, Jones JW (2001) Spatial validation of crop models for precision agriculture. Agric Syst 68: 97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bescansa P, Imaz MJ, Virto I, Enrique A, Hoogmoed WB (2006) Soil water retention as affected by tillage and residue management in semiarid Spain. Soil Till Res 87: 19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhattacharyya R, Prakash V, Kundu S, Gupta HS (2006) Effect of tillage and crop rotations on pore size distribution and soil hydraulic conductivity in sandy clay loam soil of the Indian Himalayas. Soil Till Res 86: 129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bledsoe BL, Bales BM (1992) Bale wrap evaluation. ASAE Paper No. 921573Google Scholar
  15. Botta GF, Jorajuria D, Balbuena R, Ressia M, Ferrero C, Rosato H, Tourn M (2006) Deep tillage and traffic effects on subsoil compaction and sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) yields. Soil Till Res in press (doi:10.1016/j.still.2005. 12.011)Google Scholar
  16. Chen Y, Tessier S, Irvine B (2004) Drill and crop performances as affected by different drill configurations for no-till seeding. Soil Till Res 77: 147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I (2000) Water use efficiency and biomass partitioning of three different Miscanthus genotypes with limited and unlimited water supply. Ann Bot 86: 191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coble CG, Egg R (1987) Dry matter losses during hay production and storage of sweet sorghum used for methane production. Biomass 14: 209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Farquhar GD (2004) Breeding for high water-use efficiency. J Exp Bot 55: 2447–2460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Connor DJ, Sadras VO (1992) Physiology of yield expression in sunflower. Field Crop Res 30: 333–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Consoli S, D’Urso G, Toscano A (2006) Remote sensing to estimate ET-fluxes and the performance of an irrigation district in southern Italy. Agric Water Manage 81: 295–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Corwin DL, Plant RE (2005) Applications of apparent soil electrical conductivity in precision agriculture. Comput Electron Agric 46: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Culshaw D, Stokes B (1995) Mechanization of short rotation forestry. Biomass Bioenerg 9, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dam RF, Mehdi BB, Burgess MSE, Madramootoo CA, Mehuys GR, Callum IR (2005) Soil bulk density and crop yield under eleven consecutive years of corn with different tillage and residue practices in a sandy loam soil in central Canada. Soil Till Res 84: 41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Damas M, Prados AM, Gómez F, Olivares G (2001) HidroBus® system: fieldbus for integrated management of extensive areas of irrigated land. Microprocess Microsy 25: 177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Deen W, Kataki PK (2003) Carbon sequestration in a long-term conventional versus conservation tillage experiment. Soil Till Res 74: 143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Di Virgilio N, Monti A, Venturi G (2006) Spatial variability of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) yield as related to soil parameters in a small field. Accepted by Field Crop ResGoogle Scholar
  28. Duiker SW, Beegle DB (2005) Soil fertility distributions in long-term no-till, chisel/disk and moldboard plow/disk systems. Soil Till Res in press (doi: 10.1016/j.still.2005.04.004)Google Scholar
  29. Ercoli L, Mariotti M, Masoni A, Bonari E (1999) Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on biomass yield and efficiency of energy use in crop production of Miscanthus. Field Crop Res 63: 3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Farré I, Faci JM (2006) Comparative response of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agric Water Manage in press (doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2005.11. 001)Google Scholar
  31. Fismes J, Vong PC, Guckert A, Frossard E (2000) Influence of sulphur on apparent N-use efficiency, yield and quality of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) grown on a calcareous soil. Eur J Agron 12: 127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Flagella Z, Rotunno T, Tarantino E, Di Caterina R, De Caro A (2002) Changes in seed yield and oil fatty acid composition of high oleic sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids in relation to the sowing date and the water regime. Eur J Agron 17: 221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fortes PS, Platonov AE, Pereira LS (2005) GISAREG–A GIS based irrigation scheduling simulation model to support improved water use. Agric Water Manage 77: 159–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Frank AB, Berdahl JD, Hanson JD, Liebig MA, Johnson HA (2004) Biomass and Carbon Partitioning in Switchgrass. Crop Sci. 4: 1391–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gajri PR, Gill KS, Chaudhary MR, Singh R (1997) Irrigation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in relation to tillage and mulching. Agric Water Manage 34: 149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gale F, Tuan F, Lohmar B, Hsu H, Gilmour B (2002) China’s food and agriculture: issues for the 21st century. USDA Economic Research Service Agricultural Information Bulletin no. AIB775, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  37. Garten CT, Wüllschleger SD (2000) Soil carbon dynamics beneath switchgrass as indicated by stable isotope analysis. J. Environ. Qual. 29: 645–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gherbin P, De Franchi AS, Lupo F (2005) Esperienze sulla propagazione della canna comune (Arundo donax L.) (in Italian). In :Giuliani MM, Gatta G (eds) Atti XXXVI Convegno Società Italiana di Agronomia, Foggia, I, pp 262–263Google Scholar
  39. Godwin RJ, Wood GA, Taylor JC, Knight SM, Welsh JP (2003) Precision farming of cereal crops: a review of a six year experiment to develop management guidelines. Biosyst Eng 84: 375–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Göksoy AT, Demir AO, Turan ZM, Daǧüstü N (2004) Responses of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) to full and limited irrigation at different growth stages. Field Crop Res 87: 167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Graeff S, Claupein W (2003) Quantifying nitrogen status of corn (Zea mays L.) in the field by reflectance measurements. Eur J Agron 19: 611–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hadders G, Olsson R (1997) Harvest of grass for combustion in late sum-mer and in spring. Biomass Bioenerg 3: 171–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hamilton-Manns M, Ross CW, Horne DJ, Baker CJ (2002) Subsoil loosening does little to enhance the transition to no-tillage on a structurally degraded soil. Soil Till Res 68: 109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Huang M, Shao M, Zhang L, Li Y (2003) Water use efficiency and sustainability of different long-term crop rotation systems in the Loess Plateau of China. Soil Till Res 72: 95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Huisman W, Kortleve WJ (1994) Mechanization of crop establishment, harvest, and post harvest conservation of Miscanthus sinensis x Giganteus. Ind Crops Prod 2: 289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jaggard KW, Stafford J, Lark RM, Fisher S (2000) Are there opportunities for profitable use of precision agriculture in sugar beet crops? In: Proceedings of the 63th IIRB Congress. Interlaken, pp 317–323Google Scholar
  47. Jeuffroy MH, Recous S (1999) Azodyn: a simple model simulating the date of nitrogen deficiency for decision support in wheat fertilization. Eur J Agron 10: 129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jia L, Buerkert A, Chen X, Roemheld V, Zhang F (2004) Low-altitude aerial photography for optimum N fertilization of winter wheat on the North China Plain. Field Crop Res 89: 389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Koch HJ, Stockfisch N (2006) Loss of soil organic matter upon ploughing under a loess soil after several years of conservation tillage. Soil Till Res 86: 73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lankford B (2004) Resource-centred thinking in river basins; should we revoke the crop water requirement approach to irrigation planning? Agric Water Manage 68: 33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Laureti D, Monotti M, Conti D, Del Pino AM, Pieri S, Ridoni G (2006) Girasole: panorama varietale per il 2006 (in Italian). L’Informatore Agrario 10: 34–39Google Scholar
  52. Lewandowski I, Clifton-Brownb JC, Scurlockc JMO, Huismand W (2000) Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop. Biomass Bioenerg 19: 209–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Li XY, Gong JD, Gao QZ, Li FR (2001) Incorporation of ridge and furrow method of rainfall harvesting with mulching for crop production under semiarid conditions. Agric Water Manage 50: 173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Li XY, Gong JD (2002) Effects of different ridge:furrow ratios and supplemental irrigation on crop production in ridge and furrow rainfall harvesting system with mulches. Agric Water Manage 54: 243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Liebig MA, Tanaka DL, Wienhold BJ (2004) Tillage and cropping effects on soil quality indicators in the northern Great Plains. Soil Till Res 78: 131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Liebig MA, Johnsons HA, Hanson JD, Frank AB (2005) Soil Carbon under Switchgrass Stands and Cultivated Cropland. Biom. Bioenerg. 28: 347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Long SP, Zhu XG, Naidu SL, Ort DR (2006) Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yield? Plant Cell Environ 29: 315–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ludlow MM (1989) Strategies of response to water stress. In: Kreeb KH, Ritcher H, Hinckley TM (eds) Structural and Functional Responses to Environmental Stresses, SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp 269–281Google Scholar
  59. Machet JM, Dubrulle P, Louis P (1990) AZOBIL: a computer program for fertilizer N recommendations based on a predictive balance sheet method. In: Scaife A (ed) Proc. 1st Congress of the European Society of Agronomy, Paris, pp 21–22Google Scholar
  60. Malhi SS, Lemke R, Wang ZH, Chhabra BS (2006) Tillage, nitrogen and crop residue effects on crop yield, nutrient uptake, soil quality, and greenhouse gas emissions. Soil Till Res in press (doi: 10.1016/j.still.2005.09.001)Google Scholar
  61. Mastrorilli M, Katerji N, Rana G (1999) Productivity and water use efficiency of sweet sorghum as affected by soil water deficit occurring at different vegetative growth stages. Eur J Agron 11: 207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Matson PA, Parton WJ, Power AG, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277: 504–509CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Metherell AK, Cambardella CA, Parton WJ, Petersen GA, Harding LA, Cole CV (1995) Simulation of soil organic matter dynamics in dryland wheat-fallow cropping systems. In: Lal R, Kimble J, Levine E, Stewart BA (eds) Soil Management and Greenhouse Effect. Adv. Soil Sci., CRC-Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 259–270Google Scholar
  64. Meynard JM, Doré T, Lucas P (2003) Agronomic approach: cropping systems and plant diseases. C R Biol 326: 37–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Monti A, Amaducci MT, Pritoni G, Venturi G (2005a) Growth, fructan yield and quality of chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) as related to photosynthetic capacity, harvest time and water regime. J Exp Bot 56: 1389–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Monti A, Venturi P, Elbersen HW (2001) Evaluation of the establishment of lowland and upland switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) varieties under different tillage and seedbed conditions in northern Italy. Soil Till Res 63: 75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Monti A, Venturi G, Amaducci MT (2002). Comparison among sorghum, kenaf and miscanthus for energy production under different water and nitrogen levels. Riv Agron 36: 213–220Google Scholar
  68. Monti A, Amaducci MT, Venturi G (2005b) Growth response, leaf gas exchange and fructans accumulation of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as affected by different water regimes. Eur J Agron 23: 136–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Morari F, Lugato E, Borin E (2004) An integrated non-point source model-GIS system for selecting criteria of best management practices in the Po Valley, North Italy. Agric Ecosyst Environ 102: 247–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Moser LE (1980) Quality of forages as affected by post-harvest storage and processing. In: Crop Quality, Storage and Utilization, Am Soc Agron, pp 227–260Google Scholar
  71. Murali NS, Secher BJM, Rydahl P, Andreasen FM (1999) Application of information technology in plant protection in Denmark: from vision to reality. Comput Electron Agric 22: 109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Murillo JM, Moreno F, Pelegrín F, Fernández J (1998) Responses of sunflower to traditional and conservation tillage under rainfed conditions in southern Spain. Soil Till Res 49: 233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Németh K (1982) Electro-ultrafiltration of aqueous soil suspension with simultaneously varying temperature and voltage. Plant Soil 64: 7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Oenema O, Kros H, de Vries W (2003) Approaches and uncertainties in nutrient budgets: implications for nutrient management and environmental policies. Eur J Agron 20: 3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Oerke EC, Dehne HW (2004) Safeguarding production–losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop Prot 23: 275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Olson KR, Lang JM, Ebelhar SA (2005) Soil organic carbon changes after 12 years of no-tillage and tillage of Grantsburg soils in southern Illinois. Soil Till Res 81: 217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pagliai M, Vignozzi N, Pellegrini S (2004) Soil structure and the effect of management practices. Soil Till Res 79: 131–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Parrish DJ, Wolf DD, Peterson PR, Daniels WL (1997) Switchgrass as a biofuels crop for the upper Southeast: Variety trials and cultural improvements. Final Report (1992-97) for Biofuels Feedstock Development Program, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  79. Passioura J (2006) Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce–from breeding to field management. Agric Water Manage 80: 176–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Piovanelli C, Gamba C, Brandi G, Simoncini S, Batistoni E (2005) Tillage choices affect biochemical properties in the soil profile. Soil Till Res in press (doi: 10.1016/j.still.2005.08.013)Google Scholar
  81. Rasmussen KJ (1999) Impact of ploughless soil tillage on yield and soil quality: A Scandinavian review. Soil Till Res 53: 3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rees DVH (1982) A discussion of the sources of dry matter loss during the process of haymaking. J Agric Eng Res 27 : 469–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rémy JC, Hébert J (1977) Le devenir des engrais azotes dans le sol (in French), CR Acad Agric France 63, pp 700–710Google Scholar
  84. Rémy JC, Viaux P (1982) The use of nitrogen fertilizers in intensive wheat growing in France. In: Symposium on Fertilizers and Intensive Wheat Production in EEC, The Fertilizer Society, pp 67–92Google Scholar
  85. Reyniers M, Vrindts E, De Baerdemaeker J (2006) Comparison of an aerial-based system and an on the ground continuous measuring device to predict yield of winter wheat. Eur J Agron 24: 87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rinaldi M (2001) Application of EPIC model for irrigation scheduling of sunflower in Southern Italy. Agric Water Manage 49: 185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rinaldi M, Losavio N, Flagella Z (2003) Evaluation and application of the OILCROP–SUN model for sunflower in southern Italy. Agric Syst 78: 17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Robinson TP, Metternicht G (2005) Comparing the performance of techniques to improve the quality of yield maps. Agric Syst 85: 19–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rosenzweig C, Strzepek KM, Major DC, Iglesias A, Yates DN, McCluskey A, Hillel D (2004) Water resources for agriculture in a changing climate: international case studies. Global Environ Chang Part A 14: 345–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Russell JR, Buxton DR (1985) Storage of large round bales of hay at different moisture concentrations and treated with sodium diacetate and/or covered with plastic. Animal Feed Sci Tech 13: 69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Salinas-García JR, Velázquez-García JJ, Gallardo-Valdez M, Díaz-Mederos P, Caballero-Hernández F, Tapia-Vargas LM, Rosales-Robles E (2002) Tillage effects on microbial biomass and nutrient distribution in soils under rain-fed corn production in central-western Mexico. Soil Till Res 66: 143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sanderson MA, Reed RL, Hussey MA, Tischler CR, Read JC, Ocumpaugh WR (1997a) Switchgrass management for biomass energy feedstock in Texas. In: Proc. 18th Int. Grassld. Cong., Winnipeg, Manitoba, and Saskatoon, Sasskatchewan, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  93. Sanderson MA, Egg RP, Wiselogel AE (1997b) Biomass losses during harvest and storage of switchgrass. Biomass Bioenerg 2: 107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Scherer HW (2001) Sulphur in crop production – invited paper. Eur J Agron 14: 81–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Schittenhelm S (1999) Agronomic performance of root chicory, Jerusalem artichoke and sugarbeet in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Sci 39: 1815–1823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Scotford IM, Miller PCH (2005) Applications of spectral reflectance techniques in Northern European cereal production: a review. Biosyst Eng 90: 235–250Google Scholar
  97. Sehy U, Ruser R, Munch JC (2003) Nitrous oxide fluxes from maize fields: relationship to yield, site-specific fertilization, and soil conditions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 99: 97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sepaskhah AR, Kanooni A, Ghasemi MM (2003) Estimating water table contributions to corn and sorghum water use. Agric Water Manage 58: 67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sieling K, Kage H (2006) N balance as an indicator of N leaching in an oilseed rape – winter wheat – winter barley rotation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 115: 261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Singh B, Malhi SS (2006) Response of soil physical properties to tillage and residue management on two soils in a cool temperate environment. Soil Till Res 85: 143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Somerville C, Briscoe J (2001) Genetic engineering and water. Science 292: 2217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Song G, Li L, Pan G, Zhang Q (2005) Topsoil organic carbon storage of China and its loss by cultivation. Biogeochemistry 74: 47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Tan Z, Lal R (2005) Carbon sequestration potential estimates with changes in land use and tillage practice in Ohio, USA. Agric Ecosyst Environ 111: 140–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Tavakkoli AR, Oweis TY (2004) The role of supplemental irrigation and nitrogen in producing bread wheat in the highlands of Iran. Agric Water Manage 65: 225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Thomson AM, Izaurralde RC, Rosenberg NJ, He X (2006) Climate change impacts on agriculture and soil carbon sequestration potential in the Huang–Hai Plain of China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114: 195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Todorovic M, Steduto P (2003) A GIS for irrigation management. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 28: 163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tolk JA, Howell TA (2003) Water use efficiencies of grain sorghum grown in three USA southern Great Plains soils. Agric Water Manage 59: 97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Vamerali T, Bertocco M, Sartori L (2005) Effects of a new wide-sweep opener for no-till planter on seed zone properties and root establishment in maize (Zea mays, L.): A comparison with double-disk opener. Soil Till Res in press (doi: 10.1016/j.still.2005.07.011)Google Scholar
  109. Venturi G. (1970) Confronto fra metodi di raccolta della canapa. Nota II. Destinazione cartaria del prodotto. Industria della Carta 1: 8–18.Google Scholar
  110. Venturi G. (2004) The hemp between tradition and innovation. Int. Symposium: Hemp: perspectives for advanced utilization. Bologna, March 5–6, in pressGoogle Scholar
  111. Venturi P, Monti A, Piani I, Venturi G (2004) Evaluation of harvesting and postharvesting techniques for energy destination of switchgrass. Proc. of the II World Conference on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection, Rome, 1, pp 234–236Google Scholar
  112. Vyn TJ, Galic DM, Janovicek KJ (2002) Corn response to potassium placement in conservation tillage. Soil Till Res 67: 159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Wang WJ, Dalal RC (2005) Carbon inventory for a cereal cropping system under contrasting tillage, nitrogen fertilisation and stubble management practices. Soil Till Res in press (doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.11.005)Google Scholar
  114. Weiss EA (1983) Oilseed crops. Longman Ltd, pp 660Google Scholar
  115. Wiklicky L (1982) Application of the EUF procedure in sugar beet cultivation. Plant Soil 64: 115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Xue Q, Zhu Z, Musick JT, Stewart BA, Dusek DA (2006) Physiological mechanisms contributing to the increased water-use efficiency in winter wheat under deficit irrigation. J Plant Physiol 163: 154–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Yadava UL (1986) A rapid and non-destructive method to determine chlorophyll in intact leaves. HortScience 21: 1449–1450Google Scholar
  118. Zamuner EC, Picone LI, Echeverria HE (2005) Comparison of phosphorus fertilization diagnostic methods for wheat under no-tillage. Soil Till Res in press (doi: 10.1016/j.still.2005.06.010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Barbanti
    • 1
  • Andrea Monti
    • 1
  • Gianpietro Venturi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agro-environmental Science and Technology (DiSTA)BolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations