Development of Layered Sediment Structure and its Effects on Pore Water Transport and Hyporheic Exchange
Hyporheic exchange is known to provide an important control on nutrient and contaminant fluxes across the stream-subsurface interface. Similar processes also mediate interfacial transport in other permeable sediments. Recent research has focused on understanding the mechanics of these exchange processes and improving estimation of exchange rates in natural systems. While the structure of sediment beds obviously influences pore water flow rates and patterns, little is known about the interplay of typical sedimentary structures, hyporheic exchange, and other transport processes in fluvial/alluvial sediments. Here we discuss several processes that contribute to local-scale sediment heterogeneity and present results that illustrate the interaction of overlying flow conditions, the development of sediment structure, pore water transport, and stream-subsurface exchange. Layered structures are shown to develop at several scales within sediment beds. Surface sampling is used to analyze the development of an armor layer in a sand-and-gravel bed, while innovative synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography is used to observe patterns of grain sorting within sand bedforms. We show that layered bed structures involving coarsening of the bed surface increase interfacial solute flux but produce an effective anisotropy that favors horizontal pore water transport while limiting vertical penetration.
Keywordsfluvial processes hyporheic exchange sediment structure sediment transport solute transport streams and rivers streambeds surface-groundwater interactions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Boudreau, B. P., & Jorgensen, B. B. (Eds.) (2001). The benthic boundary layer (p. 440). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Cardenas, M. B., Wilson, J. L., & Zlotnik, V. A. (2004). Impact of heterogeneity, bed forms, and stream curvature on subchannel hyporheic exchange. Water Resources Research, 40, W08307. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.129/2004WR003008.Google Scholar
- Church, M. A., McLean, D. G., & Wolcott, J. F. (1987). River bed gravels: Sampling and analysis. In C. R. Thorne, J. C. Bathurst, & R. D. Hey (Eds.), Sediment transport in gravel-bed rivers (pp. 43–79). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Colbeck, S. C. (1997). Model of wind pumping for layered snow. Journal of Glaciology, 43, 60–65.Google Scholar
- Jones, J. B., & Mulholland, P. J. (Eds.) (2000). Streams and ground waters (p. 425). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
- Leopold, L. B., Wolman, M. G., & Miller, J. P. (1964). Fluvial processes in geomorphology (p. 535). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Packman, A. I., & Bencala, K. E. (2000). Modeling methods in the study of surface-subsurface hydrologic interactions. In J. B. Jones & P. J. Mulholland (Eds.), Streams and ground waters (pp. 45–80). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
- Powell, D. M. (1998). Patterns and processes of sediment sorting in gravel-bed rivers. Progress in Physical Geography, 22, 1–32.Google Scholar
- Salehin, M., Packman, A. I., & Paradis, M. (2004). Hyporheic exchange with heterogeneous streambeds: Modeling and laboratory experiments. Water Resources Research, 40, W11504. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002567.Google Scholar
- Winter, T. C., Harvey, J. W., Franke, O. H., & Alley, W. M. (1998). Ground water and surface water: A single resource. USGS Circular, 1139, 79 pp.Google Scholar