Advertisement

Risk assessment method for submerged weeds in New Zealand hydroelectric lakes

  • J. Clayton
  • P. Champion
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology book series (DIHY, volume 190)

Abstract

The latent potential for problematic weed growth in a hydro-lake is proportional to water level fluctuation, water clarity, lake shape, littoral gradient and exposure to wave action. These five factors were used to assess a score for measuring the latent potential for weed impact and each factor was allocated a score of 1–5, with a theoretical maximum of 25. Any hydro-lake scoring above 15 could be expected to present potential inconvenience to power generation, given the presence of suitable submerged weed species. Assessment of potential impact arising from weed invasion must firstly determine what species are already established, and whether it is possible for a weed species of greater potential impact to be introduced. The risk of this occurring is dependent upon a number of factors, including public accessibility, proximity to sources of those species and the desirability of the waterbody to potential weed vectors. Once these factors are quantified, appropriate surveillance strategies in high-risk hydro-lakes may then be developed.

Key words

aquatic plants weed potential risk assessment weed management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ali, M. M., A. Hamad, I. V. Springuel & K. J. Murphy, 1995. Environmental factors affecting submerged macrophyte communities in regulated waterbodies in Egypt. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie 133: 107–128.Google Scholar
  2. Clayton, J. S., 1982. Effects of fluctuations in water level and growth of Lagarosiphon major on the aquatic vascular plants in Lake Rotorua 1973-80. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 16: 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clayton, J. S., 1996. Aquatic weeds and their control in New Zealand Lakes. Lake and Reservoir Management 12: 477–486.Google Scholar
  4. Champion, P. D. & J. S. Clayton, 2001. A weed risk assessment model for aquatic weeds in New Zealand. In Groves, R. H., F. D. Panetta & J. G. Virtue (eds), Weed Risk Assessment. CSIRO Publications, Melbourne, pp 244.Google Scholar
  5. Haramoto, T. & I. Ikusima, 1988. Life cycle of Egeria densa Planch., an aquatic plant naturalized in Japan. Aquatic Botany 30: 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Howard-Williams, C. & J. Davies, 1998. The invasion of Lake Taupo by the submerged water weed Lagarosiphon major and its impact on the native flora. New. Zealand Journal of Ecology 11: 13–19.Google Scholar
  7. Howard-Williams, C., J. S. Clayton, B. T. Coffey & I. M. Johnstone, 1987. Macrophyte invasions. In Viner A. B. (ed.), Inland Waters of New Zealand. DSIR Bulletin 241, 319 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Johnstone, I. M., B. T. Coffey & C. Howard-Williams, 1987. The role of recreational boat traffic in interlake dispersal of macrophytes: a New Zealand case study. Journal of Environmental Management 20: 263–279.Google Scholar
  9. Spencer, W. E. & R. G. Wetzel, 1993. Acclimation of photosynthesis and dark respiration of a submersed angiosperm beneath ice in a temperate lake. Plant Physiology 101: 985–991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Springuel, I. & K. J. Murphy, 1991. Euhydrophyte communities of the River Nile and its impoundments in Egyptian Nubia. Hydrobiologia 218: 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Widgery, D. E., 1967. Water weeds versus water power. In Chapman V. J. & C. A. Bell (eds), Rotorua and Waikato Water Weeds. University of Auckland, 76 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Clayton
    • 1
  • P. Champion
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of Water and Atmospheric ResearchHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations