Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Campbell, Donald T. & Stanley, Julian C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Cronbach, Lee J., Nageswari, R. & Gleser, G.C. (1963). Theory of generalizability: A liberation of reliability theory. The British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16, 137–163.
Cronbach, Lee J., Gleser, G.C., Nanda, H. & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: John Wiley.
Daston, Lorraine. (1988). Classical probability in the enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Foucault, Michel. (1973). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Random House, Inc.
Hacking, Ian (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hacking, Ian. (1995). The looping effects of human kinds. In Sperber, D., Premack, D. & Premack A.J. (Eds), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 351–394). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hacking, Ian. (2001). An introduction to probability and inductive logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Heilbron, Johann (1995). The rise of social theory. (S. Gogol, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hilts, Victor L. (1981). Statist and statistician. New York: Arno Press.
Hume, David (1777/1964). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Steinberg, E. (Ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Koopman, Jim. (1999). Balancing validity, precision, generalizability and importance in the design of epidemiological investigations. [Epid655 Lecture of 1-22-99.] http://www.sph.umich.edu/epid/epid655/TradeOffNotes.htm. Accessed August 21, 2005.
Mill, John S. (1843/1964). Inductive grounds for induction. [from A System of Logic] In: Copi, I.M. & Gould, J.A. (Eds.), Readings on logic (pp. 275–286). New York: Macmillan.
Myung, Jae, Balasubramanian, Vijay & Pitt, Mark A. (2000 October 10). Counting probability distributions: Differential geometry and model selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(21): 11170–11175. Published online 2000 September 26. Accessed August 20, 2005.
Pearson, Karl. (1978). The history of statistics in the 17th and 18th centuries against the changing background of intellectual, scientific and religious thought: Lectures by Karl Pearson given at the University College London during the academic sessions 1921–1933. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.
Popkewitz, Thomas S. (2001). Educational statistics as a system of reason: On governing education and social inclusion and exclusion. In: P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Philosophy and history of the discipline of education: Evaluation and evolution of the criteria for educational research. Leuven: Research Community.
Porter, Theodore M. (1986). The rise of statistical thinking 1820–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Porter, Theodore M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Russell, Bertrand. (1914/1964). The principle of induction. [from The Problems of Philosophy] In: Copi, I.M. & Gould, J.A. (Eds.), Readings on Logic (pp. 306–310). New York: Macmillan.
Shavelson, Richard. & Dempsey-Atwood, Nancy. (1976). Generalizability of measures of teaching behavior. Review of Educational Research, 46(4), 553–611.
Shavelson, Richard, Phillips, Dennis C., Towne, Lisa & Feuer, M.J. (2003). On the science of education design studies, Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25–28.
Stigler, Stephen M. (1986). The history of statistics: The measurement of uncertainly before 1900. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Thompson, Bruce. (1989 April). Statistical significance, result importance, and result generalizability: Three noteworthy but somewhat different issues. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 2–6.
Wagner, P. (1994). A sociology of modernity: Liberty and discipline. New York: Routledge.
What Works, Criteria for Evaluation. http://www.whatworks.ed.gov/reviewprocess/standards.html.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fendler, L. (2006). Why Generalizability is not Generalizable. In: Smeyers, P., Depaepe, M. (eds) Educational Research: Why ‘What Works’ Doesn't Work. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5308-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5308-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5307-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5308-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)