Skip to main content
  • 1305 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Campbell, Donald T. & Stanley, Julian C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, Lee J., Nageswari, R. & Gleser, G.C. (1963). Theory of generalizability: A liberation of reliability theory. The British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16, 137–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, Lee J., Gleser, G.C., Nanda, H. & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine. (1988). Classical probability in the enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. (1973). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Random House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian. (1995). The looping effects of human kinds. In Sperber, D., Premack, D. & Premack A.J. (Eds), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 351–394). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian. (2001). An introduction to probability and inductive logic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbron, Johann (1995). The rise of social theory. (S. Gogol, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilts, Victor L. (1981). Statist and statistician. New York: Arno Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David (1777/1964). An enquiry concerning human understanding. Steinberg, E. (Ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Jim. (1999). Balancing validity, precision, generalizability and importance in the design of epidemiological investigations. [Epid655 Lecture of 1-22-99.] http://www.sph.umich.edu/epid/epid655/TradeOffNotes.htm. Accessed August 21, 2005.

  • Mill, John S. (1843/1964). Inductive grounds for induction. [from A System of Logic] In: Copi, I.M. & Gould, J.A. (Eds.), Readings on logic (pp. 275–286). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myung, Jae, Balasubramanian, Vijay & Pitt, Mark A. (2000 October 10). Counting probability distributions: Differential geometry and model selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(21): 11170–11175. Published online 2000 September 26. Accessed August 20, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Karl. (1978). The history of statistics in the 17th and 18th centuries against the changing background of intellectual, scientific and religious thought: Lectures by Karl Pearson given at the University College London during the academic sessions 19211933. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, Thomas S. (2001). Educational statistics as a system of reason: On governing education and social inclusion and exclusion. In: P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Philosophy and history of the discipline of education: Evaluation and evolution of the criteria for educational research. Leuven: Research Community.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Theodore M. (1986). The rise of statistical thinking 18201900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Theodore M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. (1914/1964). The principle of induction. [from The Problems of Philosophy] In: Copi, I.M. & Gould, J.A. (Eds.), Readings on Logic (pp. 306–310). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, Richard. & Dempsey-Atwood, Nancy. (1976). Generalizability of measures of teaching behavior. Review of Educational Research, 46(4), 553–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, Richard, Phillips, Dennis C., Towne, Lisa & Feuer, M.J. (2003). On the science of education design studies, Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, Stephen M. (1986). The history of statistics: The measurement of uncertainly before 1900. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Bruce. (1989 April). Statistical significance, result importance, and result generalizability: Three noteworthy but somewhat different issues. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, P. (1994). A sociology of modernity: Liberty and discipline. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • What Works, Criteria for Evaluation. http://www.whatworks.ed.gov/reviewprocess/standards.html.

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fendler, L. (2006). Why Generalizability is not Generalizable. In: Smeyers, P., Depaepe, M. (eds) Educational Research: Why ‘What Works’ Doesn't Work. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5308-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics