Abstract
A Geothermal Response Test measures the temperature response to a thermal energy forcing of a borehole heat exchanger. The temperature response is related to the ground and borehole thermal parameters such as thermal conductivity, heat capacity and the conductivity of the borehole material and is therefore used to obtain estimates on these important parameters. Generally such data are analysed using a line source method. Although quick and, when certain conditions are met, accurate, the line source method has several drawbacks. First of all it is only valid for the constant heat flux case, secondly it only allows estimates of ground thermal conductivity and borehole resistance, other parameters, like heat capacity, cannot be estimated. Thirdly effects of ground water flow cannot be quantified. Moreover, selecting test parameters a-priory is not always easy and it is difficult to adjust test conditions due to the necessity of constant heat flux. Parameter estimation techniques have been developed to allow analysis of test results under varying heat flux conditions and to allow simultaneous estimates of different parameters to be obtained. In this paper we develop such a method based on the TRNSYS simulation package with the DST borehole model, using a generic optimisation package—GenOpt—to perform the calibration. Moreover we extend the GRT test protocol to use different heat extraction and injection energy levels within the same experiment. Apart from improving estimates of ground and borehole thermal parameters, it is our final goal to allow the characterisation of ground water flow using the in situ thermal response test.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Austin, W.A., 1998. Development of an In-Situ System for Measuring Ground Thermal Properties, MSc. Thesis, Oklahoma State University, USA, 164 pp.
Austin, W.A., C. Yazuzturk, and J.D. Spitler, 2000. Development of an in-situ system for measuring ground thermal properties, ASHRAE Trans., 106 (1) 365–379.
Brown, R.L., J. Durbin, and J.M. Evans, 1975. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time, J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 37(2), 149–192.
Clauser, C. (ed), 2003. Numerical Simulation of Flow in Hot Aquifers, SHEMAT and Processing SHEMAT, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg.
Eklöf, C., and S. Gehlin, 1996. TED—A mobile equipment for Thermal Response Tests, Master’s Thesis 1996: 198E, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden.
Gehlin, S., 1998. Thermal Response Test, In-Situ Measurements of Thermal Properties in Hard Rock, Licentiate Thesis, No. 37, Luleå University of Technology, Department of Environmental Engineering, Division of Water Resources Engineering, 41 pp.
Gehlin, S., and P.E. Hellström, 2003. Comparison of four models for thermal response test evaluation, ASHRAE Trans., 109 (1), 1–12.
Hellström, G., 1989. Duct Ground Heat Storage Model, Manual for Computer Code, Department of Mathematical Physics, University of Lund, Sweden.
Hooke, R., and T.A. Jeeves, 1961. `Direct Search’ solution of numerical and statistical problems, J. Assoc. Comp. Mach., 8 (2), 212–229.
Ingersoll, L.R., and H.J. Plass, 1948. Theory of the ground pipe heat source for the heat pump, ASHVE Trans., 47, 339–348.
Kavenaugh, S.P., 1984. Simulation and experimental verification of vertical ground-coupled heat pump systems, PhD dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma.
Klein, S.A., J.A. Duffie, and W.A. Beckman, 1976. TRNSYS—a transient simulation program, ASHRAE Trans., 82, 623.
Mogeson, P., 1983. Fluid to duct wall heat transfer in duct heat storages, Proceedings of the International Conference on Subsurface Heat Storage in Theory and Parctice, Swedish Council for Building Research.
Nelder, J.A., and R. Mead, 1965. A simplex method for function minimization, Comput. J. 7 (1), 308–313.
Van Gelder, A.J., H.J.L. Witte, S. Kalma, A. Snijders, and R.G.A. Wennekes, 1999. In-situ Messungen der thermische Eigenschaften des Untergrunds durch Wärmeentzug, edited by T. Hitziger, OPET Seminar “Erdgekoppelte Wärmepumpen zum heizen und Klimatisieren von Gebäuden”, 109 pp.
Wagner, R., and C. Clauser, 2005. Evaluating thermal response test using parameter estimation on thermal conductivity and thermal capacity, J. Geophys. Eng., 2, 349–356.
Wetter, M., 2004. GenOpt, Generic Optimization Program version 2.0.0. Technical Report LBNL-54199, Lawrence Berkely National Laboratory, Berkely, CA.
Witte, H.J.L., A.J. van Gelder, and J.D. Spitler, 2002. In situ measurement of ground thermal conductivity: The Dutch perspective, ASHRAE Trans., 108 (1).
Yavuzturk, C., J.D. Spitler, and S.J. Rees, 1999. A transient two-dimensional finite volume model for the simulation of vertical U-tube ground heat exchangers, ASHRAE Trans., 10592, 465–474.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Witte, H.J. (2007). ADVANCES IN GEOTHERMAL RESPONSE TESTING. In: Paksoy, H.Ö. (eds) Thermal Energy Storage for Sustainable Energy Consumption. NATO Science Series, vol 234. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5290-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5290-3_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-5288-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-5290-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)