Hedges and green lanes: vegetation composition and structure

  • M. P. Walker
  • J. W. Dover
  • T. H. Sparks
  • S. A. Hinsley
Chapter
Part of the Topics in Biodiversity and Conservation book series (TOBC, volume 3)

Abstract

In this paper the vegetation of 20 green lanes, defined as tracks bounded by hedgerows, is examined in terms of composition and structure and compared with that of 20 matched single hedgerows. For analysis the vegetation of the lanes was separated into three areas; central track, verges inside of hedgerows and verges outside of hedgerows. The vegetation of these areas was found to differ in species richness, community structure, plant strategies and environmental traits. When compared with verges of the matched single hedgerows, the inside verges and central track were greatly different whereas the outside verge appeared broadly similar. Green lanes contained significantly more plant species than matched single hedgerows, differences being most pronounced when compared as landscape units, rather than as a mean of the constituent parts. The potential effect of surrounding land use on green lane floral diversity is discussed as well as the importance of maintaining the structural diversity of green lanes for farmland biodiversity.

Key words

Farmland Field margins Flora Green lane Hedgerow Hedge Vegetation Verges 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aude E., Tybirk K. and Bruus Pederson M. 2003. Vegetation diversity of conventional and organic hedgerows in Denmark. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 99: 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barr C.J., Britt C.P. and Sparks T.H. 1995. Hedgerow Management and Wildlife: A Review of Research on the Effects of Hedgerow Management and Adjacent Land on Biodiversity. ITE/ADAS.Google Scholar
  3. Barr C.J., Bunce R.G.H., Clarke R.T., Fuller R.M., Furse M.T., Gillespie M.K., Groom G.B., Hallam C.J., Hornung M., Howard D.C. and Ness M.J. 1993. Countryside Survey 1990. Department of the Environment, Main Report.Google Scholar
  4. Benton T.G., Bryant D.M., Cole L. and Crick H.Q.P. 2002. Linking agricultural practice to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades. Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 673–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boutin C. and Jobin B. 1998. Intensity of agricultural practices and effects on adjacent habitats. Ecological Applications 8: 544–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carey P.D., Barnett C.L., Greenslade P.D., Hulmes S., Garbutt R.A., Warman E.A., Myhill D., Scott R.J., Smart S.M., Manchester H.J., Robinson J., Walker K.J., Howard D.C. and Firbank L.G. 2002. A comparison of the ecological quality of land between an English agri-environment scheme and the countryside as a whole. Biological Conservation 108: 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Croxton P.J., Carvell C., Mountford J.O. and Sparks T.H. 2002. A comparison of green lanes and field margins as bumblebee habitat in an arable landscape. Biological Conservation 107: 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Croxton P.J., Hann J.P., Greatorex-Davies J.N. and Sparks T.H. 2005. Linear hotspots? The floral diversity of green lanes. Biological Conservation 121: 579–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dover J.W., Sparks T.H. and Greatorex-Davies J.N. 1997. The importance of shelter for butterflies in open landscapes. Journal of Insect Conservation 1: 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dover J.W., Sparks T., Clarke S., Gobbett K. and Glossop S. 2000. Linear features and butterflies: the importance of green lanes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 80: 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dover J. and Sparks T. 2000. A review of the ecology of butterflies in British hedgerows. Journal of Environmental Management 60: 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dover J.W. and Sparks T.H. 2001. Green lanes: biodiversity reservoirs in farmland?. In: Barr C.J. and Petit S. (eds), Hedgerows of the World: Their Ecological Functions in different landscapes. IALE (UK), Lymm, pp. 241–250.Google Scholar
  13. Grime J.P., Hodgson J.G. and Hunt R. 1988. Comparative Plant Ecology: A Functional Approach to Common British Species. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
  14. Haines-Young R.H., Barr C.J., Black H.I.J., Briggs D.J., Bunce R.G.H., Clarke R.T., Cooper A., Dawson F.H., Firbank L.G., Fuller R.M., Furse M.T., Gillespie M.K., Hill R., Hornung M., Howard D.C., McCann T., Morecroft M.D., Petit S., Sier A.R.J., Smart S.M., Smith G.M., Stott A.P., Stuart R.C. and Watkins J.W. 2000. Accounting for Nature: Assessing Habitats in the UK Countryside. DETR, London.Google Scholar
  15. Hill M.O., Mountford J.O., Roy D.B. and Bunce R.G.H. 1999. Ellenberg’s Indicator Values for British Plants. HMSO, Norwich.Google Scholar
  16. Hinsley S.A. and Bellamy P.E. 2000. The influence of hedge structure, management and landscape context on the value of hedgerows to birds: a review. Journal of Environmental Management 60: 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kleijn D. and Snoeijing G.I.J. 1997. Field boundary vegetation and the effects of agrochemical drift: Botanical change caused by low levels of herbicide and fertilizer. Journal of Applied Ecology 34: 1413–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maudsley M. 2000. A review of the ecology and conservation of hedgerow invertebrates in Britain. Journal of Environmental Management 60: 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCollin D., Jackson J.I., Bunce R.G.H., Barr C.J. and Stuart R. 2000. Hedgerows as habitat for woodland plants. Journal of Environmental Management 60: 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moonen A.C. and Marshall E.J.P. 2001. The influence of sown margin strips, management and boundary structure on herbaceous field margin vegetation in two neighbouring farms in southern England. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 86: 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parish T., Lakhani K.H. and Sparks T.H. 1994. Modelling the relationship between bird population variables and hedgerow and other field margin attributes. I. Species richness of winter, summer and breeding birds. Journal of Applied Ecology 31: 764–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Siegel S. and Castellan N.J. 1988. Non-parametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Sparks T.H., Parish T. and Hinsley S.A. 1996. Breeding birds in field boundaries in an agricultural landscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 60: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stoate C. 1996. The changing face of lowland farming and wildlife Part 2 1945–1995. British Wildlife 7: 162–172.Google Scholar
  25. Tsiouris S. and Marshall E.P.J. 1998. Observations on patterns of granular fertiliser deposition beside hedges and its likely effects on the botanical composition of field margins. Annals of Applied Biology 132: 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. P. Walker
    • 1
  • J. W. Dover
    • 1
  • T. H. Sparks
    • 2
  • S. A. Hinsley
    • 2
  1. 1.Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and ScienceStaffordshire UniversityStoke-On-TrentUK
  2. 2.CEH Monks WoodHuntingdon, CambridgeshireUK

Personalised recommendations