National Versus Regional Policy Dimensions of TVET
In recent years, there has been increasing interest on the importance of regions as a focus for planning and delivery of technical and vocational education and training (TVET), and in the processes and formation of national policy to encompass regional needs. More broadly, there has also been growing interest in regions as the focus for learning and skills development and innovation.
KeywordsFederal System Workforce Development National Training Commonwealth Funding Ministerial Council
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Australia. Department of Education, Science and Training. 2005. Framework for the New National Training System. Canberra: DEST.Google Scholar
- Australian National Training Authority. 2003 Australia’s National Strategy for Vocational Education and Training, 2004–2010. This information can now be found on the website of DEST: <antapubs.dest.gov.au/publications/images/publications/national_strategy.txt>
- National Centre for Vocational Education Research. 2005. Australian vocational education and training statistics: students and courses 2004. Adelaide, Australia: NCVER. <www.ncver.edu.au/statistic/publications/1602.html>
- Noonan, P. 2003. Rethinking VET: some major policy implications. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University, Centre for Economics of Education and Training. <www.education.monash.edu.au/centres/ceet/docs/conferencepapers/2003confpapernoonan.pdf>
- Noonan, P. 2004. The post-election policy context for VET. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University, Centre for Economics of Education and Training. <www.education.monash.edu.au/centres/ceet/docs/conferencepapers/2004confpapernoonan.pdf>
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001. Cities regions and the new learning economy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar