Advertisement

Special Needs Education and TVET: The Perspective from the United States

  • Michael W. Harvey

Workforce development, human capital and productivity have been interconnected for decades concerning local, regional, state/provincial, national and even international economic success and power. Economies are driven by production, the sales of goods and services, and workforce productivity (Harvey, 2001). Today’s climate of globalization, advanced technology, high skills and demand for quality goods and services at competitive prices, driven by the demand for greater market share, are factors that have shaped all nations’ economies, especially that of the United States. The need for skilled workers and a productive workforce has been part of public policy development concerning education and workforce development within the United States for years.

Keywords

Transition Service Workforce Development Transitional Service Vocational Education Programme National Education Longitudinal Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Association for Career and Technical Education. 1999. User’s guide to the Workforce Investment Act of 1998. Alexandria, VA: ACTE.Google Scholar
  2. Baer, R. et al. 2003. A collaborative follow-up study on transition service utilization and post-school outcomes. Career development for exceptional individuals, vol. 26, pp. 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carnevale, A.P.; Desrochers, D.M. 2002. The missing middle: aligning education and the knowledge economy. The journal for vocational special needs education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
  4. Carnevale, A.P.; Gainer, L.J.; Villet, J. 1990. Training in America. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Custer, R.L.; Panagos, R.J. 1996. Effectiveness of vocational educators: perceptions of training needs and barriers for working with students with special needs. The journal for vocational special needs education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 17–25.Google Scholar
  6. Flexer, R.W. et al. 2005. Transition planning for secondary students with disabilities, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  7. Frantz, N.R. et al. 1996. Standards of quality for the preparation and certification of trade and industrial education teachers. Journal of industrial teacher education, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 31–40.Google Scholar
  8. Gajar, A.; Goodman, L.; McAfee, J. 1993. Secondary schools and beyond: transition of individuals with mild disabilities. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Gordon, E.E. 2000. Skill wars: winning the battle for productivity and profit. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  10. Gray, K. 2001. The role of career and technical education in the American high school: a student centered analysis. The journal for vocational special needs education, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 15–25.Google Scholar
  11. Haggerty, C. et al. 1996. National Education Longitudinal Study (NELS: 88/94) methodology report. Technical report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  12. Halpern, A.S. 1985. Transition: a look at the foundations. Exceptional children, vol. 51, pp. 479–586.Google Scholar
  13. Harvey, M.W. 1999. Perceptions of vocational special needs: concerns and comparisons from area vocational technical center and comprehensive high school educators. Workforce education forum, vol. 26, pp. 40–57.Google Scholar
  14. Harvey, M.W. 2000. How do vocational educators fare in working with students with special needs: perceptions from the field. The journal for vocational special needs education, vol. 22, pp. 25–37.Google Scholar
  15. Harvey, M.W. 2001. Postsecondary employment status’ influence on future education public policy: findings from the National Education Longitudinal Study. The journal for vocational special needs education, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 21–32.Google Scholar
  16. Harvey, M.W. 2002. Comparison of postsecondary transitional outcomes between students with and without disabilities by secondary vocational education participation: findings from the National Education Longitudinal Study. Career development for exceptional individuals, vol. 25, pp. 99–122.Google Scholar
  17. Harvey, M.W.; Cotton, S.E.; Koch, K.R. 2005. Secondary career and technical education program expectations for students with and without disabilities: perceptions of Indiana and Pennsylvania instructors. Workforce education forum, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 35–57.Google Scholar
  18. Harvey, M.W.; Koch, K.R. 2004. No child left behind: policymakers need to reconsider secondary career and technical education for students with special needs. Workforce education forum, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  19. Harvey, M.W.; Pellock, C. 2003. Influences of student educational labels, behaviors, and learning characteristics as perceived by Pennsylvania secondary career and technical educators: a case study approach. The journal for vocational special needs education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 30–41.Google Scholar
  20. Hecker, D.E. 2001. Occupational employment projections to 2010. <www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2001/11/art4full.pdf>
  21. Hochlander, G. 2006. Ready for college and careers: no longer a second-class citizen, vocational education contributes deeper learning while raising job prospects. The school administrator, vol. 1. <www.aasa.org/publications/saarticle.detail.cfm?ItemNumber=4917& snItemNumber=950>
  22. Kohler, P.D. 1996. Taxonomy for transition programming. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  23. Kohler, P.D. 1998. Implementing a transition perspective of education. In: Rusch, F.R.; Chadsey, J.G., eds. Beyond high school: transition from school to work, pp. 179–205. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  24. Kraska, M.F. 1996. Trade and industrial teachers’ knowledge related to special populations. Journal of industrial teacher education, vol. 33, pp. 47–59.Google Scholar
  25. Kraska, M.F. 1997. T & I teachers and inclusion: attitudes of trade and industrial education teachers toward inclusion. The journal for vocational special needs education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 9–21.Google Scholar
  26. Kortering, L.J.; Braziel, P.M. 2001. A look at the consumer’s perspective of secondary special education: implications for the role of vocational special educators. The journal for vocational special needs education, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
  27. Meers, G.D.; Towne, V.A. 1997. Missions and milestones: yesterday, today, and tomorrow in vocational special needs education. The journal of vocational special needs education, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 94–98.Google Scholar
  28. National Alliance of Business. 1999. Workforce economics. Washington, DC: NAB.Google Scholar
  29. National Alliance of Business. 2000. Percentage of high school students by type of academic concentration completed 1982 and 1998. <www.nab.com/PDF/1>
  30. National Association of Secondary School Principals. 2005. What counts: defining and improving high school graduation. Reston, VA: NASSP.Google Scholar
  31. National Center on Education and the Economy. 1990. America’s choice: high skills or low wages. Washington, DC: NCEE.Google Scholar
  32. National Organization on Disability. 2000. Harris Survey of Americans with disabilities. Washington, DC: NOD.Google Scholar
  33. Phelps, L.A.; Hanley-Maxwell, C. 1997. School-to-work transition for youth with disabilities: a review of outcomes and practices. Review of educational research, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 197–226.Google Scholar
  34. Rojewski, J.W.; Pollard, R.R.; Meers, G.D. 1990. Practices and attitudes of secondary industrial education teachers toward students with special needs. Journal of industrial teacher education, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 17–32. (ED 357 535).Google Scholar
  35. Sarkees-Wircenski, M.; Scott, J.L. 2003. Special populations in career and technical education, 3rd ed. Homewood, IL: American Technical Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  36. Test, D.W.; Aspel, N.P.; Everson, J.M. 2006. Transition methods for youth with disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  37. United States Department of Education. 2002. National assessment of vocational education: interim report to Congress. <www.ed.gov/offices/OUS/PES/NAVE/interim_report.pdf>
  38. Wagner, M. 1991. The benefit of secondary vocational education for young people with disabilities: findings from the national longitudinal transition study of special education students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. (Report No. EC 300 485.) (ED 334 739.)Google Scholar
  39. Will, M. 1984. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) Programming for the Transition of Youth with Disabilities: bridges from school to working Life. (ED 256 153.)Google Scholar
  40. Ysseldyke, J.; Algozzine, B.; Thurlow, M. 2000. Critical issues in special education, 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael W. Harvey
    • 1
  1. 1.Special Education DepartmentTeachers College, Ball State UniversityMuncieUnited States of America

Personalised recommendations