Urban Education Dystopia, 2050: A Response from Europe

  • Elisabet Öhrn
  • Gaby Weiner
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 19)

This is a response to the dystopic scenario proposed from the position of the Pacific Rim by Allan Luke, from the editors of the European section of the Handbook. While we recognize the picture that Luke paints, and the range of debates about the future among, for example, urban planners, social demographers, sociologists, environmentalists, and cultural theorists, we turn to political scientists rather than fiction writers, to create two potential scenarios for Europe for the year 2050. We recognize that Western Europe like the rest of the world, is affected by global changes such as environmental disaster (flooding as well as heat waves), economic upheaval (increased influence of multinationals, widening gaps between the rich and the poor) cultural homogenization (globalization of popular culture as well as policy) geographic modifications (enlargement of European Union) and demographic change (flow of immigrants from South to North and from rural to urban). However, in comparison with the rest of the world, Western or “old” Europe has been generally stable (since the end of World War II at least) accompanied by increasing prosperity and sustained efforts at developing structures of cooperation rather than conflict. This is embodied in the establishment and growth of the European Union (EU), an intergovernmental and supranational union of 25 democratic member states from the European continent, which was established under that name in 1992 by the Treaty on European Union (the Maastricht Treaty). However, many aspects of the Union developed from 1951 onwards, through a series of predecessor formal and informal relationships.

Keywords

Europe 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brine, J. (1999). Under educating women: Globalizing inequality. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bruno, I., Jacquot, S., & Mandin, L. (2006). Europeanization through its instrumentation: Benchmarking, mainstreaming and the open method of co-ordination … toolbox or Pandora's box? Journal of European Public Policy, 13(4), 519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caporaso, J. A., & Wittenbrinck, J. (2006). The new modes of governance and political authority in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(4), 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edquist, K. (2006). EU social policy governance: Advocating activism or servicing states. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(4), 500–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Einhorn, B., & Gregory, J. (1998). Introduction. The European Journal of Women's Studies special issue: The Idea of Europe, 5(3–4), 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. López-Santana, M. (2006). The domestic implications of European soft law: Framing and transmitting change in employment policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(4), 481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Young, H. (1999). This blessed plot: Britain and Europe from Churchill to Blair. London: Overlook Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabet Öhrn
    • 1
  • Gaby Weiner
    • 2
  1. 1.Boras University CollegeSweden
  2. 2.Edinburgh UniversityScotland

Personalised recommendations