Advertisement

Dutch Urban Schools and Teachers' Professionalism

  • Yvonne Leeman
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 19)

Urban life is a bundle of contradictions. The urban city offers opportunities to meet people from all over the world. It offers all kinds of cultural stimuli through art exhibitions, theatre and music. Opportunities to participate in sport are legion in the city: you are not confined to just the one local handball club. There is a lot to choose from but does everyone have such a wide range of choice? Poverty and cultural distinctions prevent equal access. The big city, part of the global economy, with its constant activity, gives access, at least for the well-educated, to the international job market. Those with lower qualifications have less interesting opportunities or simply no work. Urban culture is highly individualistic: “I have the right to choose what I want and to express what I think.” At the same time, however, there are neighborhoods with immigrants from the rural areas of Turkey and Morocco, who keep their rural traditions alive, exercise social control on each other and are not in the habit of crossing the borders of their neighborhoods. Saucer antennas on balconies mark the streets where they live.

Dutch cities are relatively small. There are no huge, virtually isolated, suburbs like the banlieus in Paris (van Zanten, 2001). The public transport system connects different parts of the city. Some people who live in Amsterdam cycle from one side of the city to the other every day to go to work. However there is a high degree of diversity among the inhabitants, growing inequality of wealth, marketization of the public sector, and a tendency toward segregation in housing patterns operating alongside a social housing policy that aims to keep communities socially and economically mixed.

Keywords

Immigrant Student School Choice Inant Interaction Multicultural Society Ethnic Segregation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aboutaleb, A. (2005). Een pleidooi voor lokaal onderwijsbeleid. [A plea for local education policy] In S. Karsten, & P. Sleegers (Eds.), Onderwijs en ongelijkheid: grenzen aan de maakbaarheid? (pp. 125–136) [Education and inequality: Limits to what government can do?] Antwerp/Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
  2. Dijkstra, A., Dronkers, J., & Karsten, S. (2004). Private schools as public provision for education; school choice and market forces in the Netherlands. In P. J. Wolf, & S. Macedo (Eds.), Educating citizens: International perspectives on civic values and school choice (pp. 67–90). Washington: The Brooking Institution.Google Scholar
  3. Emmelot, Y., & Veen, I. van der (2004). Brede scholen uitgelicht. [Community schools in the picture] Amsterdam: SCO-Kohnstamm Instituut.Google Scholar
  4. Grotenhuis, S. (2006). Over keuzevrijheid en burgerschap. [On freedom of choice and citizenship] Vernieuwing, 65 (2), 24–26.Google Scholar
  5. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: History and Practice, 6 (2), 151–182.Google Scholar
  6. Korthagen, F. (2004). Zin en onzin van competentiegericht opleiden. [Competence-based training: What is useful and what is pointless?] Velon Tijdschrift voor lerarenopleiders, 25 (1), 13–23.Google Scholar
  7. Leeman, Y. (2003). De pedagogische opdracht in een multi-etnische context: Docentendilemma's. [The pedagogical task in a multi-ethnic context: Teachers' dilemmas] Pedagogische Studien, 80 (6), 468–484.Google Scholar
  8. Leeman, Y. (2007). School leadership and equity: The case of the Netherlands. School Leadership and Management, 27 (1), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leeman, Y., & Ledoux, G. (2003). Intercultural education in Dutch schools. Curriculum Inquiry, 33 (4), 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leeman, Y., & Pels, T. (2006). Citizenship education in the Dutch multi-ethnic context. European Education, 38 (2), 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ledoux, G.(2005). Zes keer Prima. [Six times excellent] In S. Karsten, & P. Sleegers (Eds.), Onderwijs en ongelijkheid: grenzen aan de maakbaarheid? (pp. 151–165) [Education and inequality: Limits to what government can do?] Antwerp/Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
  12. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Moore, A.(2004). The good teacher: Dominant discourses in teaching and teacher education. London/New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  14. Parker, W. C. (2003). Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. New York/London: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  15. Paulle, B. (2005). Anxiety and intimidation in the Bronx and the Bijlmer: An ethnographic comparison of two schools. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.Google Scholar
  16. SBL. (2004). Bekwaamheidseisen leraren. Den Haag: Stichting Beroepskwaliteit Leraren.Google Scholar
  17. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning and intergroup relations. In J.A. Banks, & C. A. McGee Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 628–634). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Tesser, P. (2003). Ontwikkelingen in de schoolloopbanen van leerlingen uit achterstandsgroepen. [Trends in the school careers of pupils from disadvantaged groups]. In W. Meijnen (Ed.), Onderwijsachterstanden in basisscholen (pp. 53–78). [Educational disadvantage in primary schools] Antwerp/Apeldoorn: OOMO/Garant.Google Scholar
  19. Van Zanten, A. (2001). L'ecole de la Peripherie. Scolarite et Segregation en Banlieue. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  20. Vermeulen, B. P., (2004). Regulating school choice to promote civic values: Constitutional and political issues in the Netherlands. In P. J. Wolf, & S. Macedo (Eds.), Educating citizens: International perspectives on civic values and school choice. Washington: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  21. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72 (2), 131–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yvonne Leeman
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Universiteit van AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Windesheim University of Applied SciencesThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations