Withering the State? Globalization Challenges and Changing Higher Education Governance in East Asia

  • Ka Ho Mok
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 19)

The revolution of 1989 in Eastern Europe and their aftermath have led to a growing concern about whether modern states are losing their capacities for governance, and whether national-level processes are ceding their primacy to global ones. Believing capital is becoming more mobile and has no national attachments, national politics and political choices are considered to have been sidelined by the global market forces while transnational corporations are perceived as the key players in defining not only economic, but also social and political agendas. Hence, national-level governance is regarded as ineffective in coping with challenges generated from globalizing economic and social processes (Horsman & Marshall, 1994). The rise of “the borderless world economy,” “global politics,” and “global civil society” seems to suggest the sovereignty of the state and the capacities of any government are being eroded (Garrett, 2000; Woods, 2000).


High Education Entrepreneurial Activity High Education System State Capacity Global Civil Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Asia Times. (November 27, 2002).Google Scholar
  2. Bache, I. (2003). Governing through governance: Education policy control under new labor. Political Studies, 51, 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burbules, N., & Torres, C. (Eds.). (2000). Globalization and education: Critical perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Brodsgaard, K. E., & Young, S. (2000). Introduction: State capacity in East Asia. In K. E. Brodsgaard, & S. Young (Eds.), State capacity in East Asia: Japan, Taiwan, China, and Vietnam (pp. 1–16). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carnoy, M. (2000). Sustaining the new economy in the information age: Reflections on our changing world. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity: The information age: Economy, society and culture. Vol. II. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, S. H. (1997). Decision-making in research and development collaboration. Research Policy, 26 (1), 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheung, A. (2005). Changing public policy and governance in East Asia since the 1990s: Paradigm shifts or policy steadiness. Paper presented at the International Conference on Changing Governance and Public Policy Paradigms: Asian Perspectives, November 19–20, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou China.Google Scholar
  9. Cheung, A., & Scott, I. (Eds.). (2003). Governance and the public sector reform in Asia: Paradigm shifts or business as usual. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
  10. Currie, J., & Newson, J. (Eds.). (1998). Globalization and the universities. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. De Zilwa, D. (2005). Using entrepreneurial activities as a means of survival: Investigating the processes used by Australian universities to diversify their revenue streams. Higher Education, 50 (3), 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eriksen, T. H. (Ed.). (2003). Globalization: Studies in Anthropology. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  13. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.). (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy. London and Washington: Pinter.Google Scholar
  14. Evans, P. B. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Garrett, G. (2000). Globalization and national autonomy. In N. Woods (Ed.), The political economy of globalization (pp. 107–146). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  16. Goodman, R. (2007). The concept of Kokusaika and Japanese educational reform. Globalization, societies & education, 5 (1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guillén, M. F. (2001). Is globalization civilizing, destructive or feeble? A critique of five key debates in the Social Science literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hallak, J. (2000). Globalization and its impact on education. In T. Mebrahtu, M. Crossley, & D. Johnson (Eds.), Globalization, educational transformation and societies in transition. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  19. Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1999). Globalization in question. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Holliday, I. (2000). Productivist welfare capitalism: Social policy in East Asia. Political Studies, 48, 706–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Horsman, M., & Marshall, A. (1994). After the nation state. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  23. Hsu, C. W., & Chiang, H. C. (2001). The government strategy for the upgrading of industrial technology in Taiwan. Technovation, 21 (2), 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Institute of Policy Studies. (2003). Re-inventing the asian model: The case of Singapore. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.Google Scholar
  25. Jayasuriya, K. (2001). Globalization and the changing architecture of the state: The regulatory state and the politics of negative coordination. Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (1), 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the japanese miracle. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). Private actors and the state: Internationalization and changing patterns of governance', Governance, 15 (1), 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, M. N. N. (2004). Global trends, national policies and institutional responses: Restructuring higher education. In M. N. N. Lee (Ed.), Restructuring higher education in Malaysia (pp. 3–12). Penang: School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia.Google Scholar
  29. Lo, Y. W., & Weng, F. Y. (2005). Taiwan's responses to globalization: Internationalization of higher education. In K. H. Mok, & R. James (Eds.), Globalization and higher education in East Asia (pp. 137–156). Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic.Google Scholar
  30. Low, L. (2001). Political economy of Singapore's policy on foreign talents and high skills society. Retrieved on December 9, 2005, from
  31. Mahmood, I. P., & Singh, J. (2003). Technological dynamism in Asia. Research Policy, 32 (6), 1031–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marginson, S. (2000). Entrepreneurial universities. Comparative Education Policy Occasional Paper Series 1, 1–15, Comparative Education Policy Research Unit, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  33. Marginson, S. (2002). Going global and governing it: The growing cross-border traffic in higher education, and some of the implications for governance. Paper prepared for the Roundtable on University Governance, June 2002, Centre for Higher Education Policy Analysis, University of Southern California, Santa Fe, NM.Google Scholar
  34. Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Mathews, J. A. (2002). The origins and dynamics of Taiwan's R & D consortia. Research Policy, 31 (4), 633–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meaney, C. S. (1994). State policy and the development of Taiwan's semiconductor industry. In J. D. Aberbach, D. Dollar, & K. L. Sokoloff (Eds.), The Role of the state in Taiwan's development (pp. 170–192). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  37. Ministry of Education. (2004). FAQs on innovation and enterprise. Retrieved on December 9, 2005, from
  38. Mok, K. H. (2003a). Similar trends, diverse agendas: Higher education reforms in East Asia. Globalization, Societies & Education, 1 (2), 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mok, K. H. (2003b). Riding over autonomy and accountability: Changing university governance in Hong Kong and Singapore. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Organizational Reforms and University Governance: Autonomy and Accountability, Hiroshima University, December 17–18, 2003, Japan.Google Scholar
  40. Mok, K. H. (2005a). Fostering entrepreneurship: Changing role of government and higher education governance in Hong Kong. Research Policy, 34, 537–554.Google Scholar
  41. Mok, K. H. (2005b). Pro-competition policy instruments and state capacity: Corporatization of public universities in Hong Kong and Singapore. Paper presented at the 4th Convention for Asian Scholars, Shanghai Exhibition Centre, August 20–24, 2005, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
  42. Mok, K. H., & James, R. (Eds.). (2005). Globalization and higher education in East Asia. Singapore and New York: Marshall Cavendish Academics.Google Scholar
  43. Mok, K. H., & Tan, J. (2004). Globalization and marketization in education: A comparative analysis of Hong Kong and Singapore. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  44. Mok, K. H., & Welch, A. (Eds.). (2003). Globalization and educational restructuring in the Asia Pacific region. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Mok, K. H., & Yonezawa, A. (2005). Corporatization and changing governance: Higher education restructuring in Japan, The Journal of Japanese Studies. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  46. Moore, T. G. (2005). Chinese foreign policy in the age of globalization. In Y. Deng, & F. L. Wang (Eds.), China's rising: Power and motivation in Chinese foreign policy (pp. 121–158). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. Noble, G. (1998). Collective action in East Asia: How ruling parties shape industrial policy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  48. OECD. (2004). Education at a Glance 2004 – Tables: Indicator B3: Relative proportions of public and private investment in educational institutions. Retrieved on January 14, 2006, from,2340,en_2825_495609_33712011_1_1_1_1,00.html
  49. Ohmae, K. (1990). The borderless world. London and New York: Collins.Google Scholar
  50. Ohmae, K. (1993). The rise of the region state. Foreign Affairs, Spring, 78–87.Google Scholar
  51. Painter, M., & Wong, S. F. (2005). The telecommunications regulatory regimes in Hong Kong and Singapore: When direct state intervention meets indirect policy instruments. Paper presented to the 4th Convention of Asian Scholars, Shanghai Exhibition Centre, August 20–24, 2005, Shanghai China.Google Scholar
  52. Pempel, T. J. (1998). Regime shift: Comparative dynamics of the Japanese political economy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Peters, G. (2000). Governance and comparative politics. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance (pp. 36–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Peters, G. (2002). The politics of tool choice. In L. Salamon, & O. Elliott (Eds.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 552–564). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Pierre, J. (2000). Debating governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. PS21. (2005). Public Service for the 21st Century. Retrieved on October 17, 2005, from 1
  57. Ramesh, M. (2005). Public sector reforms in health care administration in Hong Kong and Singapore. Paper presented to the 2nd Congress of Asian Political and International Studies Association, November 14–16, 2005, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  58. Reich, R. B. (1992). The work of nations. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  59. Rhodes, A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Rhodes, A. W. (2000). Governance and public administration. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance (pp. 54–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Rosenau, J. N. (2003). Distant proximities: Dynamics beyond globalization. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Games real actors could play: Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 61 (1), 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schugurensky, D. (1999). Higher education restructuring in the era of globalization: Toward a heteronomous model? In R. F. Arnove, & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and local (pp. 283–304). Lanham: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  65. Spring, J. H. (1998). Education and the rise of the global economy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  66. Stiglitz, J. E. (2005). More instruments and broader goals: Moving toward the post-Washington consensus. In A. B. Atkinson, K. Basu, J. N. Bhagwati, D. C. North, D. Rodrik, F. Stewart, et al. (Eds.), Wider perspectives on global development (pp. 16–48). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  67. Sutz, J. (1997). The new role of the university in the productive sector. In H. Etzkowitz, & L. Leydesdorff (Eds.), Universities and the global knowledge economy (pp. 11–20). London and Washington: Pinter.Google Scholar
  68. Tan, W. L., & Tan, T. M. (2002). The usefulness of networks to SMEs: The case of Singapore. Retrieved on October 17, 2005, from
  69. Turner, V. (1974). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Harmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar
  70. UNESCO. (2003). Relative proportions of public and private expenditure on educational institutions 1999. Retrieved on January 14, 2006, from
  71. Vidovich, L., Rui, Y, & Currie, J. (2007). Changing accountabilities in higher education as China “open up” to globalization: It's like forcing a gentlewoman to be a prostitute. Globalization, Societies & Education, 5 (1), 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Weiss, L. (1998). The myth of powerless state. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  74. White, G., & Hauck, F. (2000). Campus, Inc. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  75. Woods, N. (Ed.). (2000). The political economy of globalization. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  76. Wong, J. (2002). The rise of China: Challenges for the ASEAN economies. In J. Wong, & Y. N. Zheng (Eds.), China's post-Jiang leadership succession: Problems and perspectives (pp. 355–376). Singapore: Singapore University Press and New Jersey: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  77. World Bank. (1993). The east asian economic miracle: Economic growth and public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Yeoh, M. (2004). Asia in transition. In M. Yeh, K. Y. Chong, C. M. Lim, & D. Wong (Eds.), Globalization and its impact on Asia (pp. 31–38). Kuala Lumpur, Asian Strategy & Leadership Institute.Google Scholar
  79. Yonezawa, A. (2007). Strategies for emerging global higher education market in East Asia: A comparative study of Singapore, Malaysia and Japan. Globalization, Societies & Education, 5 (1), 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zheng, Y. J. (2005). Reconsidering the economic internationalization of China: Implications of the WTO membership. Journal of Contemporary China, 12 (37), 699–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ka Ho Mok
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Hong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations