Urban Education in Asia Pacific: Section Editors'Introduction

  • Allan Luke
  • Masturah Ismail
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 19)

The field of urban education has its origins in the nexus of urbanization, industrialization and compulsory state education in North America and Europe over a century ago. Yet its key theme – educational equality and universal provision – is relevant in other places, spaces, political economies and cultures where the “urban” has quite different histories, shapes and locations. The city is a work in progress in the Asia Pacific. The modern city tended to be located along the supply lines of empire (Innis, 1951). In the Asia Pacific, the region’s major centers were established in relation to coastlines or rivers, with the lines of kinship, capital, migration and cultural exchange, language and information flowing along communication/transportation links.

Issues of centre/periphery, urban/hinterland, mainstream/minority, indigeneity/diaspora have been framed by the forces of colonialism and empire, by ongoing population movement and cultural contact, and resultant linguistic, religious and cultural heterogeneity, and, of course, by distinctive constraints of geography, space and place. Cities in Southeast Asia, for example, historically arose as colonial administrative centres, rather than manufacturing and resource sites as in the West (Ooi, 2004). In China and India, what counts as the new economic hinterland may be regional centres larger than major North American cities. In the South Pacific context that Puamau and Teasdale (Chapter 14) document, larger island villages of tens of thousands have become sites for classical urban education issues. There schools face new youth identities, generational challenges to tradition, the supplanting of traditional and subsistence economies by systems dependent on tourism and overseas aid, and new conditions of risk for families’ and individuals’ health and welfare. Across the region, as Yang’s (Chapter 12) analysis of post-1949 Chinese education illustrates, the disparities in educational funding and provision between urban and rural hinterland are a persistent problem.

Keywords

Religious Education Private Tutoring Creative Industry Asia Pacific Journal Urban Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, R. (2001). Culture and pedagogy. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (2001). Neoliberal newspeak: Notes on the new planetary vulgate. Radical Philosophy, 108, 1–6.Google Scholar
  3. Bray, M. (2003). Adverse effects of private supplementary tutoring. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, A. (2006). Gendered work in Asian cities. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. Burnett, D. G. (2005). Languages and schooling: The discourse of colonialism in Kiribati. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 25, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheah, P., & Robbins, B. (Eds.). (1998). Cosmopolitics: Thinking and feeling beyond the nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. Connell, J., & Conway, D. (2000). Migration and remittances in island microstates: A comparative perspective on the South Pacific and the Caribbean. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24, 52–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cunningham, S. (2006). What price a creative economy? Brisbane: Currency House.Google Scholar
  9. Ehrenreich, B., & Hochschild, A. R. (Eds.). (2002). Global women: Nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  10. Fan, L. (Ed.). (2004). How Chinese learn mathematics. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  11. Innis, H. A. (1951). Empire and communications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kong, L. (1999). Globalisation, transmigration and the negotiation of ethnic identity. In K. Olds, P. Dicken, P. F. Kelly, L. Kong, & H. Yeung (Eds.), Globalisation and the Asia Pacific (pp. 219–237). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Lam, E. (2006). Culture and learning in the context of globalisation: Research directions. In J. Green, & A. Luke (Eds.), Review of research in education 30. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  14. Lee, H. L. (2004, April 5). Hopes, fears and dreams. Speech at the Nanyang Technological University Student Union Ministerial Forum.Google Scholar
  15. Lee, J. (2006). Tracking achievement gaps and assessing the impact of NCLB on the gaps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Civil Rights Project.Google Scholar
  16. Lin, A., & Martin, P. (Eds.). (2005). Globalisation, decolonisation. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  17. Luke, A. (2005). Curriculum, Ethics, Metanarrative: Teaching and learning beyond the nation. In Y. Nozaki, R. Openshaw, & A. Luke (Eds.), Struggles over difference: Texts and pedagogies in the Asia Pacific (pp. 1–15). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  18. Luke, A., Freebody, P., Lau, S., & Gopinathan, S. (2005). Towards research-based educational policy: Singapore education in transition. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 14(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  19. Luke, A., & Hogan, D. (2006). Redesigning what counts as evidence in educational policy: The Singapore model. In J. Ozga, T. Seddon, & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Education policy and research (pp. 170–184). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Luke, A., & Luke, C. (2000). A situated perspective on cultural globalisation. In N. Burbules, & C. Torres (Eds.), Globalisation and education (pp. 275–299). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Luke, C. (2005). Capital and market flows: Global higher education management. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 25 (2), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond nation states, markets and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43 (3), 281–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mok, I. A. C. (2006). Shedding light on the East Asian learner paradox: Reconstructing student-centredness in a Shanghai classroom. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26 (2), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nichols, S. L., Glass, G. V., & Berliner, D. C. (2005). High stakes testing and student achievement: Problems with the no child left behind act. Tempe, AZ: Educational Policy Studies Laboratory.Google Scholar
  25. Olds, K. (2002). Globalisation and urban change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ooi, G. L. (2004). Future of space: Planning, space, and the city. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.Google Scholar
  27. Puamau, P. (2004). A postcolonial reading of affirmative action in Fiji. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 14, 109–123.Google Scholar
  28. Sa'eda, B., & Masturah, I. (Eds.). (2007). Special issue: Muslim education – challenges, opportunities and beyond. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 27 (1), 1–113.Google Scholar
  29. Stiglitz, J. E. (2003). Globalisation and its discontents. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  30. Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (2002). Teaching the Chinese learner. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Wilson, R., & Dirlik, A. (Eds.). (1995). Asia/Pacific as space of cultural production. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allan Luke
    • 1
  • Masturah Ismail
    • 2
  1. 1.Queensland University of TechnologyAustralia
  2. 2.Nanyang Technological UniversitySingapore

Personalised recommendations